Literature DB >> 28148576

Lead or be led: an update on leadless cardiac devices for general physicians.

Benedict M Wiles1, Paul R Roberts1.   

Abstract

Implantable cardiac devices have an increasingly important role. Pacemakers remain the only effective treatment for symptomatic bradycardia; cardiac resynchronisation therapy is a proven treatment for heart failure; and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are superior to medical therapy in prevention of sudden cardiac death. Our ageing population has led to a rising number of device implants. Physicians in all specialties increasingly encounter patients with cardiac devices and require an understanding of their capabilities and functions. The rising prevalence of implantable devices has been matched by a parallel expanse in device technology. Leadless devices have become a reality and represent the future of device therapy. The absence of a transvenous lead offers a significant clinical advantage because of many well established issues related to lead complications. The leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous ICD are significant new products that are currently not well recognised or understood by general physicians. © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defibrillator; ICD; leadless; pacemaker; subcutaneous

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148576      PMCID: PMC6297585          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-1-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  18 in total

1.  Lessons from the first patient with an implanted pacemaker: 1958-2001.

Authors:  Berit Larsson; Håkan Elmqvist; Lars Rydén; Hans Schüller
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  The risks and benefits of transseptal endocardial pacing.

Authors:  Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Head-to-head comparison of arrhythmia discrimination performance of subcutaneous and transvenous ICD arrhythmia detection algorithms: the START study.

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Dominic A Theuns; Bradley P Knight; J Lacy Sturdivant; Rick Sanghera; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Mark A Wood; Martin C Burke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-10-28

6.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

Authors:  S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years.

Authors:  Thomas Kleemann; Torsten Becker; Klaus Doenges; Margit Vater; Jochen Senges; Steffen Schneider; Werner Saggau; Udo Weisse; Karlheinz Seidl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Justin Ezekowitz; Nicola Hooton; Ben Vandermeer; Carol Spooner; Donna M Dryden; Richard L Page; Mark A Hlatky; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.

Authors:  Angelo Auricchio; Peter-Paul Delnoy; Christian Butter; Johannes Brachmann; Lieselot Van Erven; Stefan Spitzer; Tiziano Moccetti; Martin Seifert; Thanasie Markou; Karolyi Laszo; François Regoli
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark.

Authors:  Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt; Jens Brock Johansen; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lead or be led: an update on leadless cardiac devices for general physicians.

Authors:  David E Ward
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.659

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.