Yu Zhao1, Chuntao Yang2, Chelsea Organ3, Zhen Li3, Shashi Bhushan3, Hiro Otsuka3, Armando Pacheco1, Jianming Kang1, Hector C Aguilar4, David J Lefer3, Ming Xian1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Washington State University , Pullman, Washington 99164, United States. 2. Department of Physiology, Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou 511436, China. 3. Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Science Center , New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States. 4. Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University , Pullman, Washington 99164, United States.
Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a signaling molecule which plays regulatory roles in many physiological and/or pathological processes. Therefore, regulation of H2S levels could have great potential therapeutic value. In this work, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a class of N-mercapto (N-SH)-based H2S donors. Thirty-three donors were synthesized and tested. Our results indicated that controllable H2S release from these donors could be achieved upon structural modifications. Selected donors (NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6) were tested in cellular models of oxidative damage and showed significant cytoprotective effects. Moreover, NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 were also found to exhibit potent protective effects in a murine model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MI/R) injury.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a signaling molecule which plays regulatory roles in many physiological and/or pathological processes. Therefore, regulation of H2S levels could have great potential therapeutic value. In this work, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a class of N-mercapto (N-SH)-based H2S donors. Thirty-three donors were synthesized and tested. Our results indicated that controllable H2S release from these donors could be achieved upon structural modifications. Selected donors (NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6) were tested in cellular models of oxidative damage and showed significant cytoprotective effects. Moreover, NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 were also found to exhibit potent protective effects in a murine model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MI/R) injury.
Hydrogen
sulfide (H2S), which is known for its characteristic
odor of rotten eggs, has been considered as a highly toxic air pollutant
for centuries. However, this gaseous molecule has been recently recognized
as a member of a gasotransmitter family along with nitric oxide (NO)
and carbon monoxide (CO).[1−7] Endogenous H2S formation has been attributed to at least
three enzymes: cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), cystathionine
γ-lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfur-transferase (MPST).[8−12] These enzymes convert cysteine or cysteine derivatives to H2S in different tissues and organs. A number of studies have
revealed a variety of biological effects of H2S, which
include vasodilation,[13−15] anti-inflammation,[16,17] anticancer,[18,19] and cardioprotection.[20−24] While the exact mechanisms of these actions are still under investigation,
some interesting biochemical/catabolic reactions of H2S
have been disclosed. For example, H2S reacts readily with
methemoglobin to yield sulfhemoglobin.[25] H2S inhibits cytochrome c oxidase, which
accounts for its toxic action.[26] H2S is an effective reducing agent and can react with reactive
oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite.[27−29] It has been reported that H2S can cause protein S-sulfhydration (i.e., to form -S-SH),[30−32] and this process is significant as it provides a possible route
by which H2S can alter functions of a wide range of cellular
proteins and enzymes.[33−35] H2S can also interact with S-nitrosothiols to yield thionitrous acid (HSNO), the smallest S-nitrosothiol, which can freely diffuse through membranes
to facilitate transnitrosation of proteins.[36] These reactions may be responsible for the biological functions
of H2S. It is also possible that additional important biological
reactions of H2S will be discovered. All of these findings
suggest that regulation of H2S levels may have great therapeutic
value.In the H2S field, H2S releasing
agents (also
known as H2S donors) are important research tools.[37,38] Moreover, H2S donors could potentially be unique therapeutic
agents, given the well-documented protective effects of H2S in many disease states.[37,38] Among these donors,
sulfide salts, including sodium sulfide (Na2S) and sodium
hydrogen sulfide (NaHS), are most frequently used. These salts have
the advantage of boosting H2S concentrations rapidly. However,
they release H2S spontaneously in aqueous solution, making
it hard to control the precise H2S concentrations. In addition,
H2S concentrations in aqueous solution can rapidly decrease
due to volatilization, thus significantly limiting the use of these
two H2S precursors.[39]Considering these drawbacks, synthetic H2S donors have
received considerable attention, and a number of donors have been
reported.[40,41] For example, a widely used donor is GYY4137,
a derivative of Lawesson’s reagent.[42] GYY4137 has been demonstrated to release H2S both in vitro and in vivo. GYY4137 can induce
H2S-related biological effects such as vasodilation and
anti-inflammation.[42−45] However, the mechanism of H2S release from GYY4137 is
still unclear. The extremely slow release of H2S from GYY4137
could also be problematic for its applications.[46] Dithiolthiones (DTTs) are another class of synthetic H2S donors.[38] DTTs have been widely
used to prepare nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs)-H2S hybrids. The resultant HS-NSAIDs, compared to the parent
NSAIDs, showed similar anti-inflammatory effects but significantly
decreased gastric damage.[47−49] Although DTTs have shown promising
H2S-related biological activities, their H2S
release is also uncontrollable, and their H2S release profile
has not been explored yet.The problem with the majority of
currently available donors is
that the H2S generation from these compounds is uncontrollable.
