Literature DB >> 21990578

Investigating vulnerable atheroma using combined (18)F-FDG PET/CT angiography of carotid plaque with immunohistochemical validation.

Leon J Menezes1, Carl W Kotze, Obi Agu, Toby Richards, Jocelyn Brookes, Vicky J Goh, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Raymondo Endozo, Richard Harvey, Syed W Yusuf, Peter J Ell, Ashley M Groves.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Inflammation and angiogenesis are hypothesized to be important factors contributing to plaque vulnerability, whereas calcification is suggested to confer stability. To investigate this in vivo, we combined CT angiography and PET and compared the findings with immunohistochemistry for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (18 men, 3 women; mean age ± SD, 68.3 ± 7.3) undergoing carotid endarterectomy were recruited for combined carotid (18)F-FDG PET/CT angiography. Plaque (18)F-FDG uptake was quantified with maximum standardized uptake value, and CT angiography quantified percentage plaque composition (calcium and lipid). Surgical specimens underwent ex vivo CT aiding image registration, followed by immunohistochemical staining for CD68 (macrophage density) and vascular endothelial growth factor (angiogenesis). Relationships between imaging and immunohistochemistry were assessed with Spearman rank correlation and multivariable regression.
RESULTS: The mean (±SD) surgically excised carotid plaque (18)F-FDG metabolism was 2.4 (±0.5) versus 2.2 (±0.3) contralaterally (P = 0.027). There were positive correlations between plaque (18)F-FDG metabolism and immunohistochemistry with CD68 (ρ = 0.55; P = 0.011) and vascular endothelial growth factor (ρ = 0.47; P = 0.031). There was an inverse relationship between plaque (18)F-FDG metabolism and plaque percentage calcium composition on CT (ρ = -0.51; P = 0.018) and between calcium composition and immunohistochemistry with CD68 (ρ = -0.57; P = 0.007). Regression showed that maximum standardized uptake value and calcium composition were independently significant predictors of angiogenesis, and calcium composition was a predictor of macrophage density.
CONCLUSION: We provide in vivo evidence that increased plaque metabolism is associated with increased biomarkers of angiogenesis and inflammation, whereas plaque calcification is inversely related to PET and histologic biomarkers of inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21990578     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  26 in total

1.  Expression of NF-κB, CD68 and CD105 in carotid atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Shiyan Ren; Xueqiang Fan; Liang Peng; Lin Pan; Changan Yu; Jie Tong; Wenjian Zhang; Peng Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Molecular imaging in atherosclerosis: FDG PET.

Authors:  David Rosenbaum; Antoine Millon; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Imaging angiogenesis using 68Ga-NOTA-PRGD2 positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with severe intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Shi Shu; Li Zhang; Yi Cheng Zhu; Fang Li; Li Ying Cui; Hao Wang; Yi Sun; Pei Lin Wu; Zhao Hui Zhu; Bin Peng
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Scintillating balloon-enabled fiber-optic system for radionuclide imaging of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Raiyan T Zaman; Hisanori Kosuge; Colin Carpenter; Conroy Sun; Michael V McConnell; Lei Xing
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  (18)F-FDG PET and vascular inflammation: time to refine the paradigm?

Authors:  Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Inflammation: Current Status.

Authors:  Dima A Hammoud
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Identification of inflamed atherosclerotic lesions in vivo using PET-CT.

Authors:  Mateja Kaja Jezovnik; Nina Zidar; Luka Lezaic; Borut Gersak; Pavel Poredos
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.092

8.  High resolution FDG-microPET of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque components underlying enhanced FDG uptake.

Authors:  Jin Liu; William S Kerwin; James H Caldwell; Marina S Ferguson; Daniel S Hippe; Adam M Alessio; Vanesa Martinez-Malo; Kristi Pimentel; Robert S Miyaoka; Ted R Kohler; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Future imaging of atherosclerosis: molecular imaging of coronary atherosclerosis with (18)F positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Daniel J Scherer; Peter J Psaltis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  Molecular imaging to identify the vulnerable plaque--from basic research to clinical practice.

Authors:  Dennis H M Kusters; Jan Tegtmeier; Leon J Schurgers; Chris P M Reutelingsperger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.