| Literature DB >> 21787857 |
Yongping Xu1, Xiaoyu Li, Liji Jin, Yuhong Zhen, Yanan Lu, Shuying Li, Jiansong You, Linhui Wang.
Abstract
Oral administration of chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) has attracted considerable attention as a means of controlling infectious diseases of bacterial and viral origin. Oral administration of IgY possesses many advantages compared with mammalian IgG including cost-effectiveness, convenience and high yield. This review presents an overview of the potential to use IgY immunotherapy for the prevention and treatment of terrestrial and aquatic animal diseases and speculates on the future of IgY technology. Included are a review of the potential application of IgY for the treatment of livestock diseases such as mastitis and diarrhea, poultry diseases such as Salmonella, Campylobacteriosis, infectious bursal disease and Newcastle disease, as well as aquatic diseases like shrimp white spot syndrome virus, Yersina ruckeri and Edwardsiella tarda. Some potential obstacles to the adoption of IgY technology are also discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21787857 PMCID: PMC7126572 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Adv ISSN: 0734-9750 Impact factor: 14.227
Comparison of the characteristics of mammalian IgG and chicken IgY.
| Parameter | Mammalian IgG | Chicken IgY |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody sampling | Invasive | Non-invasive |
| Source of antibody | Blood serum | Egg yolk |
| Antibody amount | 200 mg IgG/bleed (40 ml blood) | 50–100 mg IgY/egg (300 eggs/year) |
| Frequency of collection | Every two weeks | Every day |
| Amount of antibody/year | 5200 mg | 22,500 mg |
| Amount of specific antibody | ~ 5% | 2–10% |
| Protein–A/G binding | Yes | No |
| Interference with mammalian IgG | Yes | No |
| Interference with rheumatoid factor | Yes | No |
| Activation of mammalian complement | Yes | No |
Fig. 1Structure of IgG and IgY.
Investigations on the use of specific IgY for the control of enteric diseases.
| Pathogens | Effects of IgY | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Rotavirus | Protecting calves from bovine rotavirus-induced diarrhea | |
| Preventing murine rotavirus in mice | ||
| Preventing human rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis in mice | ||
| Prevention and treatment of rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis in murine model | ||
| Prevention of rotavirus infection in vitro, using IgY against recombinant HRV coat protein, VP8* | ||
| Coronavirus | Protecting neonatal calves from bovine coronavirus (BCV)-induced diarrhea | |
| Preventing K88+, K99+, 987P + ETEC infection in neonatal piglets | ||
| Protecting neonatal calves from fatal enteric colibacillosis by K99-pilated ETEC | ||
| Inhibiting adhesion of ETEC K88 to piglet intestinal mucus | ||
| Prevention of ETEC K88+ infection in neonatal and early weaned piglets | ||
| Protecting mice challenged with | ||
| Preventing fatal salmonellosis in neonatal calves exposed to | ||
| Inhibiting adhesion of | ||
| Protection of rainbow trout against | ||
| Preventing Edwardsiellosis of Japanese eels infected with | ||
| IBDV | Protecting chicks from infectious bursal disease virus | |
| Inhibiting the production of | ||
| Inhibiting the growth of |
Investigations on the use of specific IgY in the control of non-enteric diseases.
| Pathogens | Effects of IgY | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Protecting rats from | ||
| Snake venoms | Neutralizing the toxic and lethal components of the venoms | |
| SARS coronavirus | Prevention of SARS-coronavirus infection in vitro | |
| Avian influenza virus | Protecting birds from avian influenza Subtype H9N2 |
Comparison of IgY and penicillin for the treatment of experimental and clinical mastitis caused by S. aureusa.
| Treatment | Experimental mastitis | Clinical mastitis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of mastitic quarters | No. of cured quarters | No. of mastitic quarters | No. of cured quarters | |
| IgY | 6 | 5 (83.3%) | 6 | 3 (50.0%) |
| Penicillin | 6 | 4 (66.7%) | 6 | 2 (33.3%) |
| No treatment | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
p < 0.05 compared with no treatment in the same group.
Ten milliliters of IgY, at a concentration of 20 mg ml− 1, or penicillin, at a concentration of 100 mg ml− 1, were infused into the mammary glands immediately after the cow's morning and evening milking for six consecutive days.
Mammary glands selected for clinical mastitis treatment met the following criteria: obvious clinical signs of mastitis were detected, S. aureus counts of the milk samples were 100–200 CFU ml− 1, somatic cell counts were more than 5 × 105 cells ml− 1.
Mammary glands selected for inducing experimental mastitis met the following criteria: no clinical signs of mastitis were detected, S. aureus counts of the milk were less than 10 CFU ml− 1 and no other bacteria were detected, somatic cell counts were less than 1 × 105 CFU ml− 1. Experimental mastitis was induced by mammary infusion with 107 CFU ml− 1 of S. aureus.
Clinical response of 21-day-old pigs after challenge with ETEC K88+ MB and treatment with egg-yolk antibodies.
| Treatment | No. of pigs | No. of pigs with diarrhea (FC score | Weight gain (g) | % of pigs dead | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||||
| 10 | 3/10 | 8/10 | 4/7 | − 36.2 | 30.0% | |
| (1.0) | (2.0) | (3.0) | ||||
| 10 | 5/10 | 0/10 | 1/10 | + 90.6 | 0.0% | |
| (1.6) | (0.0) | (0.5) | ||||
All the 21-day-old piglets were challenged orally two times (at 0 and 5 h) with a dose of 1012 CFU ml− 1 of viable organism per piglet. Piglets in the E. coli challenged + IgY group were treated with 0.5 g of egg yolk antibodies, three times a day (− 1, 4 and 9 h after the first ETEC challenge) for the first day and once a day for the next two days after the first ETEC challenge.
FC score is the mean fecal consistency score: 0, normal; 1, soft feces; 2, mild diarrhea; 3, severe diarrhea. Pigs with a fecal score of ≤ 1 were considered not to have diarrhea.
Clinical response of calves to challenge exposure with bovine coronavirus and subsequent treatment with egg yolk powder.
| Group | Antibody titer | No. diarrhea/total no. (%) | No. dead/total no. (%) | Cumulative fecal score | Weight gain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 4/4 (100) | 4/4 (100) | 30.5 ± 6.1 | − 7.4 ± 2.3 |
| Egg powder | 1280 | 3/4 (75) | 2/4 (50) | 20.0 ± 7.4 | − 5.1 ± 10.4 |
| Egg powder | 2560 | 3/4 (50) | 0/4 (0) | 3.8 ± 3.8 | 6.3 ± 2.4 |
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Effect of specific IgY on the concentration of Salmonella in the cecum of broiler chickens.
| Age of bird | Log10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | IgY | |
| Day 21 | 5.26b | 1.23a |
| Day 28 | 3.98b | 0.27a |
a,b Means in the same row lacking a common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.01).
Rate of Salmonella isolation in eggs laid by hens after oral application of IgY egg powder.
| Parts | % Eggs with | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IgY | Control | p value | |
| Whole eggs | 13.3 | 29.4 | |
| Egg shell | 13.3 | 29.2 | |
| Albumen | 0.3 | 0.5 | n.s. |
| Yolk | 0.6 | 2.4 | |
Fig. 2Effect of IgY on the survival rate of shrimp challenged with white spot syndrome virus.