Literature DB >> 22383631

Two-in-one protocol: simultaneous small-pore and ultrasmall-pore peritoneal transport quantification.

Ana Paula Bernardo1, M Auxiliadora Bajo, Olivia Santos, Gloria del Peso, Maria João Carvalho, António Cabrita, Rafael Selgas, Anabela Rodrigues.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced free water transport (FWT) through ultrasmall pores contributes to net ultrafiltration failure (UFF) and should be seen as a sign of more severe functional deterioration of the peritoneal membrane. The modified peritoneal equilibration test (PET), measuring the dip in dialysate Na concentration, estimates only FWT. Our aim was to simultaneously quantify small-solute transport, FWT, and small-pore ultrafiltration (SPUF) during a single PET procedure.
METHODS: We performed a 4-hour, 3.86% glucose PET, with additional measurement of ultrafiltration (UF) at 60 minutes, in 70 peritoneal dialysis patients (mean age: 50 ± 16 years; 61% women; PD vintage: 26 ± 23 months). We calculated the dialysate-to-plasma ratios (D/P) of creatinine and Na at 0 and 60 minutes, and the Na dip (Dip(D/PNa60')), the delta dialysate Na 0-60 (ΔDNa(0-60)), FWT, and SPUF.
RESULTS: Sodium sieving (as measured by ΔDNa(0-60)) correlated strongly with the corrected Dip(D/PNa60') (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001) and the corrected FWT (r = 0.41, p = 0.005). Total UF showed better correlation with FWT than with indirect measurements of Na sieving (r = 0.46, p < 0.0001 for FWT; r = 0.360, p < 0.0001 for Dip(D/PNa60')). Corrected FWT fraction was 0.45 ± 0.16. A negative correlation was found between time on PD and both total UF and FWT (r = -0.253, p = 0.035 and r = -0.272, p = 0.023 respectively). The 11 patients (15.7%) diagnosed with UFF had lower FWT (89 mL vs 164 mL, p < 0.05) and higher D/P creatinine (0.75 vs 0.70, p < 0.05) than did the group with normal UF. The SPUF correlated positively with FWT in the normal UF group, but negatively in UFF patients (r = -0.709, p = 0.015). Among UFF patients on PD for a longer period, 44.4% had a FWT percentage below 45%.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of FWT and SPUF is feasible by simultaneous quantification during a modified 3.86% glucose PET, and FWT is a decisive parameter for detecting causes of UFF in addition to increased effective capillary surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22383631      PMCID: PMC3524870          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  27 in total

1.  Aquaporins are unlikely to be affected in marked ultrafiltration failure: results from a computer simulation.

Authors:  B Rippe; J de Arteaga; D Venturoli
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  The effective lymphatic absorption rate is an accurate and useful concept in the physiology of peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Peritoneal transport in CAPD patients with permanent loss of ultrafiltration capacity.

Authors:  O Heimbürger; J Waniewski; A Werynski; A Tranaeus; B Lindholm
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Evaluation of peritoneal membrane characteristics: clinical advice for prescription management by the ERBP working group.

Authors:  Wim van Biesen; Olof Heimburger; Raymond Krediet; Bengt Rippe; Vincenzo La Milia; Adrian Covic; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Correction of sodium sieving for diffusion from the circulation.

Authors:  M M Zweers; A L Imholz; D G Struijk; R T Krediet
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1999

6.  Mass transfer coefficient: comparison between methods.

Authors:  J Teixidó; F Cofan; M Borrás; J Bonet; J Bonal; R Galimany; C Biosca; A Caralps
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Ultrafiltration failure in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  R T Krediet; A L Imholz; D G Struijk; G C Koomen; L Arisz
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Risk factors responsible for ultrafiltration failure in early stages of peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  R Selgas; M A Bajo; M J Castro; G del Peso; A Aguilera; A Fernández-Perpén; A Cirugeda; J A Sánchez-Tomero
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Watske Smit; Dirk G Struijk; Marja M Ho-Dac-Pannekeet; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Diffusion correction of sodium sieving applicable in a peritoneal equilibration test.

Authors:  Wytske M Westra; Watske Smit; Machteld M Zweers; Dirk G Struijk; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2003
View more
  8 in total

1.  Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Catherine A Firanek; Mary E Gellens; Audrey M Hutchcraft; Pranay Kathuria; James A Sloand
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Can Free Water Transport Be Used as a Clinical Parameter for Peritoneal Fibrosis in Long-Term PD Patients?

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet; Deirisa Lopes Barreto; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  The mini-PET in pediatric peritoneal dialysis: a useful tool to predict volume overload?

Authors:  Francisco Cano; Angelica Rojo; Marta Azocar; Maria Jose Ibacache; Angela Delucchi; Francisca Ugarte; Carlos Irarrazabal; Iris Delgado
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Analysis of Ultrafiltration Failure Diagnosed at the Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis with the Help of Peritoneal Equilibration Tests with Complete Drainage at Sixty Minutes. A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Daniela Machado Lopes; Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Teresa García Falcón; Andrés López Muñiz; Tamara Ferreiro Hermida; Antía López Iglesias; Miguel Pérez Fontán
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Associations with Body Composition, Peritoneal Transport, and Peritoneal Glucose Absorption.

Authors:  Ana Paula Bernardo; Jose C Oliveira; Olivia Santos; Maria J Carvalho; Antonio Cabrita; Anabela Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Peritoneal dialysis: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2013-10-14

7.  Hepatocyte growth factor signalizes peritoneal membrane failure in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ana Paula Bernardo; José C Oliveira; Olívia Santos; Maria J Carvalho; António Cabrita; Anabela Rodrigues
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  AQP1-Containing Exosomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Effluent As Biomarker of Dialysis Efficiency.

Authors:  Simone Corciulo; Maria Celeste Nicoletti; Lisa Mastrofrancesco; Serena Milano; Maria Mastrodonato; Monica Carmosino; Andrea Gerbino; Roberto Corciulo; Roberto Russo; Maria Svelto; Loreto Gesualdo; Giuseppe Procino
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.