Literature DB >> 26280889

High resolution FDG-microPET of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque components underlying enhanced FDG uptake.

Jin Liu1, William S Kerwin2, James H Caldwell2, Marina S Ferguson2, Daniel S Hippe2, Adam M Alessio2, Vanesa Martinez-Malo2, Kristi Pimentel2, Robert S Miyaoka2, Ted R Kohler3,4, Thomas S Hatsukami4, Chun Yuan5,6.   

Abstract

This study sought to discover which atherosclerotic plaque components co-localize with enhanced [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in carotid positron emission tomography (PET) images. Although in vivo PET currently lacks the resolution, high-resolution ex vivo FDG-microPET with histology validation of excised carotid plaque might accomplish this goal. Thirteen patients were injected with FDG before carotid endarterectomy. After excision, the plaque specimens were scanned by microPET and magnetic resonance imaging, and then serially sectioned for histological analysis. Two analyses were performed using generalized linear mixed models: (1) a PET-driven analysis which sampled high and low FDG uptake areas from PET images to identify their components in matched histology specimens; and (2) a histology-driven analysis where specific plaque components were selected and matched to corresponding PET images. In the PET-driven analysis, regions of high FDG uptake were more likely to contain inflammatory cells (p < 0.001) and neovasculature (p = 0.008) than regions of low FDG uptake. In the histology-driven analysis, regions with inflammatory cells (p = 0.001) and regions with loose extracellular matrix (p = 0.001) were associated with enhanced FDG uptake. Furthermore, areas of complex inflammatory cell infiltrate (co-localized macrophages, lymphocytes and foam cells) had the highest FDG uptake among inflammatory subgroups (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in carotid plaque, regions of inflammatory cell infiltrate, particularly complex one, co-localized with enhanced FDG uptake in high-resolution FDG-microPET images. Loose extracellular matrix and areas containing neovasculature also produced FDG signal. This study points to the potential ability of FDG-PET to detect the cellular components of the vulnerable plaque.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Carotid plaque; FDG; Inflammation; MicroPET; Vulnerable plaque

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280889      PMCID: PMC4707987          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0739-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  What can be seen by 18F-FDG PET in atherosclerosis imaging? The effect of foam cell formation on 18F-FDG uptake to macrophages in vitro.

Authors:  Mikako Ogawa; Satoki Nakamura; Yuriko Saito; Mutsumi Kosugi; Yasuhiro Magata
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Plaque neovascularization and antiangiogenic therapy for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Brendan Doyle; Noel Caplice
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Inflammation in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Peter Libby
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Distribution of inflammation within carotid atherosclerotic plaques with high-risk morphological features: a comparison between positron emission tomography activity, plaque morphology, and histopathology.

Authors:  Amparo L Figueroa; Sharath S Subramanian; Ricardo C Cury; Quynh A Truong; Joseph A Gardecki; Guillermo J Tearney; Udo Hoffmann; Thomas J Brady; Ahmed Tawakol
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  High-resolution [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and coregistered magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque from a patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  William Kerwin; Adam Alessio; Marina Ferguson; Thomas Hatsukami; James Caldwell; Robert Miyaoka; Ted Kohler; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  FDG-PET imaging of atherosclerosis: Do we know what we see?

Authors:  Yuri Sheikine; Kamran Akram
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  Investigating vulnerable atheroma using combined (18)F-FDG PET/CT angiography of carotid plaque with immunohistochemical validation.

Authors:  Leon J Menezes; Carl W Kotze; Obi Agu; Toby Richards; Jocelyn Brookes; Vicky J Goh; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Raymondo Endozo; Richard Harvey; Syed W Yusuf; Peter J Ell; Ashley M Groves
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  High-resolution imaging of human atherosclerotic carotid plaques with micro 18F-FDG PET scanning exploring plaque vulnerability.

Authors:  Marleen G Masteling; Clark J Zeebregts; René A Tio; Jan-Cees Breek; Uwe J F Tietge; Jan Freark de Boer; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Hendrikus H Boersma; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  PET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jason M Tarkin; Francis R Joshi; James H F Rudd
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 32.419

View more
  9 in total

1.  Topical issue: multimodality imaging in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Johan H C Reiber; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Carotid plaque imaging and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Guangming Zhu; Jason Hom; Ying Li; Bin Jiang; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; David Saloner; Michele Porcu; Yanrong Zhang; Luca Saba; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

Review 3.  PET Imaging of Atherosclerotic Disease: Advancing Plaque Assessment from Anatomy to Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Nicholas R Evans; Jason M Tarkin; Mohammed M Chowdhury; Elizabeth A Warburton; James H F Rudd
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Monocyte and Macrophage Dynamics in the Cardiovascular System: JACC Macrophage in CVD Series (Part 3).

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad; Filip K Swirski; Claudia Calcagno; Clinton S Robbins; Willem Mulder; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Vande Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Advances in Radiopharmaceutical Sciences for Vascular Inflammation Imaging: Focus on Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kevin Prigent; Jonathan Vigne
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  [18F]FDG and [18F]NaF as PET markers of systemic atherosclerosis progression: A longitudinal descriptive imaging study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Reijrink; S A de Boer; C A Te Velde-Keyzer; J K E Sluiter; R A Pol; H J L Heerspink; M J W Greuter; J L Hillebrands; D J Mulder; R H J A Slart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 8.  Immunometabolism orchestrates training of innate immunity in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Julia van Tuijl; Leo A B Joosten; Mihai G Netea; Siroon Bekkering; Niels P Riksen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 9.  Trained Immunity: An Underlying Driver of Inflammatory Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chao Zhong; Xiaofeng Yang; Yulin Feng; Jun Yu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.