Literature DB >> 24109361

5-Amino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium hydrogen oxalate.

Manel Essid1, Houda Marouani, Salem S Al-Deyab, Mohamed Rzaigui.   

Abstract

In the title salt, C2H5N4 (+)·C2HO4 (-), the hydrogen oxalate anions form corrugated chains parallel to the c axis, linked by inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The 5-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium cations are connected into centrosymmetric clusters via weak C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds forming nine-membered rings with an R 3 (3)(9) motif. These clusters are inter-connected via anions through N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, building a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24109361      PMCID: PMC3793774          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813019363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the properties of triazoles, see: Li et al. (2004 ▶); Mernari et al. (1998 ▶); Bentiss et al. (1999 ▶). For graph-set notation of hydrogen bonding, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For related structures, see: Matulková et al. (2007 ▶, 2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C2H5N4 +·C2HO4 M = 174.13 Trigonal, a = 23.093 (4) Å c = 6.603 (3) Å V = 3049.3 (16) Å3 Z = 18 Ag Kα radiation λ = 0.56080 Å μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.35 × 0.3 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 3909 measured reflections 3313 independent reflections 1929 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.060 wR(F 2) = 0.194 S = 1.04 3313 reflections 121 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS86 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813019363/pv2640sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813019363/pv2640Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813019363/pv2640Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C2H5N4+·C2HO4Dx = 1.707 Mg m3
Mr = 174.13Ag Kα radiation, λ = 0.56080 Å
Trigonal, R3Cell parameters from 25 reflections
Hall symbol: -R 3θ = 9–11°
a = 23.093 (4) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 6.603 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 3049.3 (16) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 180.35 × 0.3 × 0.25 mm
F(000) = 1620
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometerRint = 0.023
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Graphite monochromatorh = −1→33
non–profiled ω scansk = −1→33
3909 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
3313 independent reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1929 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.060Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.194H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0979P)2 + 1.6007P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3313 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.50 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.42 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.35441 (6)−0.03841 (6)0.4263 (2)0.0279 (3)
O40.50310 (6)−0.02945 (6)0.2759 (2)0.0304 (3)
O30.46709 (6)0.04345 (6)0.2350 (2)0.0268 (3)
O20.37748 (7)−0.12148 (6)0.4035 (3)0.0384 (4)
N30.40979 (7)−0.14645 (7)−0.1112 (2)0.0282 (3)
H50.4515−0.1183−0.12950.034*
N10.36951 (8)−0.06980 (8)−0.0972 (3)0.0310 (3)
N20.30499 (7)−0.18848 (8)−0.0659 (3)0.0308 (3)
H40.2661−0.1927−0.05010.037*
C30.36142 (7)−0.13134 (8)−0.0947 (2)0.0228 (3)
C20.46067 (7)−0.01195 (7)0.2875 (2)0.0205 (3)
C40.31868 (9)−0.23999 (9)−0.0656 (3)0.0338 (4)
