Literature DB >> 26293841

Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.

Alp Akonur, Catherine A Firanek, Mary E Gellens, Audrey M Hutchcraft, Pranay Kathuria1, James A Sloand.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ♦
BACKGROUND: The use of automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (APD and CAPD) prescriptions (Rxs) to achieve adequate uremic toxin and fluid removal targets is important for attaining optimal patient outcomes. One approach for predicting such Rxs is the use of kinetic modeling. ♦
METHODS: Demographic data and peritoneal membrane characteristics derived from a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) were available from 1,005 patients in North American centers who participated in a national adequacy initiative in 1999. Twelve patient subgroups were identified according to peritoneal membrane transport type and tertiles of total body water, assumed equal to urea distribution volume (Vurea). Each patient was then modeled using PD Adequest 2.0 to be treated by 12 CAPD and 34 APD Rxs using both glucose and icodextrin solutions to achieve adequacy targets of weekly urea Kt/V of 1.7 and 1 L of daily ultrafiltration (UF). Residual kidney function (RKF) was assumed to be 0, 2, 4, and 6 mL/min. Feasible peritoneal dialysis (PD) Rxs were identified where: 1) the 95% confidence limit achieved the goal of meeting the targets for urea Kt/V, daily UF, and both in 85%, 75%, and 70% of patients, respectively; 2) average PD solution dextrose concentration was < 2.5%; and 3) the number of daytime exchanges was minimized. ♦
RESULTS: Feasible PD Rxs were similar when RKF was ≥ 2 mL/min, allowing condensed recommendations based on RKF ≥ 2 mL/min or < 2 mL/min. Individuals with lower or slower membrane transport required relatively greater 24-h solution volumes to achieve adequacy targets when RKF fell below 2 mL/min. With increasing Vurea, there was disproportionately greater dependence on RKF to achieve targets. While multiple Rxs achieving urea Kt/V and daily UF goals were identified for all membrane transport types, use of icodextrin in the long dwell reduced the need for a midday exchange in APD, glucose exposure, required fill and 24-h dwell volumes, irrespective of RKF and Vurea. While these benefits were most notable in high and high-average transporters, similar results were also seen in low and low-average transporters. ♦
CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic modeling identified multiple APD and CAPD Rxs that achieved adequate uremic solute and fluid removal for patients, irrespective of RKF and Vurea. Use of icodextrin rather than glucose in the long dwell reduced the complexity of the PD regimen, total glucose exposure, and 24-h total treatment solution volumes. Irrespective of modeling, adequacy of any PD prescription should be based upon individual clinical evaluation both for volume and solute removal.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glucose; icodextrin; kinetic modeling; peritoneal dialysis; prescription; total body water; ultrafiltration; urea Kt/V

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26293841      PMCID: PMC4803365          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  44 in total

1.  Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  K Ateş; G Nergizoğlu; K Keven; A Sen; S Kutlay; S Ertürk; N Duman; O Karatan; A E Ertuğ
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Improving clinical outcomes among hemodialysis patients: a proposal for a "volume first" approach from the chief medical officers of US dialysis providers.

Authors:  Daniel E Weiner; Steven M Brunelli; Abigail Hunt; Brigitte Schiller; Richard Glassock; Frank W Maddux; Douglas Johnson; Tom Parker; Allen Nissenson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  A decline in residual glomerular filtration during the use of icodextrin may be due to underhydration.

Authors:  Constantin J Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Ulrich Gladziwa; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M Leunissen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Relationship between drain volume/fill volume ratio and clinical outcomes associated with overfill complaints in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ira D Davis; Borut Cizman; Kelly Mundt; Lieling Wu; Robert Childers; Rod Mell; Sarah Prichard
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Two-in-one protocol: simultaneous small-pore and ultrasmall-pore peritoneal transport quantification.

Authors:  Ana Paula Bernardo; M Auxiliadora Bajo; Olivia Santos; Gloria del Peso; Maria João Carvalho; António Cabrita; Rafael Selgas; Anabela Rodrigues
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  A multinational clinical validation study of PD ADEQUEST 2.0. PD ADEQUEST International Study Group.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; K O Story; W T O'Neill
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  The occurrence of increased intraperitoneal volume events in automated peritoneal dialysis in the US: role of programming, patient/user actions and ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Borut Cižman; Steve Lindo; Brian Bilionis; Ira Davis; Aaron Brown; Jennifer Miller; Gerald Phillips; Alex Kriukov; James A Sloand
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study.

Authors:  Edwina A Brown; Simon J Davies; Peter Rutherford; Frederique Meeus; Mercedes Borras; Werner Riegel; Jose C Divino Filho; Edward Vonesh; Monique van Bree
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Fluid status, blood pressure, and cardiovascular abnormalities in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Constantijn J A M Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Marc Schonck; Ruben Dammers; Emiel Cheriex; Andrea P Palmans Meulemans; Arnold P G Hoeks; Bernardus van Kreel; Ulrich Gladziwa; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M L Leunissen
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

1.  Economic costs of automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Taiwan: a combined survey and retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Hsiun Tang; Yu-Ting Wu; Siao-Yuan Huang; Hsi-Hsien Chen; Ming-Ju Wu; Bang-Gee Hsu; Jer-Chia Tsai; Tso-Hsiao Chen; Yuh-Mou Sue
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all.

Authors:  Athanasios Roumeliotis; Stefanos Roumeliotis; Konstantinos Leivaditis; Marios Salmas; Theodoros Eleftheriadis; Vassilios Liakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.370

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.