Literature DB >> 24114348

Farmer participation in U.S. Farm Bill conservation programs.

Adam P Reimer1, Linda S Prokopy.   

Abstract

Conservation policy in agricultural systems in the United States relies primarily on voluntary action by farmers. Federal conservation programs, including the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, offer incentives, both financial and technical, to farmers in exchange for adoption of conservation practices. Understanding motivations for (as well as barriers to) participation in voluntary programs is important for the design of future policy and effective outreach. While a significant literature has explored motivations and barriers to conservation practice adoption and participation in single programs, few studies in the U.S. context have explored general participation by farmers in one place and time. A mixed-methods research approach was utilized to explore farmer participation in all U.S. Farm Bill programs in Indiana. Current and past program engagement was high, with nearly half of survey respondents reporting participation in at least one program. Most participants had experience with the Conservation Reserve Program, with much lower participation rates in other programs. Most interview participants who had experience in programs were motivated by the environmental benefits of practices, with incentives primarily serving to reduce the financial and technical barriers to practice adoption. The current policy arrangement, which offers multiple policy approaches to conservation, offers farmers with different needs and motivations a menu of options. However, evidence suggests that the complexity of the system may be a barrier that prevents participation by farmers with scarce time or resources. Outreach efforts should focus on increasing awareness of program options, while future policy must balance flexibility of programs with complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114348     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0184-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change.

Authors:  D Tilman; J Fargione; B Wolff; C D'Antonio; A Dobson; R Howarth; D Schindler; W H Schlesinger; D Simberloff; D Swackhamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices.

Authors:  D Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Public policy, private landholders: perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management.

Authors:  Chris Cocklin; Naomi Mautner; Jacqui Dibden
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.

Authors:  Adam Baumgart-Getz; Linda Stalker Prokopy; Kristin Floress
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.

Authors:  Katie Moon; Chris Cocklin
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 6.  Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  N N Rabalais; R E Turner; W J Wiseman
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Dianne Stroman; Urs P Kreuter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.

Authors:  Seth H Lutter; Ashley A Dayer; Jeffery L Larkin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Midwestern US Farmers Perceive Crop Advisers as Conduits of Information on Agricultural Conservation Practices.

Authors:  Francis R Eanes; Ajay S Singh; Brian R Bulla; Pranay Ranjan; Linda S Prokopy; Mary Fales; Benjamin Wickerham; Patrick J Doran
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The Impact of Federal and State Conservation Programs on Farmer Nitrogen Management.

Authors:  Adam P Reimer; Riva C H Denny; Diana Stuart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  An Examination of Growing Trends in Land Tenure and Conservation Practice Adoption: Results from a Farmer Survey in Iowa.

Authors:  Sarah Varble; Silvia Secchi; Caroline Gottschalk Druschke
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.

Authors:  Seth H Lutter; Ashley A Dayer; Emily Heggenstaller; Jeffery L Larkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Understanding Barriers to Participation in Cost-Share Programs For Pollinator Conservation by Wisconsin (USA) Cranberry Growers.

Authors:  Hannah R Gaines-Day; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.769

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.