Commonly used donors such as sulfide salts and GYY4137 release H2S spontaneously upon hydrolysis, making it very difficult
to obtain the precise physiological or pharmacological H2S levels needed. Modifications made between the time that a solution
is prepared and the time that the biological effect is measured can
dramatically affect research outcomes and sometimes can even get disparate
results. From a therapeutic perspective and for applications in H2S-related biological research, ideal H2S donors
should release H2S slowly in moderate amounts and/or in
a highly controllable manner. To this end, our group introduced thiol-activated
H2S donors in 2009.[50] The idea
is described in Scheme . It is known that S–N bonds are weak and can break under
certain conditions.[51−53] This property makes N-mercapto (N-SH) species, such as 1, useful templates
for the design of H2S donors. As N-SH
species are unstable and highly reactive, we expected that the protecting
groups on −SH should enhance their stability. Moreover, the
removal of protecting groups can be achieved by different strategies,
making controllable H2S release possible. To prove this
hypothesis, 12 N-(benzoylthio)benzamides were prepared
as the first thiol-activated H2S donors. Some preliminary
results regarding their H2S release profiles were reported.[50] Recently, we expanded the scope of this type
of donors and studied 33 substrates. Herein, we report the comprehensive
results about these N-SH-based donors (NSHDs), including
their synthesis, H2S release evaluation/mechanism, and
structure–activity relationship (SAR). In addition, protective
effects of selected donors on cellular oxidative damages and myocardial
ischemia reperfusion (MI/R) injury are also reported.
Scheme 1
Design
of NSHDs
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
of N-(Acylthio)amides as NSHDs
In the design
of thiol-activated NSHDs, acyl groups were selected
as the protecting groups on −SH. Both alkyl- and aryl-based
acyl groups were used to prepare the donors. The synthesis is illustrated
in Scheme . Readily
available thiocarboxylic acids 2 were the starting materials.
The treatment of 2 with hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic acid gave S-acylthiohydroxylamines 3 as the reactive intermediates, which were further reacted
(without separation) with acid anhydrides to provide NSHDs 4. In total, 26 NSHDs were prepared using this route, and overall
yields were 61–81%.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of NSHDs
H2S Release of N-(Acylthio)amides
With these compounds in hand, we first tested their H2S release ability in aqueous buffers. N-(Acylthio)amides
were found to be stable in buffers. Unlike hydrolysis-based donors, N-(acylthio)amides did not release H2S spontaneously.
In addition, no H2S generation was observed in the presence
of some potential cellular nucleophiles, such as serine and lysine.
However, a time-dependent H2S release was detected when
cysteine was added into the solutions, indicating that thiols are
essential to trigger H2S release from these molecules.In order to systematically compare the H2S generation
capabilities of these donors, we studied the effects of donor concentrations,
cysteine concentrations, and solvent systems, as well as reaction
time/temperatures. Eventually, the optimized conditions were found
to use 100 μM donors and 1000 μM cysteine in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) containing 10% tetrahydrofuran (THF).
H2S release was monitored at room temperature for 2 h.
The well-known methylene blue (MB) method was used to measure H2S generation. Using NSHD-1 as the example (Figure ), a maximum of 56
μM of H2S (peak H2S concentration) at
50 min (peak time) was detected. As shown in Figure , higher concentrations of cysteine (i.e.,
2 mM) did not significantly improve H2S release, while
lower concentrations of cysteine (i.e 0.5 mM) dramatically decreased
H2S production. In addition to cysteine, GSH’s ability
to promote H2S release from NSHDs was also evaluated. Results
showed that GSH (1 mM) can also successfully trigger H2S release at levels comparable to those of 1 mM cysteine.
Figure 1
Cysteine and
GSH-mediated H2S release from NSHD-1.
Cysteine and
GSH-mediated H2S release from NSHD-1.All NSHD substrates were then
tested under the optimized conditions.
Briefly, a solution of each donor (0.1 mM) and cysteine (or GSH, 1
mM) was prepared in a mixed solvent system PBS/THF (9:1, v/v). At
different reaction times, 1.0 mL of reaction aliquots were taken and
mixed with MB cocktails (0.5 mL). The MB reactions were carried out
for 15 min, and absorbance at 670 nm was then measured. H2S concentrations were calculated based on a Na2S standard
curve (please see the Experimental Procedures section for detailed procedures). Each donor was tested three times,
and their average results are summarized in Table . The results showed that up to 68% of H2S can be detected within a 2-h experimental period, indicating
that N-(acylthio)amides are potent H2S
donors. As for SAR, electronic effects on H2S release were
observed. Compared to the parent donor NSHD-1, donors
with electron withdrawing groups (NSHD-2–NSHD-5) showed faster H2S release; donors with
electron donating groups (NSHD-6–NSHD-12) exhibited slower H2S release. Steric effects were also
observed as more sterically hindered substrates showed slower H2S release (NSHD-13–NSHD-15). In addition to the thioester moiety, SAR studies were also conducted
on amide terminals (NSHD-20–NSHD-26). Results showed that all of these amide-modified donors exhibited
similar H2S releasing abilities, suggesting that the amide
end had little effects on the reactivity. In all GSH-treated groups,
peak times were constantly 5–20 min slower than those in cysteine-treated
groups. This is presumably due to the increased steric hindrance of
GSH, therefore causing a slower reaction to release H2S.
