Literature DB >> 24991052

The occurrence of increased intraperitoneal volume events in automated peritoneal dialysis in the US: role of programming, patient/user actions and ultrafiltration.

Borut Cižman1, Steve Lindo1, Brian Bilionis1, Ira Davis1, Aaron Brown1, Jennifer Miller1, Gerald Phillips1, Alex Kriukov1, James A Sloand1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Increased intraperitoneal volume (IIPV) can occur during automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). The contribution of factors such as cycler programming and patient/user actions to IIPV has not been previously explored. The relationship between IIPV and cycler programming, patient/user actions, and ultrafiltration over a two-year period was investigated using US data from Baxter cyclers. Drain/fill volume ratios of > 1.6 to ≤ 2.0 and > 2.0 were defined as Level I and Level II IIPV events, respectively.
RESULTS: Level I IIPV events occurred in 2.39% of standard and 4.73% of small fill volume therapies, while Level II IIPV events occurred in 0.26% and 1.33% of therapies, respectively. IIPV events occurred significantly more often in association with tidal peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared to non-tidal PD therapies. In tidal therapies, IIPV events were primarily related to suboptimal programming of total ultrafiltration volume. Factors that increased the odds of IIPV events during standard therapies included programming the initial drain volume target to < 70% of the last fill, and setting minimum drain volumes to < 85% of the fill volume. Bypass of initial drain by patients/users was also associated with a significant increase in the odds of IIPV events in non-tidal, but not tidal PD. An increase in the odds for IIPV was also seen for standard therapies within the highest (> 1,245 mL) versus the lowest (< 427 mL) quartile of ultrafiltration. Similar trends were seen in small fill volume therapies. Clinical presentations associated with IIPV events were not assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: IIPV events are more frequent in tidal and small fill volume therapies. The greatest potential for IIPV occurred when the total ultrafiltration was set too low for the patient's UF requirements during tidal therapy. Patient/user bypass of drains without reaching the target drain volume contributes significantly to IIPV events in non-tidal PD therapies. Poorly functioning PD catheters may be central to the cycler programming and patient/user actions that lead to IIPV.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated peritoneal dialysis; increased intraperitoneal volume; tidal peritoneal dialysis; ultrafiltration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24991052      PMCID: PMC4079490          DOI: 10.1177/089686081403400401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of drainage times and alarms with various automated peritoneal dialysis modalities.

Authors:  L Neri; G Viglino; A Cappelletti; C Gandolfo
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2001

2.  Pulmonary function variation in ventilator dependent critically ill infants on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  T E Bunchman; M K Meldrum; J E Meliones; A B Sedman; M B Walters; D B Kershaw
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Profiling of peritoneal ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Salim Mujais; Edward Vonesh
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.545

4.  Dialysis at a crossroads--Part II: A call for action.

Authors:  Thomas F Parker; Barry M Straube; Allen Nissenson; Raymond M Hakim; Theodore I Steinman; Richard J Glassock
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Relationship between fill volume, intraperitoneal pressure, body size, and subjective discomfort perception in CAPD patients. Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  M de Jesús Ventura; D Amato; R Correa-Rotter; R Paniagua
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Peritoneal transport characteristics with glucose polymer based dialysate.

Authors:  M M Ho-dac-Pannekeet; N Schouten; M J Langendijk; J K Hiralall; D R de Waart; D G Struijk; R T Krediet
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  APD: clinical measurement of the maximal acceptable intraperitoneal volume.

Authors:  P Y Durand; J Chanliau; J Gamberoni; D Hestin; M Kessler
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1994

8.  High volume, low frequency continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Z J Twardowski; B F Prowant; K D Nolph; A J Martinez; L M Lampton
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Acute hydrothorax in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis--a collaborative study of 161 centers.

Authors:  Y Nomoto; T Suga; K Nakajima; H Sakai; G Osawa; K Ota; Y Kawaguchi; T Sakai; S Sakai; M Shibata
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Treatment data during pediatric home peritoneal teledialysis.

Authors:  Alberto Edefonti; Salvatore Boccola; Marina Picca; Fabio Paglialonga; Gianluigi Ardissino; Giuseppina Marra; Luciana Ghio; Maria Teresa Parisotto
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Catherine A Firanek; Mary E Gellens; Audrey M Hutchcraft; Pranay Kathuria; James A Sloand
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Drain pain, overfill, and how they are connected.

Authors:  Peter Blake
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.756

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.