Literature DB >> 20202637

FDG-PET imaging of atherosclerosis: Do we know what we see?

Yuri Sheikine1, Kamran Akram.   

Abstract

Imaging atherosclerosis may help to identify subjects harboring rupture-prone atherosclerotic plaques who may benefit from preventive interventions. Potential of plaques to rupture depends on their structural changes and metabolic activation, which are difficult to assess using anatomic imaging modalities. Recent studies suggested that functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) utilizing fluorine-18-labeled 2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) has the potential to assess plaque metabolism and add to prediction of vascular risk. Aortic, iliac, and carotid plaques can be detected with FDG-PET, even though not all plaques exhibit high FDG uptake. Detection of coronary artery plaques is more cumbersome due to technical limitations of PET and fast movement of these vessels during cardiac and respiratory cycles. Studies on substrate accumulating FDG in plaques are contradictory and mostly do not extend beyond correlation analyses. Vascular FDG uptake has an excellent short-term stability, but larger fluctuations of uptake long-term, which may complicate interpretation of such changes in therapeutic trials. FDG uptake in major arteries correlates with some cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis markers, but clinical utility of such correlations is unclear. What is more important is that recently reported studies in cancer patients showed correlation between higher baseline FDG uptake and subsequent cardiovascular mortality. Anti-atherogenic therapy and therapeutic lifestyle changes seem to decrease vascular FDG uptake but it is not clear whether the latter predicts subsequent lower morbidity and mortality. These initial findings suggest that vascular FDG-PET may in the future find some utility in management of patients with atherosclerosis, but a number of important issues need to be addressed first. We need to: (1) determine optimal standard ways of performing imaging and quantifying vascular FDG uptake; (2) understand molecular mechanisms governing FDG accumulation in plaques; (3) perform studies prospectively linking vascular FDG uptake to cardiovascular events in non-cancer patients. As of today, vascular FDG-PET is not ready for its prime time in clinical practice. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202637     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  24 in total

1.  Noninvasive Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Coronary Arterial Inflammation.

Authors:  Amr Abdelbaky; Ahmed Tawakol
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  PET imaging of chemokine receptors in vascular injury-accelerated atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yongjian Liu; Richard Pierce; Hannah P Luehmann; Terry L Sharp; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque calcification using F18-NaF PET-CT.

Authors:  Maria João Vidigal Ferreira; Manuel Oliveira-Santos; Rodolfo Silva; Andreia Gomes; Nuno Ferreira; Antero Abrunhosa; João Lima; Mariano Pego; Lino Gonçalves; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Noninvasive assessment of hypoxia in rabbit advanced atherosclerosis using ¹⁸F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Jesus Mateo; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Juan J Badimon; Zahi A Fayad; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: is it ready for prime time? A review.

Authors:  Leticia Fernández-Friera; Borja Ibáñez; Valentín Fuster
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker in a Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis.

Authors:  Peter C Grayson; Sara Alehashemi; Armin A Bagheri; Ali Cahid Civelek; Thomas R Cupps; Mariana J Kaplan; Ashkan A Malayeri; Peter A Merkel; Elaine Novakovich; David A Bluemke; Mark A Ahlman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 7.  PET imaging of aortic atherosclerosis: Is combined imaging of plaque anatomy and function an amaranthine quest or conceivable reality?

Authors:  Gary R Small; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  High resolution FDG-microPET of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque components underlying enhanced FDG uptake.

Authors:  Jin Liu; William S Kerwin; James H Caldwell; Marina S Ferguson; Daniel S Hippe; Adam M Alessio; Vanesa Martinez-Malo; Kristi Pimentel; Robert S Miyaoka; Ted R Kohler; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Quantitative thoracic aorta calcification assessment by 18F-NaF PET/CT and its correlation with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disorders and increasing age.

Authors:  Koosha Paydary; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Saeid Gholami; Sara Pourhassan; Thomas J Werner; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Optimizing 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of vessel wall inflammation: the impact of 18F-FDG circulation time, injected dose, uptake parameters, and fasting blood glucose levels.

Authors:  Jan Bucerius; Venkatesh Mani; Colin Moncrieff; Josef Machac; Valentin Fuster; Michael E Farkouh; Ahmed Tawakol; James H F Rudd; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.