Literature DB >> 26317119

Model-Updated Image-Guided Neurosurgery Using the Finite Element Method: Incorporation of the Falx Cerebri.

Michael I Miga1, Keith D Paulsen2, Francis E Kennedy3, Alex Hartov, David W Roberts.   

Abstract

Surgeons using neuronavigation have realized the value of image guidance for feature recognition as well as for the precise application of surgical instruments. Recently, there has been a growing concern about the extent of intraoperative misregistration due to tissue deformation. Intraoperative imaging is currently under evaluation but limitations related to cost effectiveness and image clarity have made its wide spread adoption uncertain. As a result, computational model-guided techniques have generated considerable appeal as an alternative approach. In this paper, we report our initial experience with enhancing our brain deformation model by explicitly adding the falx cerebri. The simulations reported show significant differences in subsurface deformation with the falx serving to damp the communication of displacement between hemispheres by as much as 4 mm. Additionally, these calculations, based on a human clinical case, demonstrate that while cortical shift predictions correlate well with various forms of the model (70-80% of surface motion recaptured), substantial differences in subsurface deformation occurs suggesting that subsurface validation of model-guided techniques will be important for advancing this concept.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 26317119      PMCID: PMC4548980          DOI: 10.1007/10704282_98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  14 in total

1.  In vivo quantification of a homogeneous brain deformation model for updating preoperative images during surgery.

Authors:  M I Miga; K D Paulsen; P J Hoopes; F E Kennedy; A Hartov; D W Roberts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Intraoperatively updated neuroimaging using brain modeling and sparse data.

Authors:  D W Roberts; M I Miga; A Hartov; S Eisner; J M Lemery; F E Kennedy; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Intraoperative US in interactive image-guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  R M Comeau; A Fenster; T M Peters
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  A computational model for tracking subsurface tissue deformation during stereotactic neurosurgery.

Authors:  K D Paulsen; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; P J Hoopes; A Hartov; D W Roberts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to update interactive navigation in neurosurgery: method and preliminary experience.

Authors:  C R Wirtz; M M Bonsanto; M Knauth; V M Tronnier; F K Albert; A Staubert; S Kunze
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1997

6.  Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation.

Authors:  M I Miga; K D Paulsen; J M Lemery; S D Eisner; A Hartov; F E Kennedy; D W Roberts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Frameless stereotactic ultrasonography: method and applications.

Authors:  J W Trobaugh; W D Richard; K R Smith; R D Bucholz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy.

Authors:  D L Hill; C R Maurer; R J Maciunas; J A Barwise; J M Fitzpatrick; M Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation.

Authors:  N L Dorward; O Alberti; B Velani; F A Gerritsen; W F Harkness; N D Kitchen; D G Thomas
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5-T interventional MR system: preliminary results.

Authors:  C R Maurer; D L Hill; A J Martin; H Liu; M McCue; D Rueckert; D Lloret; W A Hall; R E Maxwell; D J Hawkes; C L Truwit
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  9 in total

1.  An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: preliminary results.

Authors:  Prashanth Dumpuri; Reid C Thompson; Benoit M Dawant; A Cao; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Intraoperative brain shift compensation: accounting for dural septa.

Authors:  Ishita Chen; Aaron M Coffey; Siyi Ding; Prashanth Dumpuri; Benoit M Dawant; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  In vivo modeling of interstitial pressure in a porcine model: approximation of poroelastic properties and effects of enhanced anatomical structure modeling.

Authors:  Saramati Narasimhan; Jared A Weis; Hernán F J González; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Automatic falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli segmentation from Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Jeffrey Glaister; Aaron Carass; Dzung L Pham; John A Butman; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Model-Based Image Updating for Brain Shift in Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement Surgery.

Authors:  Chen Li; Xiaoyao Fan; Jennifer Hong; David W Roberts; Joshua P Aronson; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Accounting for Deformation in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With Models: Comparison to Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Paul S Larson; Alastair J Martin; Michael I Miga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Data assimilation using a gradient descent method for estimation of intraoperative brain deformation.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; Alex Hartov; David Roberts; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.

Authors:  Erik G Lee; Priyam Rastogi; Ravi L Hadimani; David C Jiles; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Simulation of brain tumors in MR images for evaluation of segmentation efficacy.

Authors:  Marcel Prastawa; Elizabeth Bullitt; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 8.545

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.