Literature DB >> 19567508

Differences in measured mammographic density in the menstrual cycle.

Gayane Hovhannisyan1, Lorraine Chow, Alexandra Schlosser, Martin J Yaffe, Norman F Boyd, Lisa J Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In premenopausal women, the sensitivity of screening mammography for detecting breast cancer has been reported to be greater in the follicular phase than in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, which may be due to differences in mammographic density. To examine this possible effect, we compared mammographic density in premenopausal women who had mammograms at different phases of the menstrual cycle.
METHODS: We recruited premenopausal women ages 40 to 49 years from two mammography units in Toronto, recorded the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) and measured mammographic density using Cumulus software. We classified the time of the mammography examination as having occurred in one of four intervals, 1 (first week after LMP), 2 (second week after LMP), 3 (third week after LMP) and 4 (>3 weeks after LMP), and compared mammographic density across intervals.
RESULTS: Of the 936 women included in the analysis, 620 were examined by film and 316 by digital mammography. There were small and statistically nonsignificant variations in breast dense, nondense area, and percent density over the menstrual cycle in women examined by film mammography. Marginally significant variation in percent density was observed in the digital subset due to significant differences in the amount of nondense tissue over the menstrual cycle.
CONCLUSION: Variations in mammographic density over the menstrual cycle were small and nonsignificant for women examined by either film or digital mammography. Thus, timing of mammography in menstrual cycle is unlikely to have a significant influence in breast cancer detection by screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567508     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  13 in total

1.  Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Agustin Garcia; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; Pulin Sheth; Sue Ellen Martin; Debra Hawes; Christy Russell; Heather MacDonald; Debu Tripathy; Min-Ying Su; Giske Ursin; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Min-Ying L Su; Fu-Ju Lei; Jia-Pei Wu; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Accuracy of screening mammography varies by week of menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Rod Walker; Donald L Weaver; Diana S M Buist; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Robert D Rosenberg; Mark B Dignan; Zhuo Tracy Zhang; Emily White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Effect of menstrual cycle phase on background parenchymal uptake at molecular breast imaging.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Celine M Vachon; Michael K O'Connor; Lynne T Shuster; Adam C Bartley; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Effects of isoflavones on breast density in pre- and post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Giri Madhavan; Jeffrey A Tice; Sam J Leinster; Aedín Cassidy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Correlation of endogenous hormonal levels, fibroglandular tissue volume and percent density measured using 3D MRI during one menstrual cycle.

Authors:  J H Chen; W P Chen; S Chan; D C Yeh; M Y Su; C E McLaren
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; Stephanie L Barnes; Angela M Jarrett; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Jeffery J Luci; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; John Virostko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms.

Authors:  M B I Lobbes; J P M Cleutjens; V Lima Passos; C Frotscher; M J Lahaye; K B M I Keymeulen; R G Beets-Tan; J Wildberger; C Boetes
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-11-20

9.  Sex steroid metabolism polymorphisms and mammographic density in pre- and early perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Mary E Sehl; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Laurel A Habel; Lesley M Butler; Maryfran R Sowers; Gail A Greendale; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Assessing Detection, Discrimination, and Risk of Breast Cancer According to Anisotropy Parameters of Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Ruisheng Jiang; Xiangmin Zeng; Shihang Sun; Zhijun Ma; Ximing Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.