Literature DB >> 26294338

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients.

May C Tee1, Kristopher P Croome1, Christopher R Shubert1, Michael B Farnell1, Mark J Truty1, Florencia G Que1, K Marie Reid-Lombardo1, Rory L Smoot1, David M Nagorney1, Michael L Kendrick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) are at increased risk for surgical morbidity and mortality. Whether totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) mitigates these risks has not been evaluated.
METHODS: A retrospective review of outcomes in patients submitted to pancreatoduodenectomy during 2007-2014 was conducted (n = 860). Outcomes in elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) were compared with those in non-elderly patients with respect to risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity and mortality. Differences in outcomes between patients submitted to OPD and TLPD, respectively, were evaluated in the elderly subgroup.
RESULTS: In elderly patients, the incidences of cardiac events (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, P < 0.001), respiratory events (OR 1.68, P = 0.04), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 1.73, P = 0.003), increased length of stay (LoS, 1 additional day) (P < 0.001), discharge disposition other than home (OR 8.14, P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (OR 1.48, P = 0.05) were greater than in non-elderly patients. Morbidity and mortality did not differ between the OPD and TLPD subgroups of elderly patients. In elderly patients, OPD was associated with increased DGE (OR 1.80, P = 0.03), LoS (1 additional day; P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (OR 2.89, P < 0.001) compared with TLPD.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients undergoing TLPD experience rates of mortality, morbidity and cardiorespiratory events similar to those in patients submitted to OPD. In elderly patients, TLPD offers benefits by decreasing DGE, LoS and blood transfusion requirements.
© 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26294338      PMCID: PMC4571759          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  25 in total

1.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Islet Carcinoma : A Five-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  A O Whipple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1945-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pietro Addeo; Francesco M Bianco; Antonio Gangemi; Subhashini M Ayloo; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches.

Authors:  Kris P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Using a modification of the Clavien-Dindo system accounting for readmissions and multiple interventions: defining quality for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marshall S Baker; Karen L Sherman; Susan J Stocker; Amanda V Hayman; David J Bentrem; Richard A Prinz; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; John A Stauffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Pancreatic resection in the octogenarian: a safe option for pancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  Ioannis Hatzaras; Carl Schmidt; Dori Klemanski; Peter Muscarella; W Scott Melvin; E Christopher Ellison; Mark Bloomston
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Attila Nakeeb
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2009

10.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan; Ren-Chao Zhang; Miao-Zun Zhang; Jia-Yu Zhou; Xian-Fa Wang; Hendi Maher; Qi-Long Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Sam C Wang; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Michael A Choti; Mathew M Augustine; Patricio M Polanco; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Michael A Choti; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Sam C Wang; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Renyi Qin; Michael L Kendrick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Rowan W Parks; Yinmo Yang; Jin He; Taiping Zhang; Yiping Mou; Xianjun Yu; Bing Peng; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ho-Seong Han; Jae Hoon Lee; Michiaki Unno; Steven W M Olde Damink; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Pierce Chow; Tan To Cheung; Nim Choi; Yu-Wen Tien; Chengfeng Wang; Manson Fok; Xiujun Cai; Shengquan Zou; Shuyou Peng; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Total laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in an 89-year-old man: A case report and review of a single institute's experience in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: minimizing the learning curve.

Authors:  Levan Tsamalaidze; John A Stauffer
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 7.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhanwei Zhao; Zifang Yin; Zhenning Hang; Gang Ji; Quanxin Feng; Qingchuan Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: Case series.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yunqiang Cai; Wei Zhao; Pan Gao; Yongbin Li; Xubao Liu; Bing Peng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique - A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases.

Authors:  Steffen Deichmann; Louisa Romina Bolm; Kim Christin Honselmann; Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Tobias Keck; Dirk Bausch
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.