Literature DB >> 26279881

Crystal structure of 5-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ate: an unexpected salt arising from the deca-rboxylation of both precursors.

José A Fernandes1, Bing Liu2, João P C Tomé3, Luís Cunha-Silva2, Filipe A Almeida Paz1.   

Abstract

Both the 3-amino-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazolium cation and the pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ate anion in the title salt, C2H5N4 (+)·C5H3N2O2 (-), were formed by an unexpected deca-rboxylation reaction, from 5-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carb-oxy-lic acid and pyrazine-2,3-di-carb-oxy-lic acid, respectively. The dihedral angle between the pyrazine ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.008 Å) and the carboxyl-ate group in the anion is 3.7 (3)°. The extended structure of the salt contains a supra-molecular zigzag tape in which cations and anions are engaged in strong and highly directional N-H⋯N,O hydrogen bonds, forming R 2 (2)(8) and R 2 (2)(9) graph-set motifs. The packing between the tapes is mediated by π-π stacking inter-actions between the triazole and pyrazine rings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; deca­rboxylation; hydrogen bonding; ionothermal synthesis; triazolium salt; π–π stacking inter­actions

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279881      PMCID: PMC4518908          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501172X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

A remarkable feature of ionothermal synthesis is the fact that ionic liquids (ILs) can act simultaneously as sustainable solvents and structure-directing agents (also known as templates). This has been widely demonstrated by their potential in the discovery of unprecedented crystalline mat­erials (Xu et al., 2013 ▸). Following our inter­est in the design and preparation of new types of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), we have been exploring the use of 5-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carb­oxy­lic acid (H2atrc) and pyrazine-2,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (H2Pzdc) as a double-ligand system in the presence of transition metal centers using ionothermal synthetic conditions. In the presence of AgNO3 the obtained product revealed, however, to be an unexpected organic salt (Bond, 2007 ▸) composed of the 3-amino-2H,4H(+)-1,2,4-triazolium cation and the pyrazine-2-carboxyl­ato anion.

Structural commentary

The title compound is a product of decomposition of the H2atrc and H2Pzdc organic mol­ecules by way of decarb­oxyl­ation leading to, respectively, 3-amino-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazolium [(C2H5N4)+] and pyrazine-2-carboxyl­ate [(C5H3N2O2)−]. The asymmetric unit is composed of one of each of these moieties, as depicted in both the chemical diagram and in Fig. 1 ▸.
Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of the title salt. Non-H atoms are represented as displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level, while H atoms are depicted as small spheres with arbitrary radii. The atomic labelling scheme for all non-H atoms is provided. Hydrogen bonds are represented as dashed lines.

Supra­molecular features

The cation present in the title compound is rich in groups capable of forming strong N—H⋯N,O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (see Table 1 ▸ for further geometrical details), many highly directional with the observed <(D—H⋯A) inter­action angles being above 165°. These supra­molecular contacts are the main driving force which mediate the crystal packing features of the title compound. Indeed, the donation of hydrogen atoms from the cation to the carboxyl­ate group of an adjacent anion (N6—H6B⋯O2 and N5—H5⋯O1) forms the known structurally robust (8) graph-set motif (dashed pink lines in Fig. 2 ▸) (Grell et al., 1999 ▸). This graph-set motif has already been found in salts containing the title compound cation and carb­oxy­lic acids (see Database survey below). Two other inter­actions, N6—H6A⋯N1 (dashed aqua lines) and N4—H4A⋯O2, describe a second (9) hydrogen-bond motif. In contrast to the previous graph-set motif, the (9) ring has not been observed in structures containing the title-compound cation. The zigzag alternation of these two graph-set motifs leads to the formation of a highly coplanar supra­molecular tape running parallel to the [010] direction of the unit cell (Fig. 2 ▸). Adjacent tapes inter­act by way of weak π–π stacking contacts between triazole and pyrazine rings, with the inter-centroid distance being 3.75 (3) Å (dashed orange lines in Fig. 2 ▸).
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
N4H4AO20.90(1)1.77(1)2.655(3)166(3)
N5H5O1i 0.90(1)1.73(1)2.632(3)176(3)
N6H6BO2i 0.90(1)1.97(1)2.853(3)169(3)
N6H6AN10.90(1)2.21(1)3.099(3)169(3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 2