These findings demonstrated that structural modifications can regulate
H2S release from NSHDs, therefore, achieving controllable
H2S generation.
Table 1
H2S Release
Profiles of N-(Acylthio)amides
Data were obtained with cysteine.
Data were obtained with GSH.
Data were obtained with cysteine.Data were obtained with GSH.
Synthesis and H2S Release of 1-(Benzoylthio)-3-phenylureas
To expand the scope of the donors, we next replaced the amide moiety
with urea templates. A series of 1-mercapto-3-phenylurea-based H2S donors (6) were synthesized (Scheme ). Briefly, readily available
thiocarboxylic acids were treated with hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic acid to form S-acylthiohydroxylamines 3, which were then conjugated with phenyl isocyanate derivatives
(5) to provide 1-(benzoylthio)-3-phenylureas (6) as the desired products.
Scheme 3
Chemical Synthesis of 1-Mercapto-3-phenylurea-Based
Donors
H2S release from
these donors was tested using the same
protocol described above, and the results are shown in Table . Interestingly, these 1-(benzoylthio)-3-phenylurea
based donors showed lower and slower H2S release as compared
to N-(acylthio)amides.
Table 2
H2S Release Profiles of
1-(Benzoylthio)-3-phenylurea Based Donorsa
CysSH
GSH
donors
R1
R2
Tpeak (min)
[H2S]peak (μM)
Tpeak (min)
[H2S]peak (μM)
NSHD-27
H
H
95
21.5
110
29.9
NSHD-28
OCH3
H
105
14.1
120
26.4
NSHD-29
CH3
H
105
16.5
130
20.0
NSHD-30
F
H
75
18.8
90
18.5
NSHD-31
Cl
H
95
18.2
120
24.9
NSHD-32
H
CH3
90
21.8
130
27.4
NSHD-33
H
Cl
110
10.7
120
20.9
Data were reported as the average
value of three measurements.
Data were reported as the average
value of three measurements.
H2S Release Mechanism
To understand the
mechanism of H2S release from these N-mercapto-based
donors, a model reaction using NSHD-1 and cysteine (10
equiv) was studied. Three products, N-benzoyl cysteine 8, benzamide 10, and cystine 12,
were obtained. On the basis of these products, the H2S
release mechanism was proposed as follows (Scheme ): a reversible thiol exchange between NSHD-1 and cysteine initiates the reaction. The resultant S-benzoyl cysteine 7 should then undergo a
native chemical ligation (NCL)-type acyl transfer to form a more stable N-benzoyl cysteine 8. Meanwhile, the free N-SH species, N-mercaptobenzamide 9, should react with cysteine to yield benzamide 10 and cysteine perthiol 11. The latter product can further
react with cysteine to liberate H2S and form cystine 12.
Scheme 4
Proposed Mechanism of H2S Release from
NSHDs
Cytotoxicity of NSHDs
With these NSHDs in hand, we
next explored their H2S-induced biological activities.
Recent studies have suggested that H2S can protect the
cardiovascular system against myocardial ischemia reperfusion (MI/R)
injury. It has been demonstrated that H2S (using Na2S or NaHS), when applied at the time of reperfusion or as
a preconditioning reagent, exhibits significant cardioprotection by
different mechanisms, such as reducing oxidative stress, preserving
mitochondrial function, decreasing myocardial inflammation, and improving
angiogenesis.[20−24] Among these, H2S’s effects as an antioxidant may
play a prominent role. We envisioned that NSHDs should exhibit similar
cardioprotective activities due to H2S release.Before
conducting experiments to investigate NSHD’s cardioprotective
actions, we tested the cytotoxicity of three representative donors
(NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6) in H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. These three donors were selected because
of their varied H2S release abilities. The cells, originating
from rat heart ventricular tissue, have been widely used as an in vitro model for cardiac muscle in virtue of their morphological
features and biochemical properties.[54] In
our experiment, H9c2 cells were incubated with each donor at different
concentrations (20–160 μM) for 1 h. Cells were then washed
with PBS twice to remove extracellular donors, and cell viability
was measured by the standard CCK-8 assay. As shown in Figure , these donors did not exhibit
significant cytotoxicity at low concentrations (<40 μM).
