Literature DB >> 12433603

Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

Reshma Ariga1, Kenneth Bloom, Vijaya B Reddy, Larry Kluskens, Darius Francescatti, Kambiz Dowlat, Popi Siziopikou, Paolo Gattuso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses in women younger and older than 40 years of age.
METHODS: All women who had FNA biopsy with subsequent tissue biopsy were included. The cytologic diagnoses were classified into three groups: malignant, suspicious, or benign. Histopathologic correlation was based on either a needle core biopsy, an excisional biopsy, or a mastectomy specimen.
RESULTS: A total of 1,158 fine-needle aspirations performed between 1982 and 2000, on women being evaluated for a clinically palpable breast mass were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of 231 patients aged 40 years and younger, and group II consisted of 927 patients aged 41 years and older. In group I there were 117 (51%) malignant FNA diagnoses, and only 1 (1%) false-positive case, subsequently diagnosed on histopathologic material as an atypical papillomatosis. There were 20 (9%) cases diagnosed as suspicious on FNA. On histopathology 10 were malignant, and 10 were benign. Of the 91 (39%) cases interpreted as benign, only 1 (1%) was a false negative. In group II, which comprised 927 patients, there were 693 (74%) malignant FNA diagnoses, and 3 (less than 1%) false-positive cases, which on follow-up histopathologic examination revealed 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias and 1 atypical papilloma. There were 90 (10%) cases diagnosed as suspicious on FNA. On histopathology, 68 were malignant and 22 were benign. Of the 131 (14%) lesions interpreted as benign, there were 18 false-negative cases (14%), which included 17 infiltrating carcinomas and 1 ductal carcinoma in-situ. Twelve (1%) of the cases were inadequate for the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were remarkably high and comparable in both groups: group I had 99% sensitivity, 99% positive predictive value, 99% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value; and group II had 98% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 99% positive predictive value, and 86% negative predictive value. The overall rate of false-positive (less than 1%) and false-negative cases (9%) is comparable with published literature. Suspicious cases should be further evaluated, as our study revealed more than 50% to be malignant. The incidence of malignancy in patients presenting with a clinically palpable breast mass with follow-up biopsy was 51% in patients aged 40 years and younger and 74% in patients aged 41 years and older. Fine-needle aspiration is an excellent diagnostic tool in assessing clinically palpable breast masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433603     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  18 in total

1.  [Percutaneous large core breast biopsy].

Authors:  K Prechtel; J de Waal; A Nerlich; D Hölzel; J Weitz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Touch Imprint Cytology and Stereotactically-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions: 15-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P A Fasching; M R Bani; M P Lux; S Jud; C Rauh; C Bayer; D L Wachter; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; M Uder; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of patients with radiographically occult, palpable breast abnormalities.

Authors:  Nicolas Ajkay; Erica V Bloomquist; Robert C G Martin; Thomas G Frazier; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Early detection of breast, cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancers in low resource countries: an integrated approach.

Authors:  Mahesh K Shetty; Adhemar Longatto-Filho
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-04

7.  Triple assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer in Kashmir.

Authors:  Masooda Jan; Javeed Ahmad Mattoo; Nazir Ahmad Salroo; Shahnawaz Ahangar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of breast lumps.

Authors:  Mulazim Hussain Bukhari; Madiha Arshad; Shahid Jamal; Shahida Niazi; Shahid Bashir; Irfan M Bakhshi
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-06-21

9.  The clinical effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with palpable breast lesions seen at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria: A 10-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Cornelius O Ukah; Olayiwola A Oluwasola
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Inadequate fine needle aspiration biopsy samples: pathologists versus other specialists.

Authors:  G S Gomez-Macías; R Garza-Guajardo; J Segura-Luna; O Barboza-Quintana
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.