| Literature DB >> 26309735 |
Xiaoyu Li1, Lili Wang1, Yuhong Zhen2, Shuying Li3, Yongping Xu1.
Abstract
In recent years, the use of in-feed antibiotics for growth and disease prevention in livestock production has been under severe scrutiny. The use and misuse of in-feed antibiotics has led to problems with drug residues in animal products and increased bacterial resistance. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) have attracted considerable attention as an alternative to antibiotics to maintain swine health and performance. Oral administration of IgY possesses many advantages over mammalian IgG such as cost-effectiveness, convenience and high yield. This review presents an overview of the potential to use IgY immunotherapy for the prevention and treatment of swine diarrhea diseases and speculates on the future of IgY technology. Included are a review of the potential applications of IgY in the control of enteric infections of either bacterial or viral origin such as enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., rotavirus, porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus, and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Some potential obstacles to the adoption of IgY technology are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Diarrhea; Disease control; Egg yolk antibodies; IgY; Swine
Year: 2015 PMID: 26309735 PMCID: PMC4549021 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-015-0038-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Fig. 1Possible primary mode of action by which IgY protects pigs against E coli K88 induced diarrhea. Modified from Hatta et al. [85]
Effect of IgY against diarrhea caused by bacterial pathogens in piglets
| Items | Mortality, % | Outcome measure considered-Mortality (M) or Diarrhea (D) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||
| Prophylactic effect | |||||
| Ref. | Pathogens | Piglet age | |||
| Imberechts et al. [ | F18+ ETEC | Weaned (21–28 d) | 33 | 66 | D |
| F18+ ETEC | Weaned (21–28 d) | 25 | 75 | D | |
| F18+ ETEC | Weaned (21–28 d) | 0 | 25 | M | |
| Marquardt et al. [ | K88+ ETEC | Neonatal (3-day-old) | 12.5 | 62.5 | M |
| K88+ ETEC | Weaned (21-day-old) | 0 | 30 | M | |
| K88+ ETEC | Weaning (14-18-days-old) | 1.9 | 3.9 | D | |
| Owsu-Asiedu et al. [ | K88+, F18+, F41+ ETEC | Early-weaned (10-day-old) | 30 | 73 | D |
| ETEC K88+, F18, F41 | Early-weaned (10-day-old) | 33 | 100 | D | |
| Owsu-Asiedu et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Early-weaned (10 ± 1 days old) | 6.6 | 40 | M |
| Owsu-Asiedu et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Early-weaned (10-day-old) | 0 | 33 | M |
| Chernysheva et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Newly weaned (about 22-day-old) | 66 | 58.3 | D |
| Chu et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Neonatal (3-day-old) | 16.7 | 66.7 | M |
| Li et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Weaned (40-day-old) | 0 | 75 | D |
| Therapeutic effect | |||||
| Ref. | Pathogens | Piglet age | |||
| Yokoyama et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 86 | M |
| K99 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 100 | M | |
| 987P + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 80 | M | |
| Yokoyama et al. [ | F18+ ETEC | Weaned (28-day-old) | 0 | 11 | D |
| Yang et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 85.7 | M |
| K99 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 100 | M | |
| 987P + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 80 | M | |
| Xu et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 33.3 | M |
| K99 + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 66.7 | M | |
| 987P + ETEC | Newborn | 0 | 50 | M | |
| Chu et al. [ | K88 + ETEC | Weaned (21-day-old) | 0 | 25 | M |
Effect of IgY against diarrhea caused by viral pathogens in piglets
| Items | Mortality, % | Outcome measure considered-Mortality (M) or Diarrhea (D) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||
| Prophylactic effect | |||||