However, cytotoxicity was observed when higher concentrations (>80
μM) were applied. Considering that cysteine and GSH are rich
in living systems, which are expected to react with NSHDs and trigger
H2S release, we envisioned NSHD-induced cytotoxicity could
be diminished or avoided when cysteine or GSH is presented. To prove
this hypothesis, H9c2 cells were then incubated with each donor (160
μM) in the presence of cysteine (480 μM). As expected,
NSHD’s cytotoxicity was completely suppressed, suggesting that
NSHDs should be safe in cysteine-rich environments.
Figure 2
Cytotoxicity of NSHDs
in the absence or presence of cysteine. H9c2
cells were incubated with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6 at varied concentrations (20–160
μM) for 1 h in the absence or presence of cysteine (480 μM).
Excess NSHDs were then washed away with PBS. The CCK-8 assay was applied
to measure cell viability. Data were expressed as the mean ±
SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
vs the control group.
Cytotoxicity of NSHDs
in the absence or presence of cysteine. H9c2
cells were incubated with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6 at varied concentrations (20–160
μM) for 1 h in the absence or presence of cysteine (480 μM).
Excess NSHDs were then washed away with PBS. The CCK-8 assay was applied
to measure cell viability. Data were expressed as the mean ±
SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
vs the control group.
Establishment of an in Vitro Model of MI/R
Injury
Under the condition of MI/R injury, oxidative stress
(OS) plays a central role.[55] OS-induced
cell injury can be triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS), including
superoxide (O2•–), hydroxyl radical
(•OH), singlet oxygen (•O), and
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).[56,57] Among these, H2O2 is the dominant form due
to its stability.[58] Therefore, H2O2-treated H9c2 cells are usually used as an in
vitro model of MI/R injury.[59,60] To establish
the cellular model of MI/R injury, H9c2 cells were treated with increasing
concentrations of H2O2 (100–800 μM)
for 5 h. As shown in Figure , exposure of H9c2 cells to H2O2 led
to a dose-dependent inhibition in cell viability (P < 0.01), indicating that H2O2 was able
to induce the oxidative injury in cardiomyocytes. This can partly
imitate in vivo I/R-triggered effects. Since the
median lethal concentration of H2O2 in H9c2
cells was approximately 400 μM, this concentration was used
for the following studies.
Figure 3
Effects of H2O2 on cell
viability. H9c2 cells
were treated with varied concentrations of H2O2 for 5 h. The CCK-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability.
Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P <
0.01 vs the control group.
Effects of H2O2 on cell
viability. H9c2 cells
were treated with varied concentrations of H2O2 for 5 h. The CCK-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability.
Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P <
0.01 vs the control group.
Effects of NSHDs on H2O2-Induced Damage
in H9c2 Cells
We next tested the protective capabilities
of NSHDs against H2O2-induced cellular damage.
In these experiments, H9c2 cells were pretreated with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, or NSHD-6 at varied concentrations
(40, 80, and 160 μM) in the presence of cysteine (480 μM)
for 1 h. Cells were then washed with PBS to remove extracellular NSHDs
and cysteine. The donor-treated cells were challenged by H2O2 (400 μM) for another 5 h, after which cell viability
was analyzed. Results showed that NSHDs exhibited significant attenuation
of H2O2-induced damage (Figure A, B, and C). In order to compare these new
donors with known donors, we also tested the effects of GYY4137 and
NaHS, two well-studied H2S donors, under the same conditions.
Similar protective effects were observed with GYY4137 and NaHS (40,
80, and 160 μM) (Figure D and E). To further prove that the protective effects of
NSHDs were due to H2S release, we studied the effects of
cysteine only (480 μM) and byproducts of NSHDs (i.e., N-benzoyl cysteine (NBC) and benzamide (BZM), at 160 μM).
These species did not exhibit protection against H2O2-induced damage (Figure F). Taken together, these results suggested that NSHDs
can protect cardiomyocytes from oxidative injury and that their protective
activities are likely due to H2S release.
Figure 4
Effects of H2S donors (A–E) and NSHD byproducts
(F) on H2O2-induced cellular damage. Prior to
the 5-h H2O2 (400 μM) treatment, H9c2
cells were preconditioned with NSHD-1 (A), NSHD-2 (B), and NSHD-6 (C) in the presence of cysteine (480
μM) at the indicated concentrations for 1 h. GYY4137 (D) and
NaHS (E) were used as positive controls under similar conditions.
Effects of H2S releasing byproducts, such as NBC and BZM
(160 μM), and cysteine alone (480 μM) were also investigated
(F). The CCK-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability. Data
were expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01
vs the control group. †P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treatment group.
