Fisnik Jashari1, Pranvera Ibrahimi2, Elias Johansson3,4, Jan Ahlqvist5, Conny Arnerlöv6, Maria Garoff7, Eva Levring Jäghagen8, Per Wester9, Michael Y Henein10. 1. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. fisnik.jashari@medicin.umu.se. 2. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. pranvera.ibrahimi@medicin.umu.se. 3. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. elias.johansson@umu.se. 4. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. elias.johansson@umu.se. 5. Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. jan.ahlqvist@umu.se. 6. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. conny.arnerlov@vll.se. 7. Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. maria.garoff@umu.se. 8. Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. eva.levring.jaghagen@umu.se. 9. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. per.wester@medicin.umu.se. 10. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden. michael.henein@medicin.umu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Arterial calcification is often detected on ultrasound examination but its diagnostic accuracy is not well validated. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of carotid ultrasound B mode findings in detecting atherosclerotic calcification quantified by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: We analyzed 94 carotid arteries, from 88 patients (mean age 70 ± 7 years, 33% females), who underwent pre-endarterectomy ultrasound examination. Plaques with high echogenic nodules and posterior shadowing were considered calcified. After surgery, the excised plaques were examined using CBCT, from which the calcification volume (mm3) was calculated. In cases with multiple calcifications the largest calcification nodule volume was used to represent the plaque. Carotid artery calcification by the two imaging techniques was compared using conventional correlations. RESULTS: Carotid ultrasound was highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcification; with a sensitivity of 88.2%. Based on the quartile ranges of calcification volumes measured by CBCT we have divided plaque calcification into four groups: <8; 8-35; 36-70 and >70 mm3. Calcification volumes ≥8 were accurately detectable by ultrasound with a sensitivity of 96%. Of the 21 plaques with <8 mm3 calcification volume; only 13 were detected by ultrasound; resulting in a sensitivity of 62%. There was no difference in the volume of calcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Carotid ultrasound is highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcified atherosclerotic lesions of volume ≥8 mm3; but less accurate in detecting smaller volume calcified plaques. Further development of ultrasound techniques should allow better detection of early arterial calcification.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Arterial calcification is often detected on ultrasound examination but its diagnostic accuracy is not well validated. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of carotid ultrasound B mode findings in detecting atherosclerotic calcification quantified by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: We analyzed 94 carotid arteries, from 88 patients (mean age 70 ± 7 years, 33% females), who underwent pre-endarterectomy ultrasound examination. Plaques with high echogenic nodules and posterior shadowing were considered calcified. After surgery, the excised plaques were examined using CBCT, from which the calcification volume (mm3) was calculated. In cases with multiple calcifications the largest calcification nodule volume was used to represent the plaque. Carotid artery calcification by the two imaging techniques was compared using conventional correlations. RESULTS: Carotid ultrasound was highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcification; with a sensitivity of 88.2%. Based on the quartile ranges of calcification volumes measured by CBCT we have divided plaque calcification into four groups: <8; 8-35; 36-70 and >70 mm3. Calcification volumes ≥8 were accurately detectable by ultrasound with a sensitivity of 96%. Of the 21 plaques with <8 mm3 calcification volume; only 13 were detected by ultrasound; resulting in a sensitivity of 62%. There was no difference in the volume of calcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Carotid ultrasound is highly accurate in detecting the presence of calcified atherosclerotic lesions of volume ≥8 mm3; but less accurate in detecting smaller volume calcified plaques. Further development of ultrasound techniques should allow better detection of early arterial calcification.
Authors: Brajesh K Lal; Robert W Hobson; Peter J Pappas; Richard Kubicka; Meera Hameed; Elie Y Chakhtoura; Zafar Jamil; Frank T Padberg; Paul B Haser; Walter N Durán; Ellie Y Chakhtura Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Suzette E Elias-Smale; Arlette E Odink; Renske G Wieberdink; Albert Hofman; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler; Aad van der Lugt; Jacqueline C M Witteman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: M Miralles; J Merino; M Busto; X Perich; C Barranco; F Vidal-Barraquer Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: M Slevin; Q Wang; M Angels Font; A Luque; Oriol Juan-Babot; J Gaffney; P Kumar; S Kumar; L Badimon; J Krupinski Journal: Pathobiology Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: S Chaturvedi; A Bruno; T Feasby; R Holloway; O Benavente; S N Cohen; R Cote; D Hess; J Saver; J D Spence; B Stern; J Wilterdink Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: A J Grau; C Weimar; F Buggle; A Heinrich; M Goertler; S Neumaier; J Glahn; T Brandt; W Hacke; H C Diener Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Erol Baskurt; Klaus D Hagspiel; Michael Finch; C Douglas Phillips; Sirisha R Bollampally; Christopher M Kramer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C Denzel; M Lell; M Maak; M Höckl; K Balzer; K-M Müller; C Fellner; F A Fellner; W Lang Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Jonathon W Homeister; Melissa C Caughey; Yue Wang; Hongtu Zhu; Benjamin Y Huang; Ellie R Lee; Carlos A Zamora; Mark A Farber; Joseph J Fulton; Peter F Ford; William A Marston; Raghuveer Vallabhaneni; Timothy C Nichols; Caterina M Gallippi Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Deborah D Chin; Jonathan Wang; Margot Mel de Fontenay; Anastasia Plotkin; Gregory A Magee; Eun Ji Chung Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 6.331