Literature DB >> 26290231

Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.

Simone Vossel1, Christoph Mathys2, Klaas E Stephan3, Karl J Friston4.   

Abstract

The deployment of visuospatial attention and the programming of saccades are governed by the inferred likelihood of events. In the present study, we combined computational modeling of psychophysical data with fMRI to characterize the computational and neural mechanisms underlying this flexible attentional control. Sixteen healthy human subjects performed a modified version of Posner's location-cueing paradigm in which the percentage of cue validity varied in time and the targets required saccadic responses. Trialwise estimates of the certainty (precision) of the prediction that the target would appear at the cued location were derived from a hierarchical Bayesian model fitted to individual trialwise saccadic response speeds. Trial-specific model parameters then entered analyses of fMRI data as parametric regressors. Moreover, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was performed to identify the most likely functional architecture of the attentional reorienting network and its modulation by (Bayes-optimal) precision-dependent attention. While the frontal eye fields (FEFs), intraparietal sulcus, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of both hemispheres showed higher activity on invalid relative to valid trials, reorienting responses in right FEF, TPJ, and the putamen were significantly modulated by precision-dependent attention. Our DCM results suggested that the precision of predictability underlies the attentional modulation of the coupling of TPJ with FEF and the putamen. Our results shed new light on the computational architecture and neuronal network dynamics underlying the context-sensitive deployment of visuospatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Spatial attention and its neural correlates in the human brain have been studied extensively with the help of fMRI and cueing paradigms in which the location of targets is pre-cued on a trial-by-trial basis. One aspect that has so far been neglected concerns the question of how the brain forms attentional expectancies when no a priori probability information is available but needs to be inferred from observations. This study elucidates the computational and neural mechanisms under which probabilistic inference governs attentional deployment. Our results show that Bayesian belief updating explains changes in cortical connectivity; in that directional influences from the temporoparietal junction on the frontal eye fields and the putamen were modulated by (Bayes-optimal) updates.
Copyright © 2015 Vossel et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; attentional networks; fMRI; saccades; spatial cueing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290231      PMCID: PMC4540794          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1382-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

Authors:  A C Nobre; D R Gitelman; E C Dias; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The respiration response function: the temporal dynamics of fMRI signal fluctuations related to changes in respiration.

Authors:  Rasmus M Birn; Monica A Smith; Tyler B Jones; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Striatal prediction error modulates cortical coupling.

Authors:  Hanneke E M den Ouden; Jean Daunizeau; Jonathan Roiser; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account.

Authors:  Mimi Liljeholm; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Neural correlates of refixation saccades and antisaccades in normal and schizophrenia subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer E McDowell; Gregory G Brown; Martin Paulus; Antigona Martinez; Sara E Stewart; David J Dubowitz; David L Braff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Comparing families of dynamic causal models.

Authors:  Will D Penny; Klaas E Stephan; Jean Daunizeau; Maria J Rosa; Karl J Friston; Thomas M Schofield; Alex P Leff
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.

Authors:  Jean Daunizeau; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Matthias Pessiglione; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Felix Blankenburg; Otto Bjoertomt; Sven Bestmann; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  30 in total

1.  Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Florent Meyniel; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Functional Fractionation of the Cingulo-opercular Network: Alerting Insula and Updating Cingulate.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; Hana P Eaton; René Marois
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Specific Visual Subregions of TPJ Mediate Reorienting of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Disruption of the Right Temporoparietal Junction Impairs Probabilistic Belief Updating.

Authors:  Paola Mengotti; Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Reaction Time "Mismatch Costs" Change with the Likelihood of Stimulus-Response Compatibility.

Authors:  Megan E J Campbell; Chase S Sherwell; Ross Cunnington; Scott Brown; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-08-25

7.  Combining optogenetic stimulation and fMRI to validate a multivariate dynamical systems model for estimating causal brain interactions.

Authors:  Srikanth Ryali; Yen-Yu Ian Shih; Tianwen Chen; John Kochalka; Daniel Albaugh; Zhongnan Fang; Kaustubh Supekar; Jin Hyung Lee; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Visual Mismatch and Predictive Coding: A Computational Single-Trial ERP Study.

Authors:  Gabor Stefanics; Jakob Heinzle; András Attila Horváth; Klaas Enno Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Comparative Analysis of Behavioral Models for Adaptive Learning in Changing Environments.

Authors:  Dimitrije Marković; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Helene Haker; Maya Schneebeli; Klaas Enno Stephan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.