Effects of H2S donors (A–E) and NSHD byproducts
(F) on H2O2-induced cellular damage. Prior to
the 5-h H2O2 (400 μM) treatment, H9c2
cells were preconditioned with NSHD-1 (A), NSHD-2 (B), and NSHD-6 (C) in the presence of cysteine (480
μM) at the indicated concentrations for 1 h. GYY4137 (D) and
NaHS (E) were used as positive controls under similar conditions.
Effects of H2S releasing byproducts, such as NBC and BZM
(160 μM), and cysteine alone (480 μM) were also investigated
(F). The CCK-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability. Data
were expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01
vs the control group. †P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treatment group.
Measurement of LDH and MMP Levels
In addition to the
cell viability assay, several other methods were also used to validate
NSHD’s protective effects in cells. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
is a stable cytoplasmic enzyme located in the cytoplasm under normal
conditions. When the heart suffers from MI/R injury, the cell membrane
of cardiomyocytes is damaged, leading to the increase of cell membrane
permeability and LDH leakage from the cells into the blood.[61] In the present study, by comparing the contents
of LDH in cytoplasm and medium, the LDH release rate can be used to
indicate the extent of cellular injury. As shown in Figure , preconditioning of H9c2 cells
with cysteine (480 μM, 1 h) followed by the exposure to H2O2 (400 μM, 5 h) remarkably enhanced LDH
release, indicating that H2O2 induced severe
damage to cells and that cysteine (480 μM) did not provide protection.
However, LDH release was significantly reduced when cells were pretreated
with 160 μM NSHD donors in the presence of cysteine (480 μM),
demonstrating that NSHDs can protect cells from oxidative damage.
Figure 5
Effects
of NSHDs on H2O2-induced LDH release.
H9c2 cells were preconditioned with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6 (160 μM) in the presence of cysteine
(480 μM) for 1 h followed by treatment with H2O2 (400 μM) for 5 h. LDH in cells and medium was measured
with a commercial kit. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM.
**P < 0.01 vs the control group. ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treatment
group.
Effects
of NSHDs on H2O2-induced LDH release.
H9c2 cells were preconditioned with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6 (160 μM) in the presence of cysteine
(480 μM) for 1 h followed by treatment with H2O2 (400 μM) for 5 h. LDH in cells and medium was measured
with a commercial kit. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM.
**P < 0.01 vs the control group. ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treatment
group.Mitochondria are the energy factory
of cells and sensitive to noxious
stimuli. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) usually reflects whether
mitochondria are healthy, which further indicates whether cells are
suffering from noxious damage. Rh-123 staining is a useful tool to
observe MMP. Figure A shows that under normal conditions H9c2 cells had bright green
fluorescence. When cells were preconditioned with cysteine (480 μM)
for 1 h and then treated with H2O2 (400 μM)
for 5 h, a dramatic MMP loss was observed, evidenced by weak green
fluorescence, suggesting that H2O2 induced severe
damage to cells and that cysteine (480 μM) did not provide significant
protection (Figure B). However, preconditioning with 160 μM of NSHDs greatly impeded
this MMP loss (Figures C–F) by preserving mitochondrial functions. These results
further confirmed that NSHDs exhibited potent cellular protection
against oxidative injury.
Figure 6
Effects of H2S donors on H2O2-induced
MMP loss in H9c2 cells. (A–E) Rh123 staining followed by photofluorography
to observe MMP in H9c2 cells. (A) Control group. (B) Cells were pretreated
with cysteine (480 μM) for 1 h, then exposed to H2O2 (400 μM) for 5 h. Cells were preconditioned with
160 μM NSHD-1 (C), NSHD-2 (D), and NSHD-6 (E) in the presence of cysteine (480 μM) for
1 h prior to H2O2 treatment. (F) Quantitative
analysis for Rh123 in panels A–E. Mean fluorescence intensities
(MFI) were measured using IMAGEJ software. Data were expressed as
the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 vs the control
group. ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treated group.
Effects of H2S donors on H2O2-induced
MMP loss in H9c2 cells. (A–E) Rh123 staining followed by photofluorography
to observe MMP in H9c2 cells. (A) Control group. (B) Cells were pretreated
with cysteine (480 μM) for 1 h, then exposed to H2O2 (400 μM) for 5 h. Cells were preconditioned with
160 μM NSHD-1 (C), NSHD-2 (D), and NSHD-6 (E) in the presence of cysteine (480 μM) for
1 h prior to H2O2 treatment. (F) Quantitative
analysis for Rh123 in panels A–E. Mean fluorescence intensities
(MFI) were measured using IMAGEJ software. Data were expressed as
the mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 vs the control
group. ‡P < 0.01 vs the H2O2 treated group.
