Literature DB >> 26284638

Is Real-Time Feedback of Burn-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Settings Practical and Useful? A Pilot Study Implementing the Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire.

Colleen M Ryan1, Austin F Lee, Lewis E Kazis, Gabriel D Shapiro, Jeffrey C Schneider, Jeremy Goverman, Shawn P Fagan, Chao Wang, Julia Kim, Robert L Sheridan, Ronald G Tompkins.   

Abstract

Long-term follow-up care of survivors after burn injuries can potentially be improved by the application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs can inform clinical decision-making and foster communication between the patient and provider. There are no previous reports using real-time, burn-specific PROMs in clinical practice to track and benchmark burn recovery over time. This study examines the feasibility of a computerized, burn-specific PROM, the Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire (YABOQ), with real-time benchmarking feedback in a burn outpatient practice. The YABOQ was redesigned for formatting and presentation purposes using images and transcribed to a computerized format. The redesigned questionnaire was administered to young adult burn survivors (ages 19-30 years, 1-24 months from injury) via an ipad platform in the office before outpatient visits. A report including recovery curves benchmarked to a nonburned relatively healthy age-matched population and to patients with similar injuries was produced for the domains of physical function and social function limited by appearance. A copy of the domain reports as well as a complete copy of the patient's responses to all domain questions was provided for use during the clinical visit. Patients and clinicians completed satisfaction surveys at the conclusion of the visit. Free-text responses, included in the satisfaction surveys, were treated as qualitative data adding contextual information about the assessment of feasibility. Eleven patients and their providers completed the study for 12 clinical visits. All patients found the ipad survey and report "easy" or "very easy" to use. In nine instances, patients "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that it helped them communicate their situation to their doctor/nurse practitioner. Patients "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the report helped them understand their course of recovery in 10 visits. In 11 visits, the patients "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they would recommend this feedback to others. Qualitative comments included: "it helped organize my thoughts of recovery," "it opened lines of communication with the doctor," "it showed me how far I have come, and how far I need to go," and "it raised questions I would not have thought of." Only four of 12 provider surveys agreed that it helped them understand a patient's condition; however, in two visits, the providers stated that it helped identify a pertinent clinical issue. During two visits, providers stated that a treatment plan was discussed or recommended based on the survey results. Separately, qualitative comments from the providers included "survey was not sensitive enough to identify that this patient needed surgery for their scars." This is the first report describing clinical use of a burn-specific patient reported outcome measure. Real-time feedback using the ipad YABOQ was well received for the most part by the clinicians and burn survivors in the outpatient clinic setting. The information provided by the reports can be tested in a future randomized controlled clinical study evaluating impacts on physician decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26284638     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  10 in total

1.  Associations between interim patient-reported outcome measures and functional status at discharge from rehabilitation for non-specific lumbar impairments.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Daniel Deutscher; Julie Fritz; Michael A Kallen; Karon F Cook; Deanna Hayes; Jerome E Mioduski; Linda J Woodhouse
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Assessing child quality of life impairments following pediatric burn injuries: Rasch analysis of the children's dermatology life quality index.

Authors:  Carisa Parrish; R Trent Haines; Dylan Stewart; Margo Szabo; Jill Caradec; Susan Ziegfeld; Elizabeth Reynolds; Rick Ostrander
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Are burns a chronic condition? Examining patient reported outcomes up to 20 years after burn injury-A Burn Model System National Database investigation.

Authors:  Cailin A Abouzeid; Audrey E Wolfe; Pengsheng Ni; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran; Flora M Hammond; Radha Holavanahalli; Kara A McMullen; Kimberly Roaten; Oscar Suman; Barclay T Stewart; Steven Wolf; Ross Zafonte; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.697

4.  Measuring the impact of burn injury on the parent-reported health outcomes of children 1-to-5 years: Item pool development for the Preschool1-5 Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile.

Authors:  Gabrielle G Grant; Keri J S Brady; Frederick J Stoddard; Walter J Meyer; Kathleen S Romanowski; Philip H Chang; Lynda E Painting; Laura A Fowler; Judith K Nelson; Khushbu F Patel; R Christopher Sheldrick; Alice Carter; Robert L Sheridan; Mary D Slavin; Petra Warner; Tina L Palmieri; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Patient-reported Outcome Measures: A Stethoscope for the Patient History.

Authors:  Cornelia L Griggs; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 13.787

6.  The National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System: Twenty Years of Contributions to Clinical Service and Research.

Authors:  Jeremy Goverman; Katie Mathews; Radha K Holavanahalli; Andrew Vardanian; David N Herndon; Walter J Meyer; Karen Kowalske; Jim Fauerbach; Nicole S Gibran; Gretchen J Carrougher; Dagmar Amtmann; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.819

7.  Burn survivors injured as children exhibit resilience in long-term community integration outcomes: A life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) study.

Authors:  Sara Cartwright; Cayla Saret; Gabriel D Shapiro; Pengsheng Ni; Robert L Sheridan; Austin F Lee; Molly Marino; Amy Acton; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice.

Authors:  Alexandra O Robertson; Valerija Tadić; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Satisfaction with life after burn: A Burn Model System National Database Study.

Authors:  J Goverman; K Mathews; D Nadler; E Henderson; K McMullen; D Herndon; W Meyer; J A Fauerbach; S Wiechman; G Carrougher; C M Ryan; J C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  Extreme response style bias in burn survivors.

Authors:  Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Lily Sonis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Alan M Jette; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.