Literature DB >> 26300341

Genetic transmission of reading ability.

Suzanne C Swagerman1, Elsje van Bergen2, Conor Dolan3, Eco J C de Geus4, Marinka M G Koenis5, Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol5, Dorret I Boomsma3.   

Abstract

Reading is the processing of written language. Family resemblance for reading (dis)ability might be due to transmission of a genetic liability or due to family environment, including cultural transmission from parents to offspring. Familial-risk studies exploring neurobehavioral precursors for dyslexia and twin studies can only speak to some of these issues, but a combined twin-family study can resolve the nature of the transmitted risk. Word-reading fluency scores of 1100 participants from 431 families (with twins, siblings and their parents) were analyzed to estimate genetic and environmental sources of variance, and to test the presence of assortative mating and cultural transmission. Results show that variation in reading ability is mainly caused by additive and non-additive genetic factors (64%). The substantial assortative mating (rfather-mother=0.38) has scientific and clinical implications. We conclude that parents and offspring tend to resemble each other for genetic reasons, and not due to cultural transmission.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural transmission; Dyslexia; Environment; Genetic transmission; Heritability; Offspring; Parent; Reading; Sibling; Twin

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26300341     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Achievement Outcomes Based on Family History of Learning Disabilities Status.

Authors:  Florina Erbeli; Sara A Hart; Jeanette Taylor
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2018-05-23

2.  Country-by-genotype-by-environment interaction in childhood academic achievement.

Authors:  Eveline L de Zeeuw; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts.

Authors:  Biyao Wang; Jessie R Baldwin; Tabea Schoeler; Rosa Cheesman; Wikus Barkhuizen; Frank Dudbridge; David Bann; Tim T Morris; Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genome-Wide Polygenic Scores Predict Reading Performance Throughout the School Years.

Authors:  Saskia Selzam; Philip S Dale; Richard K Wagner; John C DeFries; Martin Cederlöf; Paul F O'Reilly; Eva Krapohl; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Word Decoding Development during Phonics Instruction in Children at Risk for Dyslexia.

Authors:  Moniek M H Schaars; Eliane Segers; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2017-05

6.  Evolving Concepts of Dyslexia and Their Implications for Research and Remediation.

Authors:  Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 7.  Nurture might be nature: cautionary tales and proposed solutions.

Authors:  Sara A Hart; Callie Little; Elsje van Bergen
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  Links between looking and speaking in autism and first-degree relatives: insights into the expression of genetic liability to autism.

Authors:  Kritika Nayar; Peter C Gordon; Gary E Martin; Abigail L Hogan; Chelsea La Valle; Walker McKinney; Michelle Lee; Elizabeth S Norton; Molly Losh
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 7.509

9.  Development of thalamus mediates paternal age effect on offspring reading: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Zhichao Xia; Cheng Wang; Roeland Hancock; Maaike Vandermosten; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.