Supra­molecular tape running parallel to the [010] direction of the unit cell. N—H⋯N and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are depicted as dashed aqua and pink lines, respectively. Graph-set motifs present in the structure are highlighted. For geometric details of the represented supra­molecular contacts, see Table 1 ▸. π–π stacking inter­actions between two adjacent supra­molecular tapes are shown as orange dashed lines.

Database survey

Triazole mol­ecules have been extensively used in the preparation of organic co-crystals (Kastelic et al., 2011 ▸; Remenar et al., 2003 ▸), and a survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸) revealed the existence of about a dozen of crystallographic reports of co-crystals of the title compound cation (Byriel et al., 1992 ▸; Essid et al., 2013 ▸; Joo et al., 2013 ▸; Luo et al., 2013 ▸; Lynch et al., 1992 ▸, 1998 ▸, 1999 ▸; Lynch, Smith, Byriel & Kennard, 1994 ▸; Lynch, Smith, Byriel, Kennard et al., 1994 ▸; Matulková et al., 2007 ▸; Smith et al., 1996 ▸). The only compounds known with both of the title compound entities present is a bimetallic complex also containing Cd2+ and NO3− ions (Chen et al., 2009 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

5-Amino-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carb­oxy­lic acid (H2atrc, 98% purity), pyrazine-2,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (H2Pzdc, 97% purity), 1-methyl­imidazole (99%+ purity), 1-bromo­butane (99% purity) and AgNO3 (99%+ purity) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and were used as received without further purification. 1-Butyl-3-methyl­imidazolium bromide ([BMI]Br) was prepared according to the literature method (Parnham & Morris, 2006 ▸) and was isolated as a pale-yellow oil (yield of ca 78%). AgNO3 (0.0687 g; 0.400 mmol), H2atrc (0.0510 g; 0.400 mmol) and H2Pzdc (0.0607 g; 0.361 mmol) were mixed with 0.49 g of [BMI]Br and 0.3 mL of distilled water in a ca 25 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel reaction vessel. The resulting mixture was heated to 383 K for 7 days. The vessel was then allowed to cool to ambient temperature at a rate of ca 1 K h−1. Small colourless crystals of the title compound were directly isolated from the vessel contents.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. Hydrogen atoms bound to carbon were placed at idealized positions with C—H = 0.95 Å, and included in the final structural model in a riding-motion approximation with the isotropic thermal displacement parameters fixed at 1.2U eq of the carbon atom to which they are attached. Hydrogen atoms associated with nitro­gen atoms were located directly from difference Fourier maps and were included in the model with the N—H and H⋯H (only for the –NH2 groups) distances restrained to 0.90 (1) and 1.55 (1) Å, respectively, in order to ensure a chemically reasonable environment for these groups. These hydrogen atoms were modelled with the isotropic thermal displacement parameters fixed at 1.5U eq(N).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC2H5N4 +C5H3N2O2
M r 208.19
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c ()7.0599(5), 12.1868(8), 10.8385(6)
()103.593(4)
V (3)906.40(10)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.09 0.04 0.03
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998)
T min, T max 0.989, 0.997
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections12089, 1858, 1037
R int 0.077
(sin /)max (1)0.625
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.059, 0.133, 1.02
No. of reflections1858
No. of parameters148
No. of restraints5
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)0.19, 0.20

