| Literature DB >> 33195451 |
Qasim A Majid1, Annabelle T R Fricker2, David A Gregory2, Natalia Davidenko3, Olivia Hernandez Cruz1,4, Richard J Jabbour1, Thomas J Owen1, Pooja Basnett5, Barbara Lukasiewicz5, Molly Stevens4, Serena Best3, Ruth Cameron3, Sanjay Sinha6, Sian E Harding1, Ipsita Roy1,2.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) constitute a major fraction of the current major global diseases and lead to about 30% of the deaths, i.e., 17.9 million deaths per year. CVD include coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmias, heart failure, heart valve diseases, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Cardiac Tissue Engineering (CTE) aims to address these conditions, the overall goal being the efficient regeneration of diseased cardiac tissue using an ideal combination of biomaterials and cells. Various cells have thus far been utilized in pre-clinical studies for CTE. These include adult stem cell populations (mesenchymal stem cells) and pluripotent stem cells (including autologous human induced pluripotent stem cells or allogenic human embryonic stem cells) with the latter undergoing differentiation to form functional cardiac cells. The ideal biomaterial for cardiac tissue engineering needs to have suitable material properties with the ability to support efficient attachment, growth, and differentiation of the cardiac cells, leading to the formation of functional cardiac tissue. In this review, we have focused on the use of biomaterials of natural origin for CTE. Natural biomaterials are generally known to be highly biocompatible and in addition are sustainable in nature. We have focused on those that have been widely explored in CTE and describe the original work and the current state of art. These include fibrinogen (in the context of Engineered Heart Tissue, EHT), collagen, alginate, silk, and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). Amongst these, fibrinogen, collagen, alginate, and silk are isolated from natural sources whereas PHAs are produced via bacterial fermentation. Overall, these biomaterials have proven to be highly promising, displaying robust biocompatibility and, when combined with cells, an ability to enhance post-MI cardiac function in pre-clinical models. As such, CTE has great potential for future clinical solutions and hence can lead to a considerable reduction in mortality rates due to CVD.Entities:
Keywords: alginate; cardiac tissue engineering; collagen; engineered heart tissue; fibrinogen; natural biomaterial; polyhydroxyalkanoate; silk
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195451 PMCID: PMC7644890 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.554597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1EHTs and the white box. (A) Four EHTs attached to a silicone rack are shown, and (B) inside media in a 24 well-plate. (C) A contraction is recorded by the movement of the blue boxes which pick up the contrast difference between the EHT and the background. (D) A picture of the outside of the white box. (E) Contraction measurements on traces from the white box. An example of an EHT contracting for 2 s is shown indicating how different parameters are calculated from contractions. Peak contraction is taken at the green boxes and RR scatter as seconds is calculated as time between the two boxes. Time to contraction (T1) is calculated at 10, 20, and 50% of the peak from the midline to the edge of the curve, and relaxation time (T2) is calculated in the same way. Contraction velocity and relaxation velocity are calculated as the derivative of the curve and shown by the pink line. Each small box on the Red and Pink lines shows a frame taken by the white box camera which runs at 100 f.p.s.
Figure 2Upscaling of EHTs to six well-format and use in a rabbit myocardial infarction model. (A) First generation and second generation EHTs with their Teflon spacers and silicone posts. (B) A live upscaled EHT in a six well-plate. (Ci) Left Anterior Descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation is shown on a rabbit heart with the ribs held open. (Cii) The EHT is attached to the heart with sutures. (Ciii) The pericardium is returned over the EHT.
Figure 3(A) Collagen structure. Three polypeptide subunits (α-chains) with a common triple helix configuration. These triple helices comprise a molecule of tropocollagen, the basic building block of collagen fibers and fibrils. (B) Distribution of cell-adhesive sequences in fibrillar collagens.
Figure 4(A) Schematic representation of freeze-drying process. Ice structure leads to pore shape, size, and orientation. (B) Examples of different morphologies of collagen scaffolds. Anisotropy in the microstructures were achieved by imposing temperature gradients during the phase of crystallization of water in collagen suspensions, using molding technology. Images from Cambridge Center for Medical Materials, University of Cambridge, UK are part of Figure 7 from Davidenko et al. (113). License for re-using these images had been obtained from Copyright holder (Elsevier).
