| Literature DB >> 26296622 |
Yoshikazu Harada1,2, Hiroto Izumi3, Hirotsugu Noguchi1, Akihiro Kuma4, Yuichiro Kawatsu5, Tomoko Kimura5, Shohei Kitada1,6, Hidetaka Uramoto7, Ke-Yong Wang1,8, Yasuyuki Sasaguri1,9, Hiroshi Hijioka10, Akihiko Miyawaki2, Ryoichi Oya2, Toshiyuki Nakayama1, Kimitoshi Kohno11, Sohsuke Yamada12,13,14.
Abstract
The polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GalNAc-Ts) family of enzymes regulates the critical initial steps of mucin-type O-glycosylation. Among GalNAc-Ts that may significantly influence cancer biology, thus affecting cell differentiation, adhesion, invasion, and/or metastasis, GalNAc-T3 exhibits a high expression in several human cancers, closely associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis. However, the expression pattern of GalNAc-T3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains obscure. Since postoperative recurrence of even early stage OSCC (ESOSCC) occurs at an early phase, significantly affecting their clinical course and worse outcome, the identification of clinically significant accurate biomarkers is needed. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between the immunohistochemical GalNAc-T3 expression and various clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence using 110 paraffin-embedded tumor samples obtained from patients with surgically resected ESOSCC (T1-2N0). Recurrence was recognized in 37 of 110 (33.6 %) patients. The GalNAc-T3 expression was considered to be strongly positive when 20 % or more of the cancer cells showed positive cytoplasmic staining. Consequently, a strong expression of GalNAc-T3 was observed in 40 patients (36.4 %), showing a close relationship to poor differentiation, the presence of lymphatic and vascular invasion, and recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses further demonstrated that the patients with a strong GalNAc-T3+ status had markedly lower disease-free survival (DFS) rates, especially within the first 2 years postoperatively. Therefore, GalNAc-T3 might play a role in the pathogenesis of ESOSCC recurrence, and its immunohistochemical detection potentially predicts a shorter DFS and may be a useful parameter for providing clinical management against ESOSCC in the early postoperative phase.Entities:
Keywords: Disease-free survival (DFS); Early stage OSCC (ESOSCC); Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC); Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GalNAc-T3); Vessel invasion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26296622 PMCID: PMC4841842 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3928-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tumour Biol ISSN: 1010-4283
Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients
| Characteristic | Patients ( |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Average | 64.3 |
| Median | 67 |
| Range | 21–92 |
| >60 | 78 |
| ≦60 | 32 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 61 |
| Female | 49 |
| ECOG PS | |
| ≦1 | 100 |
| ≧2 | 10 |
| Follow-up months | |
| Average | 67.2 |
| Median | 56.6 |
| Range | 1–236 |
| Tumor location | |
| Tongue | 65 |
| Maxilla | 7 |
| Mandible | 9 |
| Buccal | 10 |
| Floor of mouth | 18 |
| Hard palate | 1 |
| Tumor size (cm) | |
| Average | 2 |
| Median | 2 |
| Range | 0.2–3.8 |
| T stage | |
| T1 | 59 |
| T2 | 51 |
| Tumor differentiation | |
| Well | 68 |
| Moderately | 30 |
| Poorly | 12 |
| Mode of invasion | |
| 1 | 16 |
| 2 | 28 |
| 3 | 54 |
| 4C | 9 |
| 4D | 3 |
| Vascular invasion | |
| v(−) | 101 |
| v(+) | 9 |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | |
| ly(−) | 92 |
| ly(+) | 18 |
| Perineural involvement | |
| ne(−) | 107 |
| ne(+) | 3 |
ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, v vascular invasion, ly lymphatic vessel invasion, ne perineural involvement
Outcome of the recurrence status in the patients on the end of this study