H60.2877−0.2851−0.04800.041*
C10.39246 (8)−0.06374 (7)0.3785 (2)0.0217 (3)
N40.38176 (9)−0.21484 (9)−0.0939 (3)0.0429 (4)
H10.3155 (15)−0.0699 (15)0.467 (4)0.054 (8)*
H30.4074 (14)−0.0368 (14)−0.142 (4)0.049 (7)*
H20.3342 (14)−0.0667 (12)−0.113 (4)0.039 (6)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0205 (5)0.0209 (5)0.0446 (7)0.0121 (4)0.0104 (5)0.0068 (5)
O40.0229 (5)0.0301 (6)0.0442 (7)0.0179 (5)0.0058 (5)0.0057 (5)
O30.0183 (5)0.0208 (5)0.0405 (7)0.0091 (4)0.0014 (5)0.0076 (5)
O20.0334 (7)0.0216 (6)0.0648 (10)0.0172 (5)0.0158 (6)0.0122 (6)
N30.0185 (6)0.0235 (6)0.0423 (8)0.0103 (5)0.0040 (5)0.0025 (6)
N10.0276 (7)0.0244 (7)0.0437 (9)0.0149 (6)−0.0001 (6)0.0016 (6)
N20.0159 (5)0.0274 (7)0.0448 (9)0.0076 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0023 (6)
C30.0170 (6)0.0235 (7)0.0270 (7)0.0093 (5)0.0004 (5)−0.0004 (5)
C20.0177 (6)0.0206 (6)0.0237 (7)0.0101 (5)0.0000 (5)0.0008 (5)
C40.0219 (7)0.0183 (7)0.0541 (12)0.0047 (6)0.0015 (7)0.0026 (7)
C10.0203 (6)0.0195 (6)0.0279 (7)0.0120 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0037 (5)
N40.0336 (9)0.0314 (8)0.0665 (12)0.0184 (7)0.0035 (8)0.0027 (8)
O1—C11.3143 (19)N1—H30.88 (3)
O1—H10.87 (3)N1—H20.86 (3)
O4—C21.2351 (19)N2—C31.325 (2)
O3—C21.2607 (18)N2—C41.375 (2)
O2—C11.2099 (19)N2—H40.8600
N3—C31.331 (2)C2—C11.546 (2)
N3—N41.380 (2)C4—N41.284 (3)
N3—H50.8600C4—H60.9300
N1—C31.338 (2)
C1—O1—H1110.1 (19)N3—C3—N1126.00 (15)
C3—N3—N4108.56 (14)O4—C2—O3127.23 (15)
C3—N3—H5125.7O4—C2—C1116.06 (13)
N4—N3—H5125.7O3—C2—C1116.71 (13)
C3—N1—H3118.4 (19)N4—C4—N2107.94 (15)
C3—N1—H2117.1 (17)N4—C4—H6126.0
H3—N1—H2118 (2)N2—C4—H6126.0
C3—N2—C4108.94 (14)O2—C1—O1124.85 (15)
C3—N2—H4125.5O2—C1—C2121.67 (14)
C4—N2—H4125.5O1—C1—C2113.47 (12)
N2—C3—N3106.69 (14)C4—N4—N3107.86 (15)
N2—C3—N1127.24 (15)
C4—N2—C3—N3−0.3 (2)O3—C2—C1—O2168.06 (17)
C4—N2—C3—N1−177.35 (19)O4—C2—C1—O1166.66 (15)
N4—N3—C3—N20.6 (2)O3—C2—C1—O1−12.8 (2)
N4—N3—C3—N1177.71 (18)N2—C4—N4—N30.5 (2)
C3—N2—C4—N4−0.1 (2)C3—N3—N4—C4−0.7 (2)
O4—C2—C1—O2−12.5 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O3i0.87 (3)1.72 (3)2.5845 (17)174 (3)
N1—H2···O1ii0.86 (3)2.29 (3)3.087 (2)155 (2)
N1—H3···O4iii0.88 (3)2.06 (3)2.925 (2)171 (3)
N2—H4···O4iv0.862.092.892 (2)154
N2—H4···O2iv0.862.282.878 (2)127
N3—H5···O3iii0.861.942.7652 (18)161
C4—H6···N4v0.932.413.313 (3)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O3i 0.87 (3)1.72 (3)2.5845 (17)174 (3)
N1—H2⋯O1ii 0.86 (3)2.29 (3)3.087 (2)155 (2)
N1—H3⋯O4iii 0.88 (3)2.06 (3)2.925 (2)171 (3)
N2—H4⋯O4iv 0.862.092.892 (2)154
N2—H4⋯O2iv 0.862.282.878 (2)127
N3—H5⋯O3iii 0.861.942.7652 (18)161
C4—H6⋯N4v 0.932.413.313 (3)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Density functional theory and ab initio studies of geometry, electronic structure and vibrational spectra of novel benzothiazole and benzotriazole herbicides.

Authors:  Wei Li; Qiaofeng Wu; Yong Ye; Mindao Luo; Ling Hu; Yinghong Gu; Fei Niu; Jiming Hu
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.098

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Crystal structure of 5-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium pyrazine-2-carboxyl-ate: an unexpected salt arising from the deca-rboxylation of both precursors.

Authors:  José A Fernandes; Bing Liu; João P C Tomé; Luís Cunha-Silva; Filipe A Almeida Paz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-06-24

2.  1-Methyl-piperazine-1,4-dium bis-(hydrogen oxalate).

Authors:  Manel Essid; Houda Marouani; Mohamed Rzaigui
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-02-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.