Literature DB >> 23415511

Prevalence and effect of myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Israel M Barbash1, Danny Dvir, Itsik Ben-Dor, Salem Badr, Petros Okubagzi, Rebecca Torguson, Paul J Corso, Zhenyi Xue, Lowell F Satler, Augusto D Pichard, Ron Waksman.   

Abstract

The incidence and prognostic implication of myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been consistently studied. We aimed to assess the incidence and extent of myocardial injury after TAVR performed using transfemoral and transapical approaches. The clinical data from patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR were retrospectively analyzed. The myocardial necrosis markers cardiac troponin I and creatine kinase (CK)-MB were assessed during hospitalization. Of the 150 TAVR patients, 95% and 50% had an abnormally elevated cardiac troponin I and CK-MB level, respectively. The transapical patients had significantly greater elevations of both cardiac troponin I (13.8 ± 14.0 vs 2.5 ± 5.8 ng/ml, p <0.001) and CK-MB (28.4 ± 24.2 vs 7.4 ± 8.6 ng/ml, p ≤0.001). On receiver operating curve analysis, postprocedural CK-MB (twofold increase) had high predictive power for 30-day mortality (area under the curve 0.85, p <0.001). Patients with high CK-MB levels had greater rates of postprocedural kidney injury (22% vs 6%, p = 0.026), in-hospital (22% vs 0%, p <0.001), 30-day (27% vs 1.5%, p <0.001), and 1-year mortality (41% vs 18%, p = 0.01). Baseline renal failure and no β-blocker treatment on admission were independent predictors of an elevated postprocedural CK-MB level. In conclusion, a cardiac biomarker increase after TAVR was common and more frequent among transapical access patients. A twofold increase (>7 ng/ml) in CK-MB after transfemoral TAVR was a surrogate for poor long-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415511     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

1.  Preventing brain embolism by using a modified isolation technique in transcatheter aortic valve implantation for a patient with shaggy and porcelain aorta.

Authors:  Yoshikatsu Nomura; Motoharu Kawashima; Kanetsugu Nagao; Shota Hasegawa; Takanori Tsujimoto; So Izumi; Masamichi Matsumori; Tasuku Honda; Kenzo Uzu; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Takahiro Sawada; Tetsuari Onishi; Yoshinori Yasaka; Hirohisa Murakami; Nobuhiko Mukohara
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  A longer total duration of rapid ventricular pacing does not increase the risk of postprocedural myocardial injury in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Kenta Okitsu; Takeshi Iritakenishi; Tatsuyuki Imada; Mitsuo Iwasaki; Sho Carl Shibata; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Predictors and Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Murat Can Guney; Telat Keles; Bilge Duran Karaduman; Huseyin Ayhan; Hakan Suygun; Muzaffer Kahyaoglu; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Clinical and Functional Outcomes Associated With Myocardial Injury After Transfemoral and Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Subanalysis From the PARTNER Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves).

Authors:  Jean-Michel Paradis; Hersh S Maniar; John M Lasala; Susheel Kodali; Mathew Williams; Brian R Lindman; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon; Raj R Makkar; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis Babaliaros; Ke Xu; Girma Minalu Ayele; Lars Svensson; Martin B Leon; Alan Zajarias
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  Does the transapical approach impair early recovery of systolic strain following transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Anthony A Holmes; Cynthia C Taub; Joseph J DeRose; David P Slovut
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 6.  Mechanisms and management of TAVR-related complications.

Authors:  Amir-Ali Fassa; Dominique Himbert; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Myocardial injury associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Arnaud van Linden; Johannes Blumenstein; Luise Gaede; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Vascular Imaging Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Why and How?

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Russell D Rosenberg; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; Akos Varga-Szemes; Daniel H Steinberg; Andrea Laghi; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Echocardiographic evaluation of myocardial strain in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Tomasz Bochenek; Blazej Kusz; Magdalena Mizia; Michal Lelek; Maciej Turski; Krystian Wita; Andrzej Ochała; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  Post-Procedural Troponin Elevation and Clinical Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Konstantinos C Koskinas; Stefan Stortecky; Anna Franzone; Crochan J O'Sullivan; Fabien Praz; Katazyrna Zuk; Lorenz Räber; Thomas Pilgrim; Aris Moschovitis; Georg M Fiedler; Peter Jüni; Dik Heg; Peter Wenaweser; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.