Cardioprotective Effects of NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 in MI/R Injury
Finally, we tested the protective effects
of two representative donors, i.e., NSHD-1 and NSHD-2, against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury
in a murine model system. In these experiments, mice were subjected
to 45 min of left ventricular ischemia followed by 24 h reperfusion. NSHD-1, NSHD-2, or vehicle was administered by
direct intracardiac (i.c.) injection at the time of reperfusion at
different doses. All animal groups displayed similar area-at-risk
per left ventricle (AAR/LV), which means that surgery caused a similar
risk. However, compared to vehicle treated mice, mice receiving NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 displayed a dose-dependent
reduction in infarct size per area-at-risk (INF/AAR), assessed by
2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining (Figure ). A 100 μg/kg bolus
of NSHD-1 maximally reduced INF/AAR by ∼35%. Similarly,
50 μg/kg and 100 μg/kg of NSHD-2 reduced
INF/AAR by ∼50% (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, circulating cardiac troponin
I (TnI) levels, the marker for acute myocardial infarction, were significantly
lowered with NSHD-2 treated animals (p < 0.05 for 50 ug/kg and p < 0.01 for 100
ug/kg) (Figure ).
These results strongly suggest that N-mercapto compounds
are potent H2S donors and may have some pharmacological
benefits in biological systems. In the present study, we injected
these H2S donors directly into the left ventricular cavity
at the time of reperfusion. In the clinical setting, we believe that
these agents could be administered via a number of routes to patients
suffering from an acute myocardial infarction. These compounds could
be administered via intravenous bolus injection or infusion or via
intracoronary injection during coronary catheterization to open the
occluded coronary artery. In previous studies, we have administered
H2S donors into the systemic circulation with excellent
results.[62]
Figure 7
Cardioprotective effects of NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Doses of NSHD-1, NSHD-2, or vehicle were
injected at the time of reperfusion.
(Left) Myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) per left ventricle (AAR/LV) and
infarct per area-at-risk (INF/AAR) were assessed in vehicle (n = 12), NSHD-1 (50 μg/kg) treated animals
(n = 6), and NSHD-1 (100 μg/kg)
treated animals (n = 12). AAR/LV was similar among
all groups. INF/AAR was significantly smaller in the 100 μg/kg
dose treated animals. (Right) Myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) per left
ventricle (AAR/LV) and infarct per area-at-risk (INF/AAR) were assessed
in the vehicle (n = 12), NSHD-2 (50
μg/kg) treated (n = 12), and NSHD-2 (100 μg/kg) treated animals (n = 17). AAR/LV
was similar among all groups. INF/AAR was significantly smaller in
animals treated with either dose.
Figure 8
Blood was collected at 4 h of reperfusion, and circulating cardiac
troponin I levels were measured. Troponin I level was significantly
reduced with either 50 μg/kg or 100 μg/kg of NSHD-2 treatment.
Cardioprotective effects of NSHD-1 and NSHD-2 in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Doses of NSHD-1, NSHD-2, or vehicle were
injected at the time of reperfusion.
(Left) Myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) per left ventricle (AAR/LV) and
infarct per area-at-risk (INF/AAR) were assessed in vehicle (n = 12), NSHD-1 (50 μg/kg) treated animals
(n = 6), and NSHD-1 (100 μg/kg)
treated animals (n = 12). AAR/LV was similar among
all groups. INF/AAR was significantly smaller in the 100 μg/kg
dose treated animals. (Right) Myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) per left
ventricle (AAR/LV) and infarct per area-at-risk (INF/AAR) were assessed
in the vehicle (n = 12), NSHD-2 (50
μg/kg) treated (n = 12), and NSHD-2 (100 μg/kg) treated animals (n = 17). AAR/LV
was similar among all groups. INF/AAR was significantly smaller in
animals treated with either dose.Blood was collected at 4 h of reperfusion, and circulating cardiac
troponin I levels were measured. Troponin I level was significantly
reduced with either 50 μg/kg or 100 μg/kg of NSHD-2 treatment.
Conclusions
In
summary, we have developed a series of H2S donors
based on a N-mercapto template. Their H2S release is triggered by cellular thiols such as cysteine or GSH.
H2S release from these donors can be regulated by structural
modifications. Moreover, we demonstrated that these donors are safe
in cysteine-rich environments. Their protective effects on cellular
oxidative injury and myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury were also
observed. Taken together, our studies demonstrate that N-mercapto species are potent H2S donors and that they
possess potential therapeutic benefits.
Experimental
Procedures
Chemical Synthesis
All solvents were of reagent grade.
THF was freshly distilled from sodium/benzophenone under argon. Reactions
were magnetically stirred and monitored by thin layer chromatography
(TLC) with 0.25 mm precoated silica gel plates. Flash chromatography
was performed with silica gel 60 (particle size 0.040–0.062
mm). Yields refer to chromatographically and spectroscopically pure
compounds, unless otherwise stated. Proton and carbon-13 NMR spectra
were recorded on a 300 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported
relative to chloroform (δ7.26) for 1H NMR and chloroform
(δ77.0) for 13C NMR. The purity of all of the compounds
was at least 95%, determined by LC/MS. Compounds were also characterized
by TLC, melting points, and NMR spectroscopy.
