Literature DB >> 19953224

Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Milford H Marchant1, S Clifton Willimon, Emily Vinson, Ricardo Pietrobon, William E Garrett, Laurence D Higgins.   

Abstract

Bone tunnel widening poses a problem for graft fixation during revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Large variability exists in the utilization of imaging modalities for evaluating bone tunnels in pre-operative planning for revision ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify the most reliable imaging modality for identifying bone tunnels and assessing tunnel widening, and specifically, to validate the reliability of radiographs, MRI, and CT using intra- and inter-observer testing. Data was retrospectively collected from twelve patients presenting for revision ACL surgery. Five observers twice measured femoral and tibial tunnels at their widest point using digital calipers in coronal and sagittal planes. Measurements were corrected for magnification. Tunnel identification, diameter measurements, and cross-sectional area (CSA) calculations were recorded. A categorical classification of tunnel measurements was created to apply clinical significance to the measurements. Using kappa statistics, intra- and inter-observer reliability testing was performed. CT demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for tunnel identification. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was significantly less for MRI and radiographs. CT revealed superior reliability versus either radiographs or MRI for CSA analysis. Intra-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.66, 0.5, and 0.37, respectively. Inter-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.65, 0.39, and 0.32, respectively. Our results demonstrate CT is the most reliable imaging modality for evaluation of ACL bone tunnels as proven by superior intra- and inter-observer testing results when compared to MRI and radiographs. Radiographs and MRI were not reliable, even for simply identifying the presence of a bone tunnel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953224     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0952-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; M Nagano; M Kurosaka; H Muratsu; K Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation.

Authors:  J-U Buelow; R Siebold; A Ellermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of outlet fixation on tunnel widening.

Authors:  F Alan Barber; Bryan Spruill; Maryann Sheluga
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Wilson; Anthony Kantaras; Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  K A Jansson; A Harilainen; J Sandelin; P T Karjalainen; H J Aronen; K Tallroth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  C Fink; M Zapp; K P Benedetto; W Hackl; C Hoser; M Rieger
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Tunnel enlargement and changes in synovial fluid cytokine profile following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  S P Zysk; P Fraunberger; A Veihelmann; M Dörger; T Kalteis; M Maier; C Pellengahr; H J Refior
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  40 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joon Ho Wang; Jae Gyoon Kim; Do Kyung Lee; Hong Chul Lim; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Platelet-rich plasma: does it help reduce tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Antonio Vadalà; Raffaele Iorio; Angelo De Carli; Matteo Ferretti; Daniele Paravani; Ludovico Caperna; Carlo Iorio; Andrea Gatti; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using RigidFix compared with extracortical fixation.

Authors:  Osmar Valadao Lopes; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli; Luiz Henrique Cunha Leite; Bruce Quatrin Buzzeto; Paulo Renato Fernades Saggin; André Kuhn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Gen Yoshida; Yo Hara; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  How to read post-operative radiographs and CT scans after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Anagha P Parkar; Miraude E A M P Adriaensen; Torbjørn Strand; Eivind Inderhaug; Thomas Harlem; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Quantification of tibial bone loss in antegrade versus retrograde tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of tunnel diameters prior to revision ACL reconstruction: a comparison to computed tomography.

Authors:  Björn Holger Drews; Cornelia Merz; Jochen Huth; Daniel Gulkin; Joachim Guelke; Florian Gebhard; Frieder Mauch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Painful knee joint after ACL reconstruction using biodegradable interference screws- SPECT/CT a valuable diagnostic tool? A case report.

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Tom Adler; Helmut Rasch; Rolf W Hügli; Niklaus F Friederich; Markus P Arnold
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2010-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.