| Ref. | Pathogens | Piglet age | |||
| Kweon et al. [ | PEDV | Neonatal (3-day-old) | 26 | 58 | M |
| PEDV | Neonatal (3-day-old) | 41 | 71 | M | |
| PEDV | Neonatal (3-day-old) | 50 | 66 | M | |
| Zuo et al. [ | TGEV | Newborn | 12.5 | 57 | M |
| Vega et al. [ | Human Rotavirus | Neonatal (1-day-old) | 0 | 100 | D |
| Therapeutic effect | |||||
| Ref. | Pathogens | Piglet age | |||
| Song et al. [ | PEDV | Neonatal (1-day-old) | 16.7 | 100 | M |
| Cui et al. [ | TGEV, PEDV | Neonatal (1-day-old) | 0 | 100 | M |
Effect of IgY, zinc oxide, fumaric acid and antibiotics on the performance and intestinal morphology of 10 to 24 day old pigs fed diets based on pea protein concentrate
| Items | Control | IgY | Zinc oxide | Fumaric acid | Carbadox | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight gain, g/d | 100.9 | 151.2 | 158.9 | 155.4 | 152.6 | 16.6 |
| Feed intake, g/d | 141.0 | 208.1 | 214.7 | 211.6 | 222.4 | 15.3 |
| Feed conversion | 1.39 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.36 | 1.45 | 0.04 |
| Scour score | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | - |
| Mortality, % | 40.0 | 6.6 | 13.3 | 6.6 | 13.3 | - |
| Villus height, m | 355 | 564 | 488 | 573 | 570 | 20.0 |
| Crypt depth, m | 204 | 183 | 190 | 207 | 204 | 10.1 |
| Villous height/crypt depth | 1.7 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.11 |
Owusu-Asiedu et al. [37]
Effect of EGG, EGG-X, or SDPP on performance, plasma urea and pancreas weight of weaned pigs fed diets based on corn-soybean meal1
| Items | Control | EGG | EGG-X | SDPP | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight gain, g/d | |||||
| d 0-14 | 124b | 151ab | 128b | 185a | 12.4 |
| d 14-25 | 332 | 425 | 349 | 398 | 25.9 |
| Feed intake, g/d | |||||
| d 0-14 | 191 | 219 | 197 | 222 | 12.3 |
| d 14-25 | 530b | 655a | 583ab | 610ab | 37.4 |
| Feed conversion | |||||
| d 0-14 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.18 | 0.067 |
| d 14-25 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.67 | 1.54 | 0.033 |
| Plasma urea N, mmol/L | |||||
| d 0-14 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.34 |
| d 14-25 | 3.4a | 3.0b | 3.6a | 2.6b | 0.22 |
| Pancreas, g/kg of body weight | 1.07b | 1.22ab | 1.34a | 1.08b | 0.071 |
Heo et al. [39]
1EGG, egg yolk obtained from hens immunized with ETEC K88 antigens; EGG-X, 650.0 g/kg normal egg and 350.0 g/kg inulin; SDPP, spray dried porcine plasma
abMeans in a row followed by same or no letter do not differ (P > 0.05)
Effect of encapsulated IgY on performance and the incidence of diarrhea in pigs challenged with K88+ ETEC1
| Items | No. of pigs | Percentage of pigs with diarrhea after specific times (Fecal score in brackets2) | Weight gain, g3 | Recovery rate, (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||||
| Negative control, unchallenged | 4 | 0 % (0.5) | 0 % (0) | 0 % (0.4) | 0 % (0) | +1400 ± 129a | —— |
| Positive control | 4 | 75 % (2.5) | 75 % (2.5) | 75 % (2.0) | 75 % (2.0) | −162.5 ± 25d | 0 % |
| Non-encapsulated IgY | 4 | 100 % (2.0) | 75 % (1.3) | 25 % (1.0) | 0 % (0) | +937.5 ± 111b | 100 % |
| Microencapsulated IgY | 4 | 75 % (2.0) | 0 % (0) | 0 % (0) | 0 % (0) | +1325 ± 119a | 100 % |
| Aureomycin | 4 | 100 % (2.0) | 50 % (2.0) | 75 % (1.5) | 50 % (1.5) | +650 ± 71c | 50 % |
Li et al. [83]
1All pigs except negative control were orally challenged with 5 mL of viable E. coli K88 organisms (1011 cfu/mL per pig) at time 0 h. Challenged pigs were left untreated (positive control) or treated three times (−1, 4 and 9 h after bacterial challenge) on the first day and twice a day for two consecutive days each time with 0.4 g non-encapsulated IgY, 2 g of microencapsulated IgY (equivalent to 0.4 g of IgY) or 0.25 g of aureomycin. Diarrhea and weight gain were assessed for 3 days after challenge
2FC score is the mean fecal consistency score: 0, normal; 1, soft feces; 2, mild diarrhea; 3, severe diarrhea. Pigs with a fecal score of < 1 were considered not to have diarrhea
3Means in a column followed by same or no letter do not differ (P > 0.05)