Literature DB >> 26298208

An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) Scoring System to Assess the Morbidity Profile of Partial Nephrectomy.

Massimiliano Spaliviero1, Bing Ying Poon2, Christoph A Karlo3, Giuliano B Guglielmetti1, Pier Luigi Di Paolo3, Renato Beluco Corradi1, Alexandre G Martin-Malburet1, Felix Campos-Juanatey4, Eva Escudero-Fontano5, Daniel D Sjoberg2, Paul Russo1, Jonathan A Coleman1, Oguz Akin3, Karim A Touijer6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics affect surgical complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN).
OBJECTIVE: To develop an Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) scoring system to predict morbidity of PN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Four readers independently scored contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of 179 patients who underwent PN. INTERVENTION: Renal cortical masses were categorized by the order of vessels needed to be transected/dissected during PN. Scores of 1, 2, 3S, or 3H were assigned to tumors requiring transection of interlobular and arcuate arteries, interlobar arteries, segmental arteries, or in close proximity of the renal hilum, respectively during PN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Interobserver variability was assessed with kappa values and percentage of exact matches between each pairwise combination of readers. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between reference scores and ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and estimated glomerular filtration rates at 6 wk and 6 mo after surgery adjusted for baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Fisher's exact test was used to test for differences in risk of urinary fistula formation by reference category assignment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Pairwise comparisons of readers' score assignments were significantly correlated (all p<0.0001); average kappa = 0.545 across all reader pairs. The average proportion of exact matches was 69%. Linear regression between the complexity score system and surgical outcomes showed significant associations between reference category assignments and ischemia time (p<0.0001) and estimated blood loss (p=0.049). Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in risk of urinary fistula formation with higher reference category assignments (p=0.028). Limitations include use of a single institutional cohort to evaluate our system.
CONCLUSIONS: The ABC scoring system for PN is intuitive, easy to use, and demonstrated good correlation with perioperative morbidity. PATIENT
SUMMARY: The ABC scoring system is a novel anatomy-reproducible tool developed to help patients and doctors understand the complexity of renal masses and predict the outcomes of kidney surgery.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney neoplasms; Nephrometry; Observer variation; Outcome assessment; Partial nephrectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26298208      PMCID: PMC4826765          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems.

Authors:  Matthew N Simmons; Shahab P Hillyer; Byron H Lee; Amr F Fergany; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  M N Hew; B Baseskioglu; K Barwari; P H Axwijk; C Can; S Horenblas; A Bex; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna Pes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jay Simhan; Marc C Smaldone; Kevin J Tsai; Daniel J Canter; Tianyu Li; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Silvia Secco; Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Raffaele De Caro; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Are urologists and radiologists equally effective in determining the RENAL Nephrometry score?

Authors:  Steeve Benadiba; Anne-Laure Verin; Geraldine Pignot; Thomas Bessede; Julien Drai; Rachid Bahi; Wilson Toussile; Laurence Rocher; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The association between renal tumour scoring systems and ischemia time during open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Darren Desantis; Fadi Kamal; Brian Blew; James Watterson; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system.

Authors:  Surendra B Kolla; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Prediction of complications after partial nephrectomy by RENAL nephrometry score.

Authors:  U D Reddy; R Pillai; R A Parker; J Weston; N A Burgess; E T S Ho; R D Mills; M A Rochester
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scoring: how well correlated are urologist, radiologist, and collaborator scores?

Authors:  M Francesca Monn; Paul T Gellhaus; Timothy A Masterson; Aashish A Patel; Mark Tann; Dylan M Cregar; Ronald S Boris
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score.

Authors:  Ryan P Kopp; Reza Mehrazin; Kerrin L Palazzi; Michael A Liss; Ramzi Jabaji; Hossein S Mirheydar; Hak J Lee; Nishant Patel; Fuad Elkhoury; Anthony L Patterson; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  20 in total

1.  The value of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) imaging in evaluating post-operative renal function outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Guangyu Wu; Ruiyun Zhang; Haiming Mao; Yonghui Chen; Guiqin Liu; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A simplified new-generation renal mass complexity scoring system.

Authors:  Ali Hajiran; Ahmet M Aydin; Salim K Cheriyan; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  [Modern imaging of renal tumors - application in diagnostics and therapy. Characterization, operation planning and therapy monitoring of renal lesions].

Authors:  J P Radtke; D Teber; C D Alt; B A Hadaschik; P Hallscheidt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Tumor complexity and the impact on MIC and trifecta in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-center study of over 500 cases.

Authors:  Burkhard Ubrig; Alexander Roosen; Christian Wagner; Guenter Trabs; Frank Schiefelbein; Jorn H Witt; Georg Schoen; Nina Natascha Harke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Predictive Factors of Renal Function in Partial Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Patients with a Kidney Tumor.

Authors:  Miguel E Jimenez-Romero; Jose C Moreno-Cortes; Elba Y Canelon-Castillo; Sara Diez-Farto; Jose D Santotoribio
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-11-13

6.  Performance Prediction for Surgical Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy Using Nephrometry Scores: A Comparison of Arterial Based Complexity (ABC), RENAL, and PADUA Systems.

Authors:  Ricardo G Alvim; François Audenet; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-30

7.  Diagnostic renal mass biopsy is associated with individual categories of PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores: Analysis of diagnostic and concordance rates with surgical resection.

Authors:  Ricardo B Fonseca; Melissa M Straub Hogan; Meghan E Kapp; Frances Cate; Alice Coogan; Sandeep Arora; Jennifer Gordetsky; Woodson W Smelser; Peter E Clark; Justin Cates; Giovanna A Giannico
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.954

8.  Peritumoral Artery Scoring System: a Novel Scoring System to Predict Renal Function Outcome after Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ruiyun Zhang; Guangyu Wu; Jiwei Huang; Oumin Shi; Wen Kong; Yonghui Chen; Jianrong Xu; Wei Xue; Jin Zhang; Yiran Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Preoperative evaluation of renal artery in patients with renal tumor: Using noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Liangsong Zhu; Guangyu Wu; Jianfeng Wang; Jiwei Huang; Wen Kong; Yonghui Chen; Wei Xue; Yiran Huang; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  External validation of four nephrometry scores for trans-peritoneal robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Amit Patel; Ahmed Abroaf; Narin Suleyman; Shanmugasundaram Gowriemohan; Venkat Prasad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.