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▸), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501172X/hb7446sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501172X/hb7446Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901501172X/hb7446Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1407396 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C2H5N4+·C5H3N2O2F(000) = 432
Mr = 208.19Dx = 1.526 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.0599 (5) ÅCell parameters from 1298 reflections
b = 12.1868 (8) Åθ = 2.6–19.7°
c = 10.8385 (6) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
β = 103.593 (4)°T = 296 K
V = 906.40 (10) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.09 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm
Bruker X8 Kappa CCD APEXII diffractometer1037 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.077
ω / φ scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.989, Tmax = 0.997k = −15→15
12089 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
1858 independent reflections
Refinement on F25 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.133w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0599P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1858 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
148 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.2890 (3)0.79063 (17)0.49872 (19)0.0389 (6)
N20.0664 (3)0.79145 (18)0.2472 (2)0.0468 (6)
C10.2177 (4)0.8840 (2)0.4404 (2)0.0334 (6)
C20.1066 (4)0.8815 (2)0.3165 (2)0.0412 (7)
H20.05710.94760.27970.049*
C30.1381 (4)0.6995 (2)0.3059 (2)0.0448 (7)
H30.11470.63340.26230.054*
C40.2461 (4)0.6993 (2)0.4297 (3)0.0442 (7)
H40.29120.63260.46680.053*
C50.2560 (4)0.9921 (2)0.5101 (2)0.0378 (7)
O10.1745 (3)1.07442 (14)0.45075 (15)0.0481 (6)
O20.3628 (3)0.99415 (14)0.61986 (16)0.0543 (6)
N30.7128 (4)0.94320 (19)0.8957 (2)0.0622 (8)
N40.6167 (4)0.88117 (19)0.7929 (2)0.0476 (6)
H4A0.535 (3)0.912 (2)0.7253 (18)0.071*
N50.7480 (3)0.76575 (18)0.93596 (19)0.0417 (6)
H50.778 (4)0.6996 (13)0.972 (2)0.063*
N60.5628 (4)0.6942 (2)0.7405 (2)0.0540 (7)
H6A0.473 (3)0.714 (2)0.6709 (19)0.081*
H6B0.585 (5)0.6271 (13)0.775 (3)0.081*
C60.6369 (4)0.7751 (2)0.8181 (2)0.0365 (7)
C70.7892 (5)0.8695 (2)0.9782 (3)0.0553 (8)
H70.86490.88611.05840.066*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0450 (14)0.0290 (13)0.0400 (12)−0.0006 (11)0.0049 (10)0.0005 (10)
N20.0557 (16)0.0387 (14)0.0406 (12)0.0008 (12)0.0005 (11)−0.0086 (12)
C10.0331 (15)0.0309 (15)0.0355 (13)−0.0004 (13)0.0067 (11)0.0022 (12)
C20.0495 (18)0.0320 (16)0.0367 (14)0.0061 (14)−0.0007 (13)0.0020 (12)
C30.0487 (19)0.0352 (17)0.0478 (16)−0.0016 (15)0.0059 (14)−0.0099 (13)
C40.0499 (18)0.0299 (16)0.0497 (16)0.0036 (14)0.0056 (14)0.0028 (13)
C50.0420 (17)0.0344 (16)0.0330 (13)0.0001 (14)0.0006 (12)0.0036 (12)
O10.0625 (14)0.0319 (11)0.0402 (10)0.0058 (9)−0.0074 (9)0.0021 (8)