| Total ( | % of all | % of recurrent group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No recurrence | 73 | 66.4 | |
| Recurrencea | 37 | 33.6 | |
| Local recurrence | 13 | 11.8 | 35.1 |
| Subsequent regional lymph node metastasis | 29 | 26.4 | 78.4 |
aLocoregional recurrence: n = 5
Fig. 1The specificity of our original polyclonal antibody for GalNAc-T3 was confirmed using Western blotting. a A Western blotting analysis confirmed the specificity of the GalNAc-T3 antibody. HSC-2 cells were transfected with siRNA control and GalNAc-T3 siRNA knockdown (no. 85 and no. 86), and 30-μg protein from whole cell lysates was applied. β-actin was used as an internal control. b COS-1 cells were transfected with GalNAc-T3 expression plasmid, and 30 μg protein from whole cell lysates was applied
Fig. 2The cytoplasmic GalNAc-T3 expression patterns showed specifically positive staining on immunohistochemistry, potentially associated with early recurrence in the ESOSCC patients. Representative images of immunohistochemically strong/weak positivity for GalNAc-T3 in the human ESOSCC samples are shown, demonstrating a cytoplasmic staining pattern in the strong GalNAc-T3-positive cases with postoperative recurrence (case no. 25), compared to the scant cytoplasmic staining pattern in the weak GalNAc-T3-positive cases without any recurrence (case no. 71) (Original magnification: ×100; inset, ×400). In contrast, a cytoplasmic GalNAc-T3 expression was very weakly detectable of adjacent non-carcinomatous squamous epithelium (normal to dysplasia). Each inset provides a representative image of ESOSCC carcinomatous and non-carcinomatous nuclei and cytoplasm on high-power view. H&E hematoxylin and eosin. Bars = 200 μm (×100) and 20 μm (×400)
Detailed correlations between the GalNAc-T3 expression and the clinicopathological variables
| Variables | Total | GaINAc T3 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | Weak+ ( | Strong+ ( |
| ||
| Age | 0.05 | ||||
| >60 | 32 | 29.1 | 25 (78.1) | 7 (219) | |
| ≦60 | 78 | 70.9 | 45 (57.7) | 33 (42.3) | |
| Sex | 0.24 | ||||
| Male | 61 | 55.5 | 42 (68.9) | 19 (31.1) | |
| Female | 49 | 44.5 | 28 (57.1) | 21 (42.9) | |
| ECOG PS | 0.74 | ||||
| 0–1 | 100 | 90.9 | 63 (63.0) | 37 (37.0) | |
| 2–4 | 10 | 9.1 | 7 (70.0) | 3 (30.0) | |
| Smoking | 0.17 | ||||
| (−) | 51 | 46.4 | 36 (70.6) | 15 (29.4) | |
| (+) | 59 | 53.6 | 34 (57.6) | 25 (42.4) | |
| Alcohol | 0.43 | ||||
| (−) | 49 | 44.5 | 29 (59.2) | 20 (40.8) | |
| (+) | 61 | 55.5 | 41 (67.2) | 20 (32.8) | |
| T stage | 0.11 | ||||
| T1 | 59 | 53.6 | 42 (71.2) | 17 (28.8) | |
| T2 | 51 | 46.4 | 28 (54.9) | 23 (45.1) | |
| Tumor location | 0.32 | ||||
| Tongue | 65 | 59.1 | 39 (60.0) | 26 (40.0) | |
| Maxilla | 7 | 6.4 | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | |
| Mandible | 9 | 8.2 | 4 (44.4) | 5 (55.6) | |
| Buccal | 10 | 9.1 | 6 (60.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Floor of mouth | 18 | 16.4 | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | |
| Hard palate | 1 | 0.9 | 1 (100) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Differentiation | 0.03 | ||||
| Well, moderately | 98 | 89.1 | 66 (67.3) | 32 (32.7) | |
| Poorly | 12 | 10.9 | 4 (33.3) | 8 (66.7) | |
| Mode of invasion | 0.40 | ||||
| 1–3 | 95 | 86.4 | 62 (65) | 33 (32.7) | |
| 4C, 4D | 15 | 13.6 | 8 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.04 | ||||
| v(−) | 101 | 91.8 | 62 (65) | 33 (34.7) | |
| v(+) | 9 | 8.2 | 2 (22.2) | 7 (77.8) | |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | 0.03 | ||||
| ly(−) | 92 | 83.6 | 63 (68.5) | 29 (31.5) | |
| ly(+) | 18 | 16.4 | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) | |
| Perineural involvement | 0.55 | ||||
| ne(−) | 107 | 97.3 | 67 (62.6) | 40 (37.4) | |
| ne(+) | 3 | 2.7 | 3 (38.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Recurrence | 0.01 | ||||