Synthesis of (N-Acylthio)amides (NSHD-1–NSHD-26)
General procedure: thiocarboxylic
acids (1 mmol) were mixed with KOH (5 mmol) in water (10 mL). To this
mixture was added hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic acid (3
mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5
min and then extracted with 15 mL of CH2Cl2 three
times. Organic layers were then combined, dried (by MgSO4), and concentrated to give the crude product S-acylthiohydroxylamines 3. Without further purification, 3 was dissolved
in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) containing acid anhydride (2
mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at room temperature for 12
h. Crude products were precipitated out and collected. Purification
by column chromatography or recrystallization gave the final products.
The characterization data of each donor is provided in the Supporting Information.
Synthesis of 1-(Benzoylthio)-3-phenylureas
(NSHD-27–NSHD-33)
Each freshly
prepared S-acylthiohydroxylamine 3 (1
mmol, see procedure
described above) was mixed with the corresponding phenyl isocyanate
derivative 5 (2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The
crude products were precipitated out and collected. Recrystallization
in CH2Cl2/hexanes gave the final products. The
characterization data of each donor is provided in the Supporting Information.
H2S Measurement
H2S generation
was initiated by adding 100 μL of a donor’s stock solution
(30 mM in THF) into a 30 mL PBS (pH 7.4, 50 mM)/THF (9:1) solution
containing cysteine or GSH (1.0 mM). Then, 1.0 mL of reaction aliquots
were periodically taken and transferred to UV cuvettes containing
MB cocktail (100 μL of zinc acetate (1% w/v), 200 μL of N,N-dimethyl-1,4-phenylenediamine sulfate (20 mM in 7.2
M HCl), and 200 μL of ferric chloride (30 mM in 1.2 M HCl)).
The MB reaction was carried out for 15 min, and the absorbance (670
nm) of the resultant solution was determined using an UV–vis
spectrometer (Thermo Evolution 300). The H2S concentration
of each sample was calculated against a calibration curve, which was
obtained with a series of Na2S solutions.
Product Analysis
NSHD-1 (129 mg 0.5 mmol)
in 2 mL of MeOH was added to a stirred solution of l-cysteine
(605 mg, 5 mmol) in 50 mL of PBS buffer (pH 7.4, 20 mM). After 1 h,
0.1 mL of solution was taken via syringe equipped with a 45 μM
syringe filter, diluted with 0.4 mL of MeOH, and analyzed by HPLC
(Thermo Scientific Surveyor, Hypersil gold column, 4.6 × 100
mm, water/CH3CN 80/20 2 min; 60/40 4 min; 20/80 2 min;
80/20 2 min, flow rate 1 mL/min). Compounds 8, 10, and 12 were identified and quantified as
compared to standard compounds. These compounds were also isolated
from the reaction mixture and characterized. The yields were 80%,
96%, and 95%, respectively.
Cell Culture
H9c2 cells were purchased
from the American
Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured
in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) high glucose
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C
under 5% CO2.
Cell Viability Assay
The cell counting
kit (CCK)-8
(Dojindo Laboratory, Kumamoto, Japan) was applied to measure the cell
viability of H9c2 cells cultured in 96-well plates. After the indicated
cell treatment, 100 μL of CCK-8 solution at 1:10 dilution was
added to each well, and cells were incubated for a further 3 h at
37 °C. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm with a microplate reader
(Tecan Infinite F200, Switzerland). The mean optical density (OD)
of 4 wells in each group was used to calculate cell viability as follows
(experiments were performed in triplicate):
Protective Activities of NSHDs on H2O2-Induced Cellular Damage
H9c2 cells were treated
with NSHD-1, NSHD-2, and NSHD-6 at varied concentrations (40–160 μM) for 1 h in the
presence of cysteine (480 μM). Excess donors and cysteine were
washed away with PBS (pH 7.4). Cells were then incubated with H2O2 (400 μM) for an additional 5 h. The control
group was set up by incubating H9c2 cells with H2O2 (400 μM) only. Cell viability was measured using the
CCK-8 assay. GYY4137 and NaHS were used as positive controls, and
experiments were set up in a similar manner in the absence of cysteine.
Cysteine (480 μM), NBC (160 μM), and BZM (160 μM)
were incubated with cells as well to rule out their effects on cell
viability.
