Literature DB >> 21516377

Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Aarti Gupta1, Sarah V Tsiaras, Shira I Dunsiger, Peter L Tilkemeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) were developed to guide the use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). While MPI use has grown exponentially, women remain under tested. Given this bias in testing, we sought to determine if gender disparity exists in tests categorized by appropriateness and the role of referral bias.
METHODS: The AUC were applied to 314 consecutive MPI. Analysis of variance and chi-squared tests were used for analysis. Gender disparity was assessed using correlation matrices comparing baseline to gender reversed data.
RESULTS: Of the 314 studies, 263 were appropriate, 34 inappropriate, and 17 uncertain. Women had 68% of inappropriate studies, and 82% of uncertain studies (P < .01). Cardiologists ordered more appropriate studies than primary care physicians (PCPs) in women (86% vs 71%, P = .04). Among studies ordered by cardiologists and PCPs, a higher percentage of studies were appropriate in men vs women (96% vs 86%, P = 0.05 and 88% vs 71% P = .003), respectively. Gender reversal demonstrates disparity in the AUC tool with 46 (15%) not correlating (P < .00001).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparing patient gender and ordering physician, the majority of inappropriate and uncertain studies were ordered in women by PCPs, indicating a continuing need for education among PCPs, particularly as the AUC apply to women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516377     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9368-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  9 in total

1.  Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Michael A DeLorenzo; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Educational initiatives for quality improvement projects: can you teach an old dog new tricks?

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Appropriate use criteria for stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies: a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; J Wells Askew; David Hodge; Beth Kaping; Damita J Carryer; Todd Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Manuel Cerqueira; Pamela S Douglas; Karen C Caruth; Joseph M Allen; Neil C Jensen; Wenqin Pan; Ralph Brindis; Michael Wolk
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina.

Authors:  V L Roger; M E Farkouh; S A Weston; G S Reeder; S J Jacobsen; A R Zinsmeister; B P Yawn; S L Kopecky; S E Gabriel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Validation of the accuracy of pretest and exercise test scores in women with a low prevalence of coronary disease: the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study.

Authors:  Anthony P Morise; Marian B Olson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Sunil Mankad; William J Rogers; Carl J Pepine; Steven E Reis; Barry L Sharaf; George Sopko; Karen Smith; Gerald M Pohost; Leslee Shaw
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rupa Mehta; R Parker Ward; Sonal Chandra; Richa Agarwal; Kim Allan Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L J Shaw; D D Miller; J C Romeis; D Kargl; L T Younis; B R Chaitman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Tests that may be overused or misused in cardiology: the Choosing Wisely campaign.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The feminine mystique of AUC.

Authors:  Regina S Druz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  AUC for SPECT: is gender bias inappropriate.

Authors:  Rupa Mehta; Kim Allan Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The time and place for appropriate radionuclide imaging: now and everywhere.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Can physicians identify inappropriate nuclear stress tests? An examination of inter-rater reliability for the 2009 appropriate use criteria for radionuclide imaging.

Authors:  Siqin Ye; LeRoy E Rabbani; Christopher R Kelly; Maureen R Kelly; Matthew Lewis; Yehuda Paz; Clara L Peck; Shaline Rao; Sabahat Bokhari; Shepard D Weiner; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-01-06

6.  A multicenter evaluation of the appropriate use of single-photon emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in Greece.

Authors:  Efstratios Moralidis; Nafsika Papadimitriou; Maria Stathaki; Xanthi Xourgia; Tryfon Spyridonidis; Andreas Fotopoulos; Dimitrios Apostolopoulos; Nikolaos Karkavitsas; Anna Gotzamani-Psarrakou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The value and appropriateness of positron emission tomography: an evolving tale.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Clinician-dependent variations in inappropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging: training, specialty, and location.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Joseph Hymas; Ryan Meral; Daniel Nguyen; Raman Dusaj; Leslee J Shaw; Rebecca J Beyth
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Jonathan J Shuster; Rami Doukky; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  The prognostic value of cardiac SPECT performed at the primary care physician's office.

Authors:  Rami Doukky; Nathan Frogge; Gautam Balakrishnan; Kathleen Hayes; Fareed Moses Collado; Maria O Rangel; Richard G Trohman; Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.