Literature DB >> 11274555

Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.

M A Dennis1, S H Parker, A J Klaus, A T Stavros, T I Kaske, S B Clark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the authors' experience with patients who presented with breast lumps and had normal mammograms and normal sonograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The findings from 600 lumps in 486 women with no focal ultrasonographic (US) mass or mammographic finding in the area of clinical concern were retrospectively studied. Evaluated parameters included the individual reporting the lump, qualitative descriptors for the physical finding, mammographic density, US characteristics in the area of concern, whether there was a change in imaging and/or physical examination results, and whether there were diagnostic biopsy findings at follow-up. The study group included 540 lumps in 435 women who had a minimum mammographic and clinical follow-up of 2 years, as well as 60 additional lumps in 51 patients who underwent biopsy.
RESULTS: No patient in the nonbiopsy group developed carcinoma at the initial site of concern during a mean mammographic and clinical follow-up period of 43 months, and all biopsy specimens were benign (negative predictive value, 100%).
CONCLUSION: Results of this retrospective study suggest that breast biopsy may be avoided in women with palpable abnormalities when both US and mammography depict normal tissue at the lump site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274555     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap35186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary study on comparison with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and dedicated workstation.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Sung Ui Shin; Myung Eun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Bilateral orbital tumour as the presentation of mammographically occult breast cancer.

Authors:  M Lell; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hafner; A Magener; W A Bautz; B F Tomandl
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of patients with radiographically occult, palpable breast abnormalities.

Authors:  Nicolas Ajkay; Erica V Bloomquist; Robert C G Martin; Thomas G Frazier; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Benign breast lesions: Ultrasound.

Authors:  N Masciadri; C Ferranti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-20

5.  Value of Ultrasound in the Detection of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Farideh Gharekhanloo; Mostafa Morad Haseli; Saadat Torabian
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-09

6.  Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sun Ah Kim; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Ann Yi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.

Authors:  Karen A Lee; Nishi Talati; Rebecca Oudsema; Sharon Steinberger; Laurie R Margolies
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27

8.  Diagnostics in Patients Suspect for Breast Cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Madelon M Voets; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Liset H J Veneklaas; Srirang Manohar; Mariël Brinkhuis; Jeroen Veltman; Linda de Munck; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Mireille J M Broeders; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.