Literature DB >> 26304956

Appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Are they appropriate for women?

Rami Doukky1,2, Kathleen Hayes3, Nathan Frogge3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that women are more likely to receive inappropriate SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), suggesting gender disparity in AUC determination. We investigated the impact of gender on the diagnostic and prognostic utility of AUC. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed a multi-site prospective cohort of 1511 consecutive patients (43.5% women) who underwent outpatient, community-based SPECT-MPI. Subjects were stratified into gender groups and appropriateness subgroups, and followed for 27 ± 10 months for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization. Women were more likely to receive inappropriate MPI (60.7% vs 33.8%, P < .001). Irrespective of appropriateness, women were less likely to have an abnormal MPI (6.1% vs 14.9%, P < .001), even after adjusting for clinical covariates [odds ratio = 0.40 (95% confidence interval = 0.26-0.60), P < .001]. Irrespective of appropriateness, women were at lower risk for MACE (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) after adjusting for clinical and imaging covariates [hazard ratio = 0.49 (95% confidence interval = 0.28-0.86), P = .01]. There was no interaction between gender and appropriateness group as a determinant of abnormal MPI or MACE (interaction P values ≥ .26), indicating that female gender was associated with similar relative risk of an abnormal MPI and MACE irrespective of appropriateness group. Abnormal MPI was similarly predictive of increased hazard of MACE in both genders, regardless of appropriateness (interaction P values ≥ .46).
CONCLUSION: In this multi-site cohort, there was no demonstrable gender-based differential impact of AUC on the diagnostic or prognostic utility of SPECT-MPI. The study validates the methods used in determining risk in the AUC algorithm and endorses the widespread application of AUC in men and women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPECT; appropriate use criteria (AUC); gender disparity; myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); outcome; women

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26304956     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0233-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aarti Gupta; Sarah V Tsiaras; Shira I Dunsiger; Peter L Tilkemeier
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging is a strong predictor of death in women.

Authors:  Mario Sergio Julio Cerci; Juliano Julio Cerci; Rodrigo Julio Cerci; Carlos Cunha Pereira Neto; Evelinda Trindade; Dominique Delbeke; Claudio L Pereira da Cunha; João Vicente Vitola
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

4.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Utilization management of cardiovascular imaging pre-certification and appropriateness.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03

6.  The revolution and evolution of appropriateness in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Does risk for major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing vasodilator stress with adjunctive exercise differ from patients undergoing either standard exercise or vasodilator stress with myocardial perfusion imaging?

Authors:  Sanjeev U Nair; Alan W Ahlberg; Deborah M Katten; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Martha Gulati; Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Thomas C Gerber; Sharonne N Hayes; Christopher M Kramer; James K Min; L Kristin Newby; J V Ian Nixon; Monvadi B Srichai; Patricia A Pellikka; Rita F Redberg; Nanette K Wenger; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prognostic implications of stress modality on mortality risk and cause of death in patients undergoing office-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marie-France Poulin; Sarah Alexander; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Raffaelle Bugiardini; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

1.  The feminine mystique of AUC.

Authors:  Regina S Druz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in women for the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease-state-of-the-evidence and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Sharmila Dorbala; David Wolinsky; Brian Abbott; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Jennifer H Mieres; Lawrence M Phillips; Nanette K Wenger; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Differential Impact of Appropriate Use Criteria on the Association between Age and an Abnormal Stress Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; Rami Doukky
Journal:  Cardiovasc Innov Appl       Date:  2019-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.