Figure 5EDC-crosslinking. (A) In non-XL collagen two adjacent collagen helices: with a lysine (K) amine-containing sidechain and with the integrin-binding motif GFOGER with its crucial glutamate acidic (E) side chain. The carboxylate anion is free to coordinate a Mg2+ ion bound to the integrin α-subunit I domain, so that α1β1, α2β1, α10β1, or α11β1 can secure cell binding to the matrix. High cell adhesion. (B) EDC promotes the cross-linking of the glutamate (E) and aspartate (D) carboxylate group with the adjacent lysine (K) amine group. (C) Amide bond formation between adjacent collagen helices. The glutamate sidechain can no longer interact with integrins. EDC-crosslinking leads to the increase in scaffold stability to degradation and mechanical properties but affects the number of cell-binding sites with a negative effect on cell attachment. Data for graphs in the figure were replotted from Davidenko et al. (72) and Davidenko et al. (78).
Figure 6Representative alginate structure: (A) Monomers, (B) Chain conformation, (C) Block distribution (M-block, G-block, and MG or GM block), and (D) Schematic model of hydrogel formation “egg-box model”.
Figure 7(A) Two injectable gels (chitosan and alginate) and two epicardial patches (collagen β-glycerophosphate and alginate) were compared in terms of acute retention of stem cells in the infarcted heart (1, 2). Injection technique and volume, patch size, and attachment were optimized with rat hearts ex-vivo; (3) Mini-thoracotomy and guide suture placement; (4) Myocardial blanching was observed after ligation of the LAD; (5) Patches were placed at the infarct border zone cell-seeded side down with a single suture; (6) Patches remained in place for 24 h, when a bilateral thoracotomy was performed and aorta was cannulated for perfusion (191). (B) Epicardial microsphere patches improve cardiac functioning and VEGF(+) patches improve cardiac morphometry post-MI. (1) Myocardial infarction (MI) was induced in mice by left anterior descending artery ligation. Patches were transplanted onto the LV surface of the heart 4 days after MI, and fractional shortening (% FS) was measured for 4 weeks; (2) To compensate for variability at baseline (1-week post-MI, pre-implantation, t = 0) FS was also expressed as a percentage change over the 4-week time course (%Δ FS); (3) Tissue morphometry was assessed using Masson's trichrome stain. Patch/epicardial interference were identified under high magnification and are indicated with a broken yellow line (scale bar = 2 mm). Insets show vascular structure (arrows) in the patch areas (scale bar = 50 μm); (4) Left ventricular and patch morphometry were quantified using whole-slide scanned trichrome stained cross-sections (192).
Figure 8(A) Production of aqueous silk solutions from silk cocoons (1), Fibroin solution (2), Sericin solution (3) (B) Histological image of MI zones of heart for Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells/silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid (BMSC/SFH) patch shown after 8 weeks of infarction (233). (C) Nanopatterned silk substrate of nanopatterned acid-modified silk fibroin (AMSF) with deposited poly(pyrrole) (PPy) (1 cm2). SEM image of AMSF + PPy nanopatterned substrate. Cardiomyocytes fluorescently stained for α-actinin (green) and nuclei (blue). Cells on nanopatterned substrates exhibit elongated and aligned morphologies. Yellow arrows indicate the direction of the nanopattern. Scale bar: 25 mm; inset 10 mm (234). (D) Genipin crosslinked sericin hydrogel (1) schematic showing the anatomical site (black cross) of the occlusion of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (green line), the corresponding infarcted myocardial region (shaded area), and the injection site of the sericin/genipin hydrogel delivered via a syringe. (2) Macroscopic view of a wild-type heart with a layer of myocardium at the LAD-supplied area cut to open showing an in situ forming of genipin-crosslinked sericin hydrogel (yellow arrowhead). Scale bar, 1 mm (235). (E) Schematic representation of the fabrication of patterned silk films using microgrooved PDMS molds (1). Biocompatibility of silk films with cardiomyocytes: fluorescent microscopy images of confluent monolayers displaying unidirectional alignment of H9c2 (2) and Primary ventricular cardiomyocytes (PCMs) (3) on patterned silk films. Actin cytoskeleton (red: Rhodamine–phalloidin), nucleus [Hoechst 33342 (blue)]. White arrows indicate the direction of the alignment (scale bar−200 mm) (236).
