Literature DB >> 26284465

The effect of genetic test-based risk information on behavioral outcomes: A critical examination of failed trials and a call to action.

Jehannine Austin1,2.   

Abstract

Encouraging individuals at risk for common complex disease like heart disease, cancer, and diabetes to adopt lifestyle changes (e.g., smoking cessation, exercise, proper nutrition, increased screening) could be powerful public health tools to decrease the enormous personal and economic burden of these conditions. Theoretically, genetic risk information appears to be a compelling tool that could be used to provoke at-risk individuals to adopt these lifestyle changes. Unfortunately, however, numerous studies now have shown that providing individuals with genetic test-based risk information has little to no impact on their behavior. In this article (a commentary not a systematic review), the failed trials in which genetic information has been used as a tool to induce behavior change will be critically examined in order to identify new and potentially more effective ways forward.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral change; behavioral economics; biases; cancer; complex disorders; diabetes; genetic counseling; genetic risk; heart disease; heuristics; lifestyle modification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26284465      PMCID: PMC4715431          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  15 in total

1.  Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Melissa L Finucane; Ellen Peters; Donald G MacGregor
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review.

Authors:  A Edwards; J Gray; A Clarke; J Dundon; G Elwyn; C Gaff; K Hood; R Iredale; S Sivell; C Shaw; H Thornton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-01-18

5.  Ten things that motivational interviewing is not.

Authors:  William R Miller; Stephen Rollnick
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2009-03

Review 6.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A T Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Clare Watkinson; Sophie Attwood; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

8.  Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Kelsey E O'Brien; Jessica L Waxler; Jason L Vassy; Linda M Delahanty; Laurie G Bissett; Robert C Green; Katherine G Stember; Candace Guiducci; Elyse R Park; Jose C Florez; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Maartje M van Stralen; Robert West
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Medical management adherence as an outcome of genetic counseling in a pediatric setting.

Authors:  Sarah Rutherford; Xue Zhang; Carrie Atzinger; Jennifer Ruschman; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Counselees' Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Shelly Hovick; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Erynn Gordon; Barbara Bernhardt; Lisa Wawak; Karen Wernke; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Amanda E Toland; J S Roberts; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Genomic Counseling for Patients Receiving Personalized and Actionable Complex Disease Reports.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Kandamurugu Manickam; Erynn S Gordon; Shelly Hovick; J Scott Roberts; Amanda Ewart Toland; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  EMR documentation of physician-patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomic results.

Authors:  K Sweet; A C Sturm; T Schmidlen; S Hovick; J Peng; K Manickam; A Salikhova; J McElroy; L Scheinfeldt; A E Toland; J S Roberts; M Christman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Integrating precision cancer medicine into healthcare-policy, practice, and research challenges.

Authors:  Gabrielle Bertier; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Vassilis Ragoussis; Yann Joly
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 6.  ALDH2 polymorphism and alcohol-related cancers in Asians: a public health perspective.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Chang; Jenn-Ren Hsiao; Che-Hong Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 7.  Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments.

Authors:  Cathryn M Lewis; Evangelos Vassos
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 11.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.