Literature DB >> 27432916

DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Rectal Cancer: Benchmarking Its Impact on Prognosis, Neoadjuvant Response Prediction, and Clinical Cancer Genetics.

Nicole de Rosa1, Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas1, George J Chang1, Jula Veerapong1, Ester Borras1, Sunil Krishnan1, Brian Bednarski1, Craig A Messick1, John M Skibber1, Barry W Feig1, Patrick M Lynch1, Eduardo Vilar1, Y Nancy You2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) hallmarks consensus molecular subtype 1 of colorectal cancer. It is being routinely tested, but little is known about dMMR rectal cancers. The efficacy of novel treatment strategies cannot be established without benchmarking the outcomes of dMMR rectal cancer with current therapy. We aimed to delineate the impact of dMMR on prognosis, the predicted response to fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant therapy, and implications of germline alterations in the MMR genes in rectal cancer.
METHODS: Between 1992 and 2012, 62 patients with dMMR rectal cancers underwent multimodality therapy. Oncologic treatment and outcomes as well as clinical genetics work-up were examined. Overall and rectal cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 41 years. MMR deficiency was most commonly due to alterations in MSH2 (53%) or MSH6 (23%). After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the 5-year rectal cancer-specific survival was 100% for stage I and II, 85.1% for stage III, and 60.0% for stage IV disease. Fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation was associated with a complete pathologic response rate of 27.6%. The extent of surgical resection was influenced by synchronous colonic disease at presentation, tumor height, clinical stage, and pelvic radiation. An informed decision for a limited resection focusing on proctectomy did not compromise overall survival. Five of the 11 (45.5%) deaths during follow-up were due to extracolorectal malignancies.
CONCLUSION: dMMR rectal cancer had excellent prognosis and pathologic response with current multimodality therapy including an individualized surgical treatment plan. Identification of a dMMR rectal cancer should trigger germline testing, followed by lifelong surveillance for both colorectal and extracolorectal malignancies. We herein provide genotype-specific outcome benchmarks for comparison with novel interventions.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432916      PMCID: PMC5012714          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  45 in total

1.  The differential impact of microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and tumour response between colon cancer and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Pil Hong; Byung So Min; Tae Il Kim; Jae Hee Cheon; Nam Kyu Kim; Hoguen Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Next-generation strategies for hereditary colorectal cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Classifying MMR variants: time for revised nomenclature in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Y Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Rectal cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Lee; N J Petrelli; M A Rodriguez-Bigas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Point: justification for Lynch syndrome screening among all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heather Hampel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  High Prevalence of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maureen E Mork; Y Nancy You; Jun Ying; Sarah A Bannon; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Eduardo Vilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Differences in short-term outcomes among patients undergoing IPAA with or without preoperative radiation: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

Authors:  Brittany E Wertzberger; Scott K Sherman; John C Byrn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Application of a 5-tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2,360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database.

Authors:  Bryony A Thompson; Amanda B Spurdle; John-Paul Plazzer; Marc S Greenblatt; Kiwamu Akagi; Fahd Al-Mulla; Bharati Bapat; Inge Bernstein; Gabriel Capellá; Johan T den Dunnen; Desiree du Sart; Aurelie Fabre; Michael P Farrell; Susan M Farrington; Ian M Frayling; Thierry Frebourg; David E Goldgar; Christopher D Heinen; Elke Holinski-Feder; Maija Kohonen-Corish; Kristina Lagerstedt Robinson; Suet Yi Leung; Alexandra Martins; Pal Moller; Monika Morak; Minna Nystrom; Paivi Peltomaki; Marta Pineda; Ming Qi; Rajkumar Ramesar; Lene Juel Rasmussen; Brigitte Royer-Pokora; Rodney J Scott; Rolf Sijmons; Sean V Tavtigian; Carli M Tops; Thomas Weber; Juul Wijnen; Michael O Woods; Finlay Macrae; Maurizio Genuardi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Mai Yamauchi; Reiko Nishihara; Zhi Rong Qian; Teppei Morikawa; Jeanne Shen; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Hashem A Shihab; Julian Gough; David N Cooper; Peter D Stenson; Gary L A Barker; Keith J Edwards; Ian N M Day; Tom R Gaunt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  28 in total

1.  Can Microsatellite Status of Colorectal Cancer Be Reliably Assessed after Neoadjuvant Therapy?

Authors:  Jennifer B Goldstein; William Wu; Ester Borras; Gita Masand; Amanda Cuddy; Maureen E Mork; Sarah A Bannon; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Melissa W Taggart; Ji Wu; Paul Scheet; Scott Kopetz; Y Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  An NRG Oncology/GOG study of molecular classification for risk prediction in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Craig M Rush; Heather A Lankes; William T Creasman; David S Miller; Nilsa C Ramirez; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Cynthia Timmers; Adrian A Suarez; Richard J Zaino; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Colorectal Cancer in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population.

Authors:  Y Nancy You; Lucas D Lee; Benjamin W Deschner; David Shibata
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-01

Review 4.  Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Hannah M Thompson; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Genetics of rectal cancer and novel therapies: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Sebastian Mondaca; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

Review 6.  Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients.

Authors:  Mingzhu Sun; Jayne Moquet; Michele Ellender; Simon Bouffler; Christophe Badie; Rachel Baldwin-Cleland; Kevin Monahan; Andrew Latchford; David Lloyd; Susan Clark; Nicola A Anyamene; Elizabeth Ainsbury; David Burling
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Benchmarking Outcomes for Definitive Treatment of Young-Onset, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nicolette Taku; Y Nancy Yi-Qian; George J Chang; Ethan B Ludmir; Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Emma Brey Holliday; Grace L Smith; Bruce D Minsky; Michael J Overman; Craig Messick; David Boyce-Fappiano; Albert C Koong; John Michael Skibber; Eugene Jon Koay; Arvind Dasari; Cullen M Taniguchi; Brian K Bednarski; Van K Morris; Scott Kopetz; Prajnan Das
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Deleterious Effect of RAS and Evolutionary High-risk TP53 Double Mutation in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Yun Shin Chun; Guillaume Passot; Suguru Yamashita; Maliha Nusrat; Panagiotis Katsonis; Jonathan M Loree; Claudius Conrad; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Lianchun Xiao; Thomas A Aloia; Cathy Eng; Scott E Kopetz; Olivier Lichtarge; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological and Molecular Features After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hee Jeong Cho; Jin Ho Baek; Dong Won Baek; Byung Woog Kang; Soo Jung Lee; Hye Jin Kim; Su Yeon Park; Jun Seok Park; Gyu Seog Choi; Jong Gwang Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Mismatch Repair-Deficient Rectal Cancer and Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea Cercek; Gustavo Dos Santos Fernandes; Campbell S Roxburgh; Karuna Ganesh; Shu Ng; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Rona Yaeger; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Anna M Varghese; Arnold Markowitz; Chao Wu; Bryan Szeglin; Charles-Etienne Gabriel Sauvé; Erin Salo-Mullen; Christina Tran; Zalak Patel; Asha Krishnan; Kaitlyn Tkachuk; Garrett M Nash; Jose Guillem; Philip B Paty; Jinru Shia; Nikolaus Schultz; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Luis A Diaz; Karyn Goodman; Leonard B Saltz; Martin R Weiser; J Joshua Smith; Zsofia K Stadler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.