Figure 9(A) The general structure of PHAs. (B) The R groups of various PHAs that have been utilized in cardiac tissue engineering. The short chain length PHAs (SCL-PHAs); monomers include 3HB: 3-hydroxybutyrate and 3HV: 3-hydroxyvalerate whilst for medium chain length PHAs (MCL-PHAs) that have been investigated monomers include 3HHx: 3-hydroxyhexanoate, 3HO: 3-hydroxyoctanoate, 3HD: 3-hydroxydecanoate and 3HDD: 3-hydroxydodecanoate.
Figure 10Macroscopic images of (A) Decellularized porcine valves impregnated with P(4HB) and implanted into the pulmonary position of sheep for 12 weeks display viability and retain the overall structure of the valve (263). (B) A tissue engineered heart valve derived from PGA, coated with P(4HB) and subsequently seeded with either adult stem cells or vascular cells. It has been placed into a self-expanding stent and is to be delivered to the pulmonary position of sheep for 8 weeks (264). (C) Aortic grafts derived solely from P(4HB) following molding using a CT generated structure of a human aortic valve. SV highlights the Sinus of Valsalva (265). (D) Solvent cast film derived from MCL-PHAs that has been utilized for LV cardiac regeneration (266, 267).
Advantages and disadvantages of natural materials used for cardiac tissue engineering.
| EHT | • Can be easily shaped or cast to the complex geometry of the myocardium, and so can provide efficient bonding to the native tissue | • A true adult cardiomyocyte phenotype has not been reproduced |
| Collagen | • It is inherently biocompatible, superior to that of many other natural polymers | • The low stiffness of gel-like systems and poor ability to create a spatial bio-mimetic environment somewhat limits its |
| Alginate | • Alginates are natural polysaccharides that are considered to be biocompatible, biodegradable, non-toxic, and non-immunogenic | • Mammals lack the alginase enzyme, therefore alginate is a non-degradable material, however, the partial oxidation of alginate chains promotes degradation under physiological conditions |
| PHAs | • Many polymers in the PHA family are highly flexible elastomers which make them ideal for soft tissue engineering | • The medical grade PHA production method is mostly quite expensive and not many commercial sources are available |
| Silk | • A variety of silk-based biomaterials have been approved by the FDA | • Silk usually has to be combined with other materials to make it suitable for cardiac applications |
| Chitin/chitosan | • They are biocompatible ( | • Chitin has a rigid crystalline structure, making it difficult to dissolve in common solvents ( |
| Decellularized heart | • It is biocompatible as it is derived from animal or human donors | • Decellularized heart can't be processed into as many different forms as other natural materials |
| Omentum | • Part of a patient's own omentum can be removed by a minimally invasive procedure ( | • Where used to make an implanted myocardial patch, two surgeries are required—one to harvest the omentum and one to implant the patch. Surgery comes with risks, especially for a patient with a heart condition |
Clinical trials using natural biomaterials in cardiac repair.
| Intracoronary delivery of engineered alginate implants—IK-5001 bioabsorbable cardiac matrix (BCM) (Bellerophon LLC)Clinical trial unique identifier: NCT01226563 | • Testing safety and feasibility of strategy in patients recovering from an extensive MI | ( |
| IK-5001 multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind, controlled trialClinical trial unique identifier: NCT01226563 | • Comparing the bioabsorbable cardiac matrix (BCM) with saline control to assess LV dilation and adverse clinical events within 6-months | ( |
| Intramyocardial injection of alginate hydrogel—Algisyl-LVRTM (LoneStar Heart Inc.)Clinical trial unique identifier: NCT00847964 | • Testing safety and feasibility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy | ( |
| Algisyl-LVRTM international, multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (AUGMENT-HF)Clinical trial unique identifier: NCT01311791 | • A trial to evaluate the safety and benefits of an alginate hydrogel for left ventricular modification | ( |
| A Phase I, Open-label Study of the Effects of Percutaneous Administration of an Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel, VentriGel, Following Myocardial InfarctionClinical trial unique identifier: NCT02305602 | • A trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility, and effects of VentriGel, an extracellular matrix hydrogel, delivered via trans-endocardial injection in post-MI patients | ( |