| Literature DB >> 26285568 |
Ralph Akoto1,2, Jonas Müller-Hübenthal3, Maurice Balke4, Malte Albers5, Bertil Bouillon6, Philip Helm7, Marc Banerjee8, Jürgen Höher9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone tunnel enlargement is a phenomenon present in all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)- reconstruction techniques. It was hypothesized that press-fit fixation using a free autograft bone plug reduces the overall tunnel size in the tibial tunnel.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26285568 PMCID: PMC4545716 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0656-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Comparison of the matched pair groups
| Matched pairs | Age (yrs.) | Associated injuries | Associated surgery | Graft thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF1/IF1 | 18/20 | −/− | −/− | 8.5/9.0 |
| PF2/IF2 | 18/18 | MT/MT | PMR/PMR | 8.0/8.0 |
| PF3/IF3 | 51/46 | MT/MT | −/− | 8.0/8.0 |
| PF4/IF4 | 29/32 | −/− | −/− | 9.0/8.5 |
| PF5/IF5 | 39/34 | MT/MT | −/− | 8.0/7.5 |
| PF6/IF6 | 22/25 | CD,MT/CD,MT | PMR/PMR | 9.0/9.0 |
| PF7/IF7 | 24/21 | MT/MT | MR/MR | 9.0/8.5 |
| PF8/IF8 | 26/29 | MT/MT | −/− | 8.5/8.0 |
| PF9/IF9 | 22/25 | −/− | −/− | 8.5/9.0 |
| PF10/IF10 | 20/22 | −/− | −/− | 9.0/9.0 |
| PF11/IF11 | 28/25 | MT,CD/MT,CD | −/− | 8.5/8.0 |
| PF12/IF12 | 21/24 | MT/MT | −/− | 8.0/8.5 |
MT = meniscal tear
CD = chondral damage
PMR = partial meniscus resection
MR = meniscal repair
Rehabilitation protocol
| day 0-5 | • Immobilization in a 0° splint |
|---|---|
| • Lymphatic drain, cryotherapy | |
| • Three point gait, partial-weight bearing (up to 15 kg) | |
| • Active/passive range of motion 0/0/60 | |
| day 5 -21 | • Active/passive range of motion 0/0/90 |
| • Three point gait, partial-weight bearing (up to 20–30 kg) in a brace | |
| • Lymphatic drainage, cryotherapy | |
| • Quadriceps strengthening | |
| day 21-42 | • Full weight-bearing with brace |
| • Free active/passive range of motion | |
| • Quadriceps strengthening | |
| • Cycling, ergometer | |
| week 6-12 | • Muscle-strength training |
| • Swimming, aquajogging | |
| week 13-26 | • Continuing strengthening exercises |
| • Running if tolerated | |
| 6-9 months | • Return to sports if muscle strength is above 90° of the contralateral side |
Fig. 1Measurement of the bone tunnel diameter. PF group parasagittal (a) and paracoronar (c); IF group parasagittal (b) and paracoronar (d). Three measurements were performed, starting at the level of the tibial cortex (TS0; TC0) as well s 1 cm (TS1; TC1) and 2 cm (TS2; TC2) distal from the cortex.
Fig. 2The bone tunnel diameters for each subject of the PF group (a) and IF group (b) at the level of the cortex (T0) and one and two centimeter distal (T1) three month postoperative shown as columns. The diameter of the intraoperative used reamer is illustrated as a line. Columns below the line indicate a reduction; columns above represent a widening of the tibial bone tunnel diameter.
Mean values and SD of bone tunnel diameter, size of intraoperative reamer and bone tunnel widening
| tunnel diameter [mm] | reamer/screw size [mm] | tunnel widening | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | T0 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 9.5 | +5 % | .034 |
| T1 | 8.0 ± 1.1 | 9.5 | −15 % | .001 | |
| IF | T0 | 10.5 ± 0.8 | 9.0 | +14 % | .001 |
| T1 | 11.4 ± 1.1 | 9.0 | +21 % | <.001 | |
Fig. 3Mean bone tunnel diameters after follow up at the level of the joint line (T0) and one and two centimeter distally (T1) three month after surgery. The IF group showed a higher mean bone tunnel diameter than the PF group at T0 and T1, at T1 it was statistically significant.
Fig. 4Analysis of bony integration and bone tunnel morphology in the CT scan three month postoperatively. In the PF Group (a) all cases of the free autologous bone block (white arrow) showed bony integrated with homogenous spongeous bony structure and no sclerosis between bone block and tunnel wall. In the IF group (b) for all cases a tough-shaped bone tunnel dilatation immediately adjacent to the interference screw and a sclerosis zone between the inner bone tunnel and the interference screw was observed (black arrow).
Subjective and objective results at follow up
| Mean and SD or n (%) | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF group (n = 10) | IF group (n = 11) | |||
| Lachman test | negative | 9(90) | 9(82) | .60 |
| 1+ | 1(10) | 2(18) | ||
| Pivot-shift Test | negative | 8(80) | 7(64) | .48 |
| (+) | 1(10) | 3(27) | ||
| 1+ | 1(10) | 1(9) | ||
| Rolimeter | 1.5 (0.9)mm | 1.7(1.1)mm | .15 | |
| IKDC objective | A | 8(80) | 7(64) | .32 |
| B | 2(20) | 2(18) | ||
| C | 2(18) | |||
| IKDC subjevtive | 89.5(8.3) | 85.3(9.0) | .8 | |
| Tegner activity score | 7,4(1.4) | 8.2(1.0) | .18 | |