Pelin Balcik-Ercin1, Metin Cetin1, Irem Yalim-Camci1, Gorkem Odabas1, Nurettin Tokay1, A Emre Sayan2, Tamer Yagci3. 1. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Gebze Technical University, C2-Building, 41400, Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Somers Building, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. 3. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Gebze Technical University, C2-Building, 41400, Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey. tyagci@gtu.edu.tr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ZEB2 is a transcriptional repressor that regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through binding to bipartite E-box motifs in gene regulatory regions. Despite the abundant presence of E-boxes within the human genome and the multiplicity of pathophysiological processes regulated during ZEB2-induced EMT, only a small fraction of ZEB2 targets has been identified so far. Hence, we explored genome-wide ZEB2 binding by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) under endogenous ZEB2 expression conditions. METHODS: For ChIP-Seq we used an anti-ZEB2 monoclonal antibody, clone 6E5, in SNU398 hepatocellular carcinoma cells exhibiting a high endogenous ZEB2 expression. The ChIP-Seq targets were validated using ChIP-qPCR, whereas ZEB2-dependent expression of target genes was assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting in shRNA-mediated ZEB2 silenced SNU398 cells and doxycycline-induced ZEB2 overexpressing colorectal carcinoma DLD1 cells. Changes in target gene expression were also assessed using primary human tumor cDNA arrays in conjunction with RT-qPCR. Additional differential expression and correlation analyses were performed using expO and Human Protein Atlas datasets. RESULTS: Over 500 ChIP-Seq positive genes were annotated, and intervals related to these genes were found to include the ZEB2 binding motif CACCTG according to TOMTOM motif analysis in the MEME Suite database. Assessment of ZEB2-dependent expression of target genes in ZEB2-silenced SNU398 cells and ZEB2-induced DLD1 cells revealed that the GALNT3 gene serves as a ZEB2 target with the highest, but inversely correlated, expression level. Remarkably, GALNT3 also exhibited the highest enrichment in the ChIP-qPCR validation assays. Through the analyses of primary tumor cDNA arrays and expO datasets a significant differential expression and a significant inverse correlation between ZEB2 and GALNT3 expression were detected in most of the tumors. We also explored ZEB2 and GALNT3 protein expression using the Human Protein Atlas dataset and, again, observed an inverse correlation in all analyzed tumor types, except malignant melanoma. In contrast to a generally negative or weak ZEB2 expression, we found that most tumor tissues exhibited a strong or moderate GALNT3 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation that ZEB2 negatively regulates a GalNAc-transferase (GALNT3) that is involved in O-glycosylation adds another layer of complexity to the role of ZEB2 in cancer progression and metastasis. Proteins glycosylated by GALNT3 may be exploited as novel diagnostics and/or therapeutic targets.
BACKGROUND:ZEB2 is a transcriptional repressor that regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through binding to bipartite E-box motifs in gene regulatory regions. Despite the abundant presence of E-boxes within the human genome and the multiplicity of pathophysiological processes regulated during ZEB2-induced EMT, only a small fraction of ZEB2 targets has been identified so far. Hence, we explored genome-wide ZEB2 binding by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) under endogenous ZEB2 expression conditions. METHODS: For ChIP-Seq we used an anti-ZEB2 monoclonal antibody, clone 6E5, in SNU398 hepatocellular carcinoma cells exhibiting a high endogenous ZEB2 expression. The ChIP-Seq targets were validated using ChIP-qPCR, whereas ZEB2-dependent expression of target genes was assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting in shRNA-mediated ZEB2 silenced SNU398 cells and doxycycline-induced ZEB2 overexpressing colorectal carcinoma DLD1 cells. Changes in target gene expression were also assessed using primary humantumor cDNA arrays in conjunction with RT-qPCR. Additional differential expression and correlation analyses were performed using expO and Human Protein Atlas datasets. RESULTS: Over 500 ChIP-Seq positive genes were annotated, and intervals related to these genes were found to include the ZEB2 binding motif CACCTG according to TOMTOM motif analysis in the MEME Suite database. Assessment of ZEB2-dependent expression of target genes in ZEB2-silenced SNU398 cells and ZEB2-induced DLD1 cells revealed that the GALNT3 gene serves as a ZEB2 target with the highest, but inversely correlated, expression level. Remarkably, GALNT3 also exhibited the highest enrichment in the ChIP-qPCR validation assays. Through the analyses of primary tumor cDNA arrays and expO datasets a significant differential expression and a significant inverse correlation between ZEB2 and GALNT3 expression were detected in most of the tumors. We also explored ZEB2 and GALNT3 protein expression using the Human Protein Atlas dataset and, again, observed an inverse correlation in all analyzed tumor types, except malignant melanoma. In contrast to a generally negative or weak ZEB2 expression, we found that most tumor tissues exhibited a strong or moderate GALNT3 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation that ZEB2 negatively regulates a GalNAc-transferase (GALNT3) that is involved in O-glycosylation adds another layer of complexity to the role of ZEB2 in cancer progression and metastasis. Proteins glycosylated by GALNT3 may be exploited as novel diagnostics and/or therapeutic targets.
Authors: K Verschueren; J E Remacle; C Collart; H Kraft; B S Baker; P Tylzanowski; L Nelles; G Wuytens; M T Su; R Bodmer; J C Smith; D Huylebroeck Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-07-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Cindy Vandewalle; Joke Comijn; Bram De Craene; Petra Vermassen; Erik Bruyneel; Henriette Andersen; Eugene Tulchinsky; Frans Van Roy; Geert Berx Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-11-24 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: S Kitada; S Yamada; A Kuma; S Ouchi; T Tasaki; A Nabeshima; H Noguchi; K-Y Wang; S Shimajiri; R Nakano; H Izumi; K Kohno; T Matsumoto; Y Sasaguri Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Earnest James Paul Daniel; Matilde Las Rivas; Erandi Lira-Navarrete; Ana García-García; Ramon Hurtado-Guerrero; Henrik Clausen; Thomas A Gerken Journal: Glycobiology Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 4.313
Authors: Bas M Smits; Taila Hartley; Ester Dünnebach; Marije Bartels; Kim M Boycott; Kirstin D Kernohan; David A Dyment; Jacques C Giltay; Elie Haddad; Olga Jarinova; Joris van Montfrans; Annet van Royen-Kerkhof; Lars T van der Veken; Moniek de Witte; Stefan Nierkens; Anne Pham-Huy; Helen L Leavis Journal: Hemasphere Date: 2022-09-21
Authors: Cheryl Y Brown; Sonia Dayan; Soon Wei Wong; Adrian Kaczmarek; Christopher M Hope; Stephen M Pederson; Victoria Arnet; Gregory J Goodall; Darryl Russell; Timothy J Sadlon; Simon C Barry Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-06-12