Literature DB >> 26283205

Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of patients with radiographically occult, palpable breast abnormalities.

Nicolas Ajkay1, Erica V Bloomquist2, Robert C G Martin1, Thomas G Frazier2, Andrea V Barrio3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who present with occult, palpable breast abnormalities on radiographs represent a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) would be an accurate method for diagnosing and excluding malignancy in these patients.
METHODS: The records of all patients undergoing FNAC at our institution between 2010 and 2012 were queried; 173 patients with 175 palpable breast masses without an imaging correlate were included.
RESULTS: Of 175 FNAC performed, 2 (1%) were malignant, 16 (9%) were suspicious, and 157 (90%) were benign (n = 75) or nondiagnostic (n = 82). All 16 suspicious FNAC underwent an additional biopsy, of which 4 were malignant. FNAC led to the identification of 6 (3.4%) occult malignancies. At a median follow-up of 16.3 months, 1 patient within the benign cohort was found to have an incidental 2.5 mm cancer identified on reduction mammaplasty, which was unrelated to the index mass. The negative predictive value of FNAC in benign patients was 100%.
CONCLUSION: FNAC detected malignancy in a small but significant percentage of patients with a palpable mass and negative breast imaging while excluding carcinoma in the remaining patients. FNAC may be included in the evaluation of patients with occult, palpable breast masses demonstrated on radiography.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26283205      PMCID: PMC4747039          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  13 in total

1.  Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.

Authors:  M A Dennis; S H Parker; A J Klaus; A T Stavros; T I Kaske; S B Clark
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Clinically palpable breast abnormalities with normal imaging: is clinically guided biopsy still required?

Authors:  H Gumus; M Gumus; P Mills; D Fish; H Devalia; S E Jones; P A Jones; Ali R Sever
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  Special report: Consensus conference III. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Abram Recht; Michael D Lagios; Ira J Bleiweiss; Peter W Blumencranz; Terri Gizienski; Steven E Harms; Jay Harness; Roger J Jackman; V Suzanne Klimberg; Robert Kuske; Gary M Levine; Michael N Linver; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Hope Rugo; Kathy Schilling; Debu Tripathy; Frank A Vicini; Pat W Whitworth; Shawna C Willey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.582

5.  Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Reshma Ariga; Kenneth Bloom; Vijaya B Reddy; Larry Kluskens; Darius Francescatti; Kambiz Dowlat; Popi Siziopikou; Paolo Gattuso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Management of palpable but radiologically occult breast abnormalities.

Authors:  Sreekumar Sundara Rajan; Jonathan White; Adam Peckham-Cooper; Sally Lane; Mark Lansdown
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.319

7.  Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  Luke G Gutwein; Darwin N Ang; Huazhi Liu; Julia K Marshall; Steven N Hochwald; Edward M Copeland; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Common breast problems.

Authors:  Brooke Salzman; Stephenie Fleegle; Amber S Tully
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.

Authors:  Linda Moy; Priscilla J Slanetz; Richard Moore; Sameer Satija; Eren D Yeh; Kathleen A McCarthy; Deborah Hall; Mary Staffa; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Elkan Halpern; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The value of 6-month interval imaging after benign radiologic-pathologic concordant minimally invasive breast biopsy.

Authors:  Demitra T Manjoros; Abigail E Collett; Jose J Alberty-Oller; Thomas G Frazier; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Liquid-based and Conventional Cytology in Diagnosis of Breast Mass.

Authors:  Shirin Kord; Maral Mokhtari; Sedigheh Tahmasebi
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Does fine-needle aspiration biopsy still have a place in the diagnosis of breast lesions?

Authors:  Marzanna Obrzut; Marian Cholewa; Jakub Baran; Agnieszka Obrzut-Palusińska; Ewa Kurczab
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2018-04-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.