Literature DB >> 27832499

Cancer screening behaviors and risk perceptions among family members of colorectal cancer patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency.

Lior H Katz1,2,3, Shailesh Advani4, Allison M Burton-Chase4,5, Bryan Fellman4, Katrina M Polivka4, Ying Yuan4, Patrick M Lynch4, Susan K Peterson4.   

Abstract

Communication gaps in families with unexplained mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (UMMRD) could negatively impact the screening behaviors of relatives of individual with UMMRD. We evaluated cancer risk perception, screening behaviors, and family communication among relatives of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with UMMRD. Fifty-one family members of 17 probands with UMMRD completed a questionnaire about cancer risk perception, adherence to Lynch syndrome (LS) screening recommendations, and communication with relatives. Clinical data about the probands were obtained from medical records. Thirty-eight participants (78%) were worried from having cancer and twenty-one participants (42%) had undergone colonoscopy in the past 2 years, as recommended for LS families. In terms of screening for extracolonic cancers, only two eligible participants (3.9%) were screened for gastric, endometrial (10.0%), and ovarian (9.5%) cancers. Additionally, 5 participants (10%) underwent genetic counseling. Most participants were not told by anyone to be screened for extracolonic cancers (84, 85, and 95% for gastric, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, respectively). A minority of family members of CRC patients with UMMRD follow cancer screening as recommended for LS families. Health care providers should encourage patients with UMMRD to share information on LS-related cancers screening, especially extracolonic cancers, with their relatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; HNPCC; Lynch syndrome; Mismatch repair; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27832499      PMCID: PMC5945287          DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9947-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  23 in total

1.  Awareness of genetic testing for colorectal cancer predisposition among specialists in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Shivani Batra; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Margaret McGovern; Steven Itzkowitz; Karen Brown
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

3.  Screening adherence and cancer risk perceptions in colorectal cancer survivors with Lynch-like syndrome.

Authors:  L H Katz; A M Burton-Chase; S Advani; B Fellman; K M Polivka; Y Yuan; P M Lynch; S K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Prevalence of germline MUTYH mutations among Lynch-like syndrome patients.

Authors:  Adela Castillejo; Gardenia Vargas; María Isabel Castillejo; Matilde Navarro; Víctor Manuel Barberá; Sara González; Eva Hernández-Illán; Joan Brunet; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Judith Balmaña; Silvestre Oltra; Sílvia Iglesias; Angela Velasco; Ares Solanes; Olga Campos; Ana Beatriz Sánchez Heras; Javier Gallego; Estela Carrasco; Dolors González Juan; Angel Segura; Isabel Chirivella; María José Juan; Isabel Tena; Conxi Lázaro; Ignacio Blanco; Marta Pineda; Gabriel Capellá; José Luis Soto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Francis M Giardiello; John I Allen; Jennifer E Axilbund; C Richard Boland; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; James M Church; Jason A Dominitz; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David A Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Differentiating Lynch-like from Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The mystery of mismatch repair deficiency: lynch or lynch-like?

Authors:  C Richard Boland
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Perceptions of cancer risks and predictors of colon and endometrial cancer screening in women undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Donald W Hadley; Jean F Jenkins; Seth M Steinberg; David Liewehr; Stephanie Moller; Jean C Martin; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Risk of cancer in cases of suspected lynch syndrome without germline mutation.

Authors:  María Rodríguez-Soler; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Carla Guarinos; Pedro Zapater; Adela Castillejo; Victor M Barberá; Miriam Juárez; Xavier Bessa; Rosa M Xicola; Juan Clofent; Luis Bujanda; Francesc Balaguer; Josep-Maria Reñé; Luisa de-Castro; José C Marín-Gabriel; Angel Lanas; Joaquín Cubiella; David Nicolás-Pérez; Alejandro Brea-Fernández; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Cristina Alenda; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Angel Carracedo; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Xavier Llor; José L Soto; Artemio Payá; Rodrigo Jover
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in the psychosocial and behavioral responses associated with a diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sowmya Jonnagadla; Sharelle L Joseland; Sibel Saya; Nicole den Elzen; Joanne Isbister; Ingrid M Winship; Daniel D Buchanan
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  Patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency are interested in updated genetic testing.

Authors:  Jessica Omark; Eduardo Vilar; Y Nancy You; Leslie Dunnington; Sarah Noblin; Blair Stevens; Maureen Mork
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 3.  Population genomic screening: Ethical considerations to guide age at implementation.

Authors:  Scott J Spencer; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.