Literature DB >> 26289350

Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Dianne Stroman1, Urs P Kreuter2.   

Abstract

Using mail survey data and telephone interviews, we report on landowner satisfaction with permanent easements held by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) throughout Texas. This study found that landowners were dissatisfied with the NRCS Wetland Reserve Program (WRP), conflicting with results of previous studies. The objective of this study was to explore specific reasons for frustration expressed by landowners with the program. We found three predominant themes underpinning program dissatisfaction: (1) upfront restoration failures, (2) overly restrictive easement constraints, and (3) bureaucratic hurdles limiting landowners' ability to conduct adaptive management on their easement property. The implications of this study suggest that attitudes of landowners participating in the WRP may limit the long-term effectiveness of this program. Suggestions for improving the program include implementing timely, ecologically sound restoration procedures and streamlining and simplifying the approval process for management activity requests. In addition, the NRCS should consider revising WRP restriction guidelines in order to provide more balance between protection goals and landowner autonomy.

Keywords:  Conservation easements; Private land management; Wetland Reserve Program; Wetlands

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26289350     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0596-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Landowner satisfaction with the Wetlands Reserve Program in Wisconsin.

Authors:  Ken Forshay; Hem Nalini Morzaria-Luna; Brack Hale; Katie Predick
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.

Authors:  Adena R Rissman; Lynn Lozier; Tosha Comendant; Peter Kareiva; Joseph M Kiesecker; M Rebecca Shaw; Adina M Merenlender
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings.

Authors:  Robert I McDonald; Chris Yuan-Farrell; Charles Fievet; Matthias Moeller; Peter Kareiva; David Foster; Ted Gragson; Ann Kinzig; Lauren Kuby; Charles Redman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.

Authors:  George N Wallace; David M Theobald; Tawnya Ernst; Katherine King
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.

Authors:  Adena Rissman; Menka Bihari; Christopher Hamilton; Christina Locke; David Lowenstein; Melissa Motew; Jessica Price; Robert Smail
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Farmer participation in U.S. Farm Bill conservation programs.

Authors:  Adam P Reimer; Linda S Prokopy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.

Authors:  James R Farmer; Doug Knapp; Vicky J Meretsky; Charles Chancellor; Burnell C Fischer
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Conservation covenants on private land: issues with measuring and achieving biodiversity outcomes in Australia.

Authors:  James A Fitzsimons; C Ben Carr
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.

Authors:  Dianne A Stroman; Urs P Kreuter
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 6.789

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species.

Authors:  Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire; Jeremy Pittman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.