Literature DB >> 17531049

Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.

Adena R Rissman1, Lynn Lozier, Tosha Comendant, Peter Kareiva, Joseph M Kiesecker, M Rebecca Shaw, Adina M Merenlender.   

Abstract

Conservation easements are one of the primary tools for conserving biodiversity on private land. Despite their increasing use, little quantitative data are available on what species and habitats conservation easements aim to protect, how much structural development they allow, or what types of land use they commonly permit. To address these knowledge gaps, we surveyed staff responsible for 119 conservation easements established by the largest nonprofit easement holder, The Nature Conservancy, between 1985 and 2004. Most easements (80%) aimed to provide core habitat to protect species or communities on-site, and nearly all were designed to reduce development. Conservation easements also allowed for a wide range of private uses, which may result in additional fragmentation and habitat disturbance. Some residential or commercial use, new structures, or subdivision of the property were permitted on 85% of sampled conservation easements. Over half (56%) allowed some additional buildings, of which 60% restricted structure size or building area. Working landscape easements with ranching, forestry, or farming made up nearly half (46%) of the easement properties sampled and were more likely than easements without these uses to be designated as buffers to enhance biodiversity in the surrounding area. Our results demonstrate the need for clear restrictions on building and subdivision in easements, research on the compatibility of private uses on easement land, and greater public understanding of the trade-offs implicit in the use of conservation easements for biodiversity conservation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531049     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00660.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  13 in total

1.  Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Dianne Stroman; Urs P Kreuter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.

Authors:  Adena Rissman; Menka Bihari; Christopher Hamilton; Christina Locke; David Lowenstein; Melissa Motew; Jessica Price; Robert Smail
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; Susan I Stewart; Todd J Hawbaker; Urs Gimmi; Anna M Pidgeon; Curtis H Flather; Roger B Hammer; David P Helmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Wildlife Conservation and Private Protected Areas: The Discrepancy Between Land Trust Mission Statements and Their Perceptions.

Authors:  Ashley A Dayer; Amanda D Rodewald; Richard C Stedman; Emily A Cosbar; Eric M Wood
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  How much does it cost to expand a protected area system? Some critical determining factors and ranges of costs for Queensland.

Authors:  Vanessa M Adams; Daniel B Segan; Robert L Pressey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting.

Authors:  Josie Carwardine; Kerrie A Wilson; Matt Watts; Andres Etter; Carissa J Klein; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Whither the Rangeland?: Protection and conversion in California's Rangeland ecosystems.

Authors:  D Richard Cameron; Jaymee Marty; Robert F Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.

Authors:  Robert F Baldwin; Paul B Leonard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The growth of easements as a conservation tool.

Authors:  Isla S Fishburn; Peter Kareiva; Kevin J Gaston; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.

Authors:  Richard Schuster; Peter Arcese
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.