O20.0708 (14)0.0375 (12)0.0399 (10)0.0067 (10)−0.0165 (10)−0.0025 (9)
N30.089 (2)0.0419 (15)0.0461 (14)0.0029 (15)−0.0032 (13)0.0024 (12)
N40.0625 (18)0.0367 (15)0.0386 (13)0.0037 (13)0.0019 (12)0.0061 (11)
N50.0480 (14)0.0362 (15)0.0359 (12)0.0025 (12)−0.0004 (11)0.0083 (11)
N60.0607 (18)0.0440 (16)0.0491 (15)−0.0005 (15)−0.0038 (13)0.0030 (13)
C60.0391 (17)0.0349 (18)0.0348 (13)0.0044 (13)0.0068 (12)0.0057 (12)
C70.074 (2)0.046 (2)0.0383 (15)0.0020 (17)−0.0026 (15)0.0012 (14)
N1—C41.335 (3)N3—C71.293 (3)
N1—C11.341 (3)N3—N41.384 (3)
N2—C21.323 (3)N4—C61.322 (3)
N2—C31.328 (3)N4—H4A0.902 (10)
C1—C21.387 (3)N5—C61.338 (3)
C1—C51.512 (3)N5—C71.353 (3)
C2—H20.9300N5—H50.901 (10)
C3—C41.379 (4)N6—C61.321 (3)
C3—H30.9300N6—H6A0.899 (10)
C4—H40.9300N6—H6B0.896 (10)
C5—O21.250 (2)C7—H70.9300
C5—O11.256 (3)
C4—N1—C1115.6 (2)C7—N3—N4102.9 (2)
C2—N2—C3114.9 (2)C6—N4—N3111.1 (2)
N1—C1—C2120.2 (2)C6—N4—H4A126 (2)
N1—C1—C5120.1 (2)N3—N4—H4A121.7 (19)
C2—C1—C5119.8 (2)C6—N5—C7105.9 (2)
N2—C2—C1124.4 (2)C6—N5—H5121.3 (18)
N2—C2—H2117.8C7—N5—H5132.7 (18)
C1—C2—H2117.8C6—N6—H6A115 (2)
N2—C3—C4122.0 (2)C6—N6—H6B115 (2)
N2—C3—H3119.0H6A—N6—H6B128 (3)
C4—C3—H3119.0N6—C6—N4126.2 (2)
N1—C4—C3123.0 (2)N6—C6—N5126.9 (2)
N1—C4—H4118.5N4—C6—N5106.9 (2)
C3—C4—H4118.5N3—C7—N5113.2 (2)
O2—C5—O1125.0 (2)N3—C7—H7123.4
O2—C5—C1119.3 (2)N5—C7—H7123.4
O1—C5—C1115.7 (2)
C4—N1—C1—C20.3 (4)N1—C1—C5—O1−176.1 (2)
C4—N1—C1—C5179.5 (2)C2—C1—C5—O13.1 (4)
C3—N2—C2—C11.2 (4)C7—N3—N4—C60.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2—N2−1.4 (4)N3—N4—C6—N6179.8 (3)
C5—C1—C2—N2179.4 (2)N3—N4—C6—N5−0.9 (3)
C2—N2—C3—C4−0.1 (4)C7—N5—C6—N6179.9 (3)
C1—N1—C4—C30.8 (4)C7—N5—C6—N40.6 (3)
N2—C3—C4—N1−1.0 (4)N4—N3—C7—N5−0.4 (4)
N1—C1—C5—O23.7 (4)C6—N5—C7—N3−0.1 (4)
C2—C1—C5—O2−177.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4A···O20.90 (1)1.77 (1)2.655 (3)166 (3)
N5—H5···O1i0.90 (1)1.73 (1)2.632 (3)176 (3)
N6—H6B···O2i0.90 (1)1.97 (1)2.853 (3)169 (3)
N6—H6A···N10.90 (1)2.21 (1)3.099 (3)169 (3)
  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A 1:1 cocrystal of fluconazole with salicylic acid.

Authors:  Jože Kastelic; Nina Lah; Danijel Kikelj; Ivan Leban
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns: some mathematical concepts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1999-12-01

5.  Crystal engineering of novel cocrystals of a triazole drug with 1,4-dicarboxylic acids.

Authors:  Julius F Remenar; Sherry L Morissette; Matthew L Peterson; Brian Moulton; J Michael MacPhee; Héctor R Guzmán; Orn Almarsson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  5-Amino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium hydrogen oxalate.

Authors:  Manel Essid; Houda Marouani; Salem S Al-Deyab; Mohamed Rzaigui
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-07-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.