Literature DB >> 26319271

Clinicopathological comparison of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas in patients with Lynch-like syndrome versus patients with Lynch syndrome.

Jenny Mas-Moya1, Beth Dudley2, Randall E Brand2, Darcy Thull2, Nathan Bahary3, Marina N Nikiforova1, Reetesh K Pai4.   

Abstract

Screening for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in colorectal and endometrial carcinomas identifies patients at risk for Lynch syndrome. Some patients with MMR-deficient tumors have no evidence of a germline mutation and have been described as having Lynch-like syndrome. We compared the clinicopathological features of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas in patients with Lynch-like syndrome and Lynch syndrome. Universal screening identified 356 (10.6%) of 3352 patients with colorectal carcinoma and 72 (33%) of 215 patients with endometrial carcinoma with deficient DNA MMR. Sixty-six patients underwent germline mutation analysis with 45 patients (68%) having evidence of a germline MMR gene mutation confirming Lynch syndrome and 21 patients (32%) having Lynch-like syndrome with no evidence of a germline mutation. Most patients with Lynch-like syndrome had carcinoma involving the right colon compared to patients with Lynch syndrome (93% versus 45%; P < .002). All patients with colorectal carcinomas demonstrating isolated loss of MSH6 expression had Lynch syndrome confirmed by germline mutation analysis. Synchronous or metachronous Lynch syndrome-associated carcinoma was more frequently identified in patients with Lynch syndrome compared to Lynch-like syndrome (38% versus 7%; P = .04). There were no significant differences in clinicopathological variables between patients with Lynch-like syndrome and Lynch syndrome with endometrial carcinoma. In summary, 32% of patients with MMR deficiency concerning Lynch syndrome will have Lynch-like syndrome. Our results demonstrate that patients with Lynch-like syndrome are more likely to have right-sided colorectal carcinoma, less likely to have synchronous or metachronous Lynch syndrome-associated carcinoma, and less likely to demonstrate isolated loss of MSH6 expression within their tumor.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal carcinoma; Endometrial carcinoma; Lynch syndrome; Lynch-like syndrome; MSI; Mismatch repair protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319271     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  24 in total

1.  DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Rectal Cancer: Benchmarking Its Impact on Prognosis, Neoadjuvant Response Prediction, and Clinical Cancer Genetics.

Authors:  Nicole de Rosa; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; George J Chang; Jula Veerapong; Ester Borras; Sunil Krishnan; Brian Bednarski; Craig A Messick; John M Skibber; Barry W Feig; Patrick M Lynch; Eduardo Vilar; Y Nancy You
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Rachel Pearlman; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Albert de la Chapelle; Jon G Jonasson; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Wendy L Frankel; Thorunn Rafnar; Kari Stefansson; Colin C Pritchard; Heather Hampel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Cancer screening behaviors and risk perceptions among family members of colorectal cancer patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency.

Authors:  Lior H Katz; Shailesh Advani; Allison M Burton-Chase; Bryan Fellman; Katrina M Polivka; Ying Yuan; Patrick M Lynch; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  DNA mismatch repair protein deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts: a novel indicator of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Rish K Pai; Beth Dudley; Eve Karloski; Randall E Brand; Neil O'Callaghan; Christophe Rosty; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark A Jenkins; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Noralane M Lindor; Reetesh K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Frequent loss of mutation-specific mismatch repair protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium of Lynch syndrome patients.

Authors:  Serena Wong; Pei Hui; Natalia Buza
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Frequent PIK3CA Mutations in Colorectal and Endometrial Tumors With 2 or More Somatic Mutations in Mismatch Repair Genes.

Authors:  Stacey A Cohen; Emily H Turner; Mallory B Beightol; Angela Jacobson; Ted A Gooley; Stephen J Salipante; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Christina Smith; Sheena Scroggins; Jonathan F Tait; William M Grady; Edward H Lin; David E Cohn; Paul J Goodfellow; Mark W Arnold; Albert de la Chapelle; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer: New purpose for an old test.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Shannon N Westin; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Uterine endometrial carcinoma with DNA mismatch repair deficiency: magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical features.

Authors:  Kiyoyuki Minamiguchi; Junko Takahama; Tomoko Uchiyama; Ryosuke Taiji; Natsuhiko Saito; Hiroshi Okada; Nagaaki Marugami; Yasuhito Tanase; Ryuji Kawaguchi; Chiho Ohbayashi; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Toshiko Hirai; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma with double somatic mismatch-repair mutations is indistinguishable from those caused by Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica A Hemminger; Rachel Pearlman; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Deborah Knight; Jon Gunnlaugur Jonasson; Colin C Pritchard; Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Incidence of germline variants in Lynch syndrome-related genes among Japanese endometrial cancer patients aged 40 years or younger.

Authors:  Takeshi Makabe; Wataru Yamagami; Akira Hirasawa; Izumi Miyabe; Tomokazu Wakatsuki; Mari Kikuchi; Akemi Takahashi; Junko Noda; Go Yamamoto; Daisuke Aoki; Kiwamu Akagi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.