M J Pekka Raatikainen1, David O Arnar2, Katja Zeppenfeld3, Jose Luis Merino4, Karl-Heinz Kuck5, Gerhardt Hindricks6. 1. Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä and University of Eastern Finland, Building 1 D/9, FI-40620 Jyväskylä, Kuopio, Finland pekka.raatikainen@fimnet.fi. 2. The Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, Landspitali - The National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland. 3. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands. 4. Unidad Electrofisiologia Cardiaca Robotizada-Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Cardiology, Ak St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany. 6. Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Centre, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim was to provide comprehensive information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) area. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has collected data on use of invasive arrhythmia managements since 2008. Fifty-one of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book 2015. This analysis is based on the current and previous editions of the EHRA White Book. Up-to-date information on procedure rates for the last 5 years together with information on economic resources, reimbursement systems, and training requirements are presented for each country and the five geographical ESC regions. In 2014, the CIED implantation rates per million population were highest in the Western followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The catheter ablation activity was largest in the Western followed by the Northern and Southern areas. Altogether the procedure rates were lowest in the Eastern European and in the non-European ESC countries. In the European ESC countries, the procedure rates were 3-10 times higher than in the non-European ESC countries. However, in some countries with a relatively low gross domestic product the procedure rates exceeded the average values indicating that utilization of arrhythmia therapies was not driven merely by the economic factors. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that considerable heterogeneity in the availability and utilization of arrhythmia therapies still exist across the ESC area. The data will hopefully aid in directing future activities and promote harmonization of cardiac arrhythmia care in the ESC countries. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The aim was to provide comprehensive information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) area. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has collected data on use of invasive arrhythmia managements since 2008. Fifty-one of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book 2015. This analysis is based on the current and previous editions of the EHRA White Book. Up-to-date information on procedure rates for the last 5 years together with information on economic resources, reimbursement systems, and training requirements are presented for each country and the five geographical ESC regions. In 2014, the CIED implantation rates per million population were highest in the Western followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The catheter ablation activity was largest in the Western followed by the Northern and Southern areas. Altogether the procedure rates were lowest in the Eastern European and in the non-European ESC countries. In the European ESC countries, the procedure rates were 3-10 times higher than in the non-European ESC countries. However, in some countries with a relatively low gross domestic product the procedure rates exceeded the average values indicating that utilization of arrhythmia therapies was not driven merely by the economic factors. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that considerable heterogeneity in the availability and utilization of arrhythmia therapies still exist across the ESC area. The data will hopefully aid in directing future activities and promote harmonization of cardiac arrhythmia care in the ESC countries. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Benedict M Wiles; Caroline A Illingworth; John R Paisey; Paul R Roberts; Stephen P Harden Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Michal M Farkowski; Mariusz Pytkowski; Aleksander Maciag; Dominik Golicki; Ilona Kowalik; Marcin Czech; Piotr Rucinski; Hanna Szwed Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Alexander Kypta; Hermann Blessberger; Juergen Kammler; Alexander Nahler; Kurt Neeser; Michael Lichtenauer; Christoph Edlinger; Joerg Kellermair; Daniel Kiblboeck; Thomas Lambert; Johannes Auer; Clemens Steinwender Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aimé Bonny; Marcus Ngantcha; Mohamed Jeilan; Emmy Okello; Bundhoo Kaviraj; Mohammed A Talle; George Nel; Eloi Marijon; Mahmoud U Sani; Zaheer Yousef; Kamilu M Karaye; Ibrahim A Touré; Mohamed A Awad; George Millogo; Jonas Kologo; Adama Kane; Romain Houndolo; Anastase Dzudié; Amam Mbakwem; Bongani M Mayosi; Ashley Chin Journal: Europace Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Shaun Giancaterino; Marin Nishimura; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Kurt S Hoffmayer; Frederick T Han; Farshad Raissi; Gordon Ho; David Krummen; Gregory K Feld; Jonathan C Hsu Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-05-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Laura A Hatfield; Daniel B Kramer; Rita Volya; Matthew R Reynolds; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.501