| (−) | 73 | 66.4 | 53 (72.6) | 20 (27.4) | |
| (+) | 37 | 33.6 | 17 (46) | 20 (54.1) | |
ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, v vascular invasion, ly lymphatic vessel invasion, ne perineural involvement
Fig. 3GalNAc-T3 staining patterns significantly corresponding to the primary ESOSCC specimens. Representative immunohistochemical GalNAc-T3 sections are presented with a strong expression of early recurrent ESOSCC in both the primary oral mucosa and metastatic regional lymph node (case no. 21). H&E hematoxylin and eosin. Bars = 200 μm (×100) and 20 μm (×400)
Fig. 4A strong GalNAc-T3-positive expression was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative DFS, but not OS, in the ESOSCC patients, especially within the first 2 years postoperatively. a Kaplan–Meier curves for DFS in the patients with ESOSCC within the first 2 (left) and 5 (right) years after surgery according to the GalNAc-T3 expression. b Kaplan–Meier curves for OS in the patients with ESOSCC within the first 2 (left) and 5 (right) years after surgery according to the GalNAc-T3 expression. DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival
Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival (DFS) among the 110 patients with ESOSCC according to the clinicopathological variables and the strong GalNAc-T3 expression
| Variables | No. of patients (%) | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease-free | Disease | HR | 95 % CI |
| HR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Age | ||||||||
| ≦60 | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 100 | |||||
| >60 | 51 (65.4) | 27 (34.6) | 1.26 | 0.61–2.62 | 0.53 | |||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female | 31 (63.3) | 18 (36.7) | 1.00 | |||||
| Male | 42 (68.9) | 19 (31.1) | 0.85 | 0.45–2.30 | 0.25 | |||
| ECOG PS | ||||||||
| 0–1 | 64 (64.0) | 36 (36.0) | 1.00 | |||||
| 2–4 | 9 (90.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0.31 | 0.04–2.30 | 0.25 | |||
| Smoking | ||||||||
| (−) | 34 (66.7) | 17 (33.3) | 1.00 | |||||
| (+) | 39 (66.1) | 20 (33.9) | 1.08 | 0.56–2.06 | 0.82 | |||
| Alcohol | ||||||||
| (−) | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 1.00 | |||||
| (+) | 51 (65.4) | 27 (34.6) | 1.55 | 0.79–3.00 | 0.20 | |||
| T stage | ||||||||
| T1 | 42 (71.2) | 17 (28.8) | 1.00 | |||||
| T2 | 31 (60.8) | 20 (39.2) | 1.53 | 0.80–2.91 | 0.20 | |||
| Tumor location | ||||||||
| Maxilla, mandible, buccal | 23 (65.7) | 12 (34.3) | 1.00 | |||||
| Tongue, floor of mouth | 50 (66.7) | 25 (33.3) | 1.20 | 0.50–2.40 | 0.82 | |||
| Differentiation | ||||||||
| Well, moderately | 68 (69.4) | 30 (30.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Poorly | 5 (41.7) | 7 (58.3) | 2.53 | 1.11–5.79 | 0.03 | 0.69 | 0.19–2.54 | 0.58 |
| Mode of invasion | ||||||||
| 1, 2, 3 | 68 (71.6) | 27 (28.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 4C, D | 5 (33.3) | 10 (66.7) | 3.29 | 1.59–6.82 | 0.001 | 3.23 | 1.02–10.6 | 0.05 |
| Vascular invasion | ||||||||
| v(−) | 70 (69.3) | 31 (30.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| v(+) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (66.7) | 3.54 | 1.47–8.52 | 0.01 | 2.25 | 0.87–5.78 | 0.09 |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | ||||||||
| ly(−) | 68 (73.9) | 24 (26.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| ly(+) | 5(27.8) | 13 (72.2) | 3.96 | 1.98–7.91 | <0.001 | 2.18 | 1.01–4.71 | 0.05 |
| Perineural involvement | ||||||||
| ne(−) | 71 (66.4) | 36 (33.6) | 1.00 | |||||
| ne(+) | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.87 | 0.12–6.34 | 0.89 | |||
| GalNAc-T3 expression | ||||||||
| Weak+ | 53 (75.7) | 17 (24.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Strong+ | 20 (50.0) | 20 (50.0) | 2.81 | 1.47–5.37 | 0.002 | 2.23 | 1.06–4.80 | 0.03 |
v vascular invasion, ly lymphatic vessel invasion, ne perineural involvement