Literature DB >> 24861871

Using a modification of the Clavien-Dindo system accounting for readmissions and multiple interventions: defining quality for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Marshall S Baker1, Karen L Sherman, Susan J Stocker, Amanda V Hayman, David J Bentrem, Richard A Prinz, Mark S Talamonti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Clavien-Dindo system (CD) does not change the grade assigned a complication when multiple readmissions or interventions are required to manage a complication. We apply a modification of CD accounting for readmissions and interventions to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: PDs done between 1999 and 2009 were reviewed. CD grade IIIa complications requiring more than one intervention and II and IIIa complications requiring significantly prolonged lengths of stay including all 90-day readmissions were classified severe-adverse-postoperative-outcomes (SAPO). CD IIIb, IV, and V complications were also classified SAPOs. All other complications were considered minor-adverse-postoperative-outcomes (MAPO).
RESULTS: Four-hundred forty three of 490 PD patients (90.4%) had either no complication or a complication of low to moderate CD grade (I, II, IIIa). When reclassified by the new metric, 92 patient-outcomes (19%) were upgraded from CD II or IIIa to SAPO. One-hundred thirty nine patients (28.4%) had a SAPO. Multivariable regression identified age >75 years, pylorus preservation and operative blood loss >1,500 ml as predictors of SAPO. Age was not associated with poor outcome using the unmodified CD system.
CONCLUSIONS: Established systems may under-grade the severity of some complications following PD. We define a procedure-specific modification of CD accounting for readmissions and multiple interventions. Using this modification, advanced age, pylorus preservation, and significant blood loss are associated with poor outcome.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pancreaticoduodenectomy; quality; surgical complications

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24861871     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients.

Authors:  May C Tee; Kristopher P Croome; Christopher R Shubert; Michael B Farnell; Mark J Truty; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Rory L Smoot; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Preoperative Chemoradiation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Does Not Increase 90-Day Postoperative Morbidity or Mortality.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Morgan L Bruno; Jordan M Cloyd; Laura Prakash; Jeffrey E Lee; Michael Kim; Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay; Sunil Krishnan; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Gauri Varadhachary; Rachna Shroff; Robert Wolff; Milind Javle; Michael J Overman; David Fogelman; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Clinical Efficacy of the Preservation of the Hepatic Branch of the Vagus Nerve on Delayed Gastric Emptying After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xu Li; Tingting Qin; Feng Zhu; Min Wang; Chao Dang; Li He; Shutao Pan; Yuhui Liu; Taoyuan Yin; Yecheng Feng; Xin Wang; Yahong Yu; Ming Shen; Xingpei Lu; Yongjun Chen; Li Jiang; Chenjian Shi; Renyi Qin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A Graded Evaluation of Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Mark S Talamonti; Susan J Stocker; Chi-Hsiung Wang; David J Winchester; David J Bentrem; Richard A Prinz; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A National Assessment of Optimal Oncologic Surgery for Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Katherine Hrebinko; Samer Tohme; Richard S Hoehn; Samer AlMasri; Sidrah Khan; Christof Kaltenmeier; Kenneth K Lee; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer Zureikat; Ibrahim Nassour
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Predictive factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jikuan Jin; Guangbing Xiong; Jiali Li; Xingjun Guo; Min Wang; Zhen Li; Feng Zhu; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

7.  A reinforced suture method for stapled gastrointestinal anastomosis to reduce gastrointestinal hemorrhage during Whipple operation in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Ning Jiang; Liujun Jiang; Rui Liao; Lei Xiang; Baoyong Zhou; Dewei Li
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Clinical importance of preoperative red-cell volume distribution width as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chao Dang; Min Wang; Tingting Qin; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Laparoscopic pancreaticodoudenectomy: An excellent approach in elderly patients, a multicenter, comparative study.

Authors:  Maher Hendi; Yiping Mou; Chao Lu; Yu Pan; Bin Zhang; Ke Chen; Xiaowu Xu; Renchao Zhang; Yucheng Zhou; Weiwei Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.