LDH Measurement
The rate of LDH
release was determined
with a commercial LDH kit supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
(Pittsburgh PA, US). Briefly, H9c2 cells were inoculated in a 96-well
plate and grew to about 70% confluence. After the indicated treatments,
50 μL of supernatant per well was carefully removed and transferred
into corresponding wells for the determination of extracellular LDH
levels. Then, 100 μL of DMEM with 2% Triton X-100 was added
to the adherent cells to lyse the cells. Fifty microliters of cell
lysate was transferred to a 96-well plate to determine intracellular
LDH levels. The same volume of prepared reaction mixture was added
to the supernatant or homogenate, separately, and reacted for 10 min
at room temperature by gentle shaking. Stopping solution was added
to stop the reaction. Absorbance was measured at 490 and 600 nm with
a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200, Switzerland). LDH release
rate was calculated as follows (experiments were performed 4 times):
MMP Measurement
Mitochondrial membrane
potential (MMP)
was observed using a fluorescent dye, rhodamine 123 (Rh123), a cell-permeable
cationic dye that preferentially enters the mitochondria based on
the highly negative MMP. Depolarization of MMP usually leads to a
decreased intake of Rh123 and an intracellular weak fluorescence.
After the indicated treatments, 10 mg/L Rh123 was added to cell cultures
for 15 min at 37 °C, and fluorescence was measured over the entire
field of vision using a fluorescent microscope (Advanced Microscopy
Group, Seattle, US). The mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of Rh123
from four random fields was analyzed using IMAGEJ 1.41o software.
Cardioprotective Effects in MI/R Injury
Animals
Male C57BL/6J
mice, 10–12 weeks of age
(Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were used in the present study.
All animals were housed in a temperature-controlled animal facility
with a 12-h light/dark cycle, with water and rodent chow provided ad libitum. All animals received humane care in compliance
with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the National
Society of Medical Research and the Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health.
All animal procedures were approved by the Louisiana State University
Health Science Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion (MI/R) Protocol
Surgical
occlusion of the left coronary artery (LCA), infarct size determination,
and troponin I (TnI) measurements were performed as previously described.[63] C57BL6/J male mice (10–12 weeks of age)
were anesthetized using pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and ketamine (60
mg/kg) and maintained under anesthesia throughout the procedure with
additional administration of pentobarbital (50 mg/kg). Mice were intubated
and mechanically ventilated using a Hugo Sachs type 845 minivent.
A hair removal agent was used to remove the hair on the chest of mice.
The area was then cleaned using betadine and alcohol wipes alternating
3 times. An incision was made proximally left of the midline of the
chest, exposing the second and third ribs. The chest was opened by
cauterizing through the second and third rib. The LCA was visualized,
and using a 7–0 silk suture, a 3–5 mm piece of PE-10
tubing was secured over the LCA, occluding the artery. Mice were subjected
to 45 min of myocardial injury, and at the time of reperfusion, an
injection of vehicle (0.5% THF), NSHD-1 (50 μg/kg
and 100 μg/kg), or NSHD-2 (50 μg/kg) was
given i.c. The chest was closed in layers, closing the muscle layer
first, then the skin. Mice were removed from ventilation once pedal
reflex returned and it was determined that respiration was spontaneous.
Mice were placed in a recovery cage and supplied with 100% O2. Reperfusion was allowed for 24 h, and blood samples for TnI measurements
were taken at 4 h after time of reperfusion. At 24 h of reperfusion,
the LV area at risk (AAR) and infarct size were determined by Evans
blue and 2,3,5-tetrazolium chloride stainin, as previously described.[63]
Drug Preparation
On the day of experimentation,
test
compounds (NSHD-1 or NSHD-2) were diluted
in 0.2 mL of 100% THF solution. For in vivo experiments,
the test compounds were further diluted in sterile saline to final
concentrations of 0.05 or 0.1 mg/mL. Then, various volumes were administered
based on the animals’ weights to obtain the correct dosage.
The resulting concentration of THF in each dosage was 0.5% v/v. The
vehicle consisted of a solution of 0.5% v/v THF in sterile saline.
Cardiac Troponin-I Assay
Blood samples were collected
via a tail vein at 4 h of reperfusion. Cardiac troponin I level was
measured in serum using the Life Diagnostic highsensitivity mousecardiac troponin I ELISA kit (Mouse Cardiac Tn-I ELISA Kit; Life Diagnostics,
West Chester, PA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Authors: Gábor Szabó; Gábor Veres; Tamás Radovits; Domokos Gero; Katalin Módis; Christiane Miesel-Gröschel; Ferenc Horkay; Matthias Karck; Csaba Szabó Journal: Nitric Oxide Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 4.427
Authors: Matthew Whiteman; Ling Li; Peter Rose; Choon-Hong Tan; David B Parkinson; Philip K Moore Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Chadwick R Powell; Jeffrey C Foster; Sarah N Swilley; Kuljeet Kaur; Samantha J Scannelli; Diego Troya; John B Matson Journal: Polym Chem Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 5.582