Literature DB >> 26308674

Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.

Milka Marinova1, Bob Edon1,2, Karsten Wolter1, Barbara Katsimbari1, Hans H Schild1, Holger M Strunk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of computed tomography (CT) attenuation measurements for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and predicting osteoporosis in thoracic and abdominal CT scans for various clinical indications using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference standard. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 234 patients (147 women, 87 men) undergoing DXA and CT were examined retrospectively. Mean time between both studies was 0.5 years. CT-attenuation values in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured at the thoracic and lumbar spine (T1, T6, T12, L1-L5), at the femoral neck, and then assigned to their corresponding DXA scores.
RESULTS: Patients with DXA-defined osteoporosis or osteopenia showed significantly lower HU values of trabecular bone at all measured levels compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.001). HU values were highest at T1 and T6, lowest at L1-L3 and the femoral neck. There were no significant intraindividual differences between HU values in the sagittal, coronal or transversal plane. Significant differences between normal and abnormal BMD categories were verified for three CT scanners. More than half of all fractures were detected in patients with non-osteoporotic DXA T-scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal and particularly thoracic CT scans obtained for other clinical indications can sensibly be applied toward determining low BMD, detecting osteoporosis and identifying persons at increased fracture risk. Osteoporotic morbidity and mortality might be minimized. Superiorly to DXA, fragility fractures can be found without additional imaging or radiation exposure which can initiate early adequate treatment. LIMITATIONS: Key limitations of the study were as following: a retrospective, single-center study; small patient cohort - larger cohorts are needed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic performance measurements; more complex CT evaluation of the hip for BMD assessment; DXA measurements were used as a reference standard, however, patients with unsuspected compression fractures but showing osteopenic or even normal BMD outline the limitations of DXA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; CT scans; DXA; Fragility fractures; Hounsfield units; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26308674     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1074892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  20 in total

1.  CT-based evaluation of volumetric bone density in fragility fractures of the pelvis-a matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  D Schönenberg; R Guggenberger; D Frey; H-C Pape; H-P Simmen; G Osterhoff
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Investigating comparability of quantitative computed tomography with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density of patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Haghighat Khah; Nahid Moradi; Taher Taheri; Morteza Sanei Taheri; Seyed Mansoor Rayegani
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Characterization of Chest Wall Toxicity During Long-term Follow Up After Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Chipko; Julius Ojwang; Leila Rezai Gharai; Xiaoyan Deng; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04

4.  Posterior pelvic ring bone density with implications for percutaneous screw fixation.

Authors:  Jonathan G Eastman; Trevor J Shelton; Milton Lee Chip Routt; Mark R Adams
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 5.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Computed Tomography: State of the Art and Argument for Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver; Robert J Ward; John M Boone; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Low volumetric bone density is a risk factor for early complications after spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Daniel L Christensen; Kyle E Nappo; Jared A Wolfe; Sean M Wade; Daniel I Brooks; Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Scott M Tintle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Application of three-dimensional reconstruction simulation to define the starting point of lumbar cortical bone trajectory].

Authors:  Zhen Huang; Ning Sun; Jiabin Ren; Rui Li; Xin Liu; Yuefei Li; Jingwei Bi; Zhaozhong Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

9.  Antiresorptive drug-related changes of the mandibular bone densitiy in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw patients.

Authors:  Nils Heim; Werner Götz; Franz-Josef Kramer; Anton Faron
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Vertebral Imaging in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: a Clinician's Perspective.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.