Literature DB >> 26276399

Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance.

Timothy Jay Carney1, Geoffrey P Morgan2, Josette Jones3, Anna M McDaniel4, Michael T Weaver5, Bryan Weiner6, David A Haggstrom7.   

Abstract

RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES: Nationally sponsored cancer-care quality-improvement efforts have been deployed in community health centers to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening rates among vulnerable populations. Despite several immediate and short-term gains, screening rates remain below national benchmark objectives. Overall improvement has been both difficult to sustain over time in some organizational settings and/or challenging to diffuse to other settings as repeatable best practices. Reasons for this include facility-level changes, which typically occur in dynamic organizational environments that are complex, adaptive, and unpredictable. This study seeks to understand the factors that shape community health center facility-level cancer-screening performance over time. This study applies a computational-modeling approach, combining principles of health-services research, health informatics, network theory, and systems science.
METHODS: To investigate the roles of knowledge acquisition, retention, and sharing within the setting of the community health center and to examine their effects on the relationship between clinical decision support capabilities and improvement in cancer-screening rate improvement, we employed Construct-TM to create simulated community health centers using previously collected point-in-time survey data. Construct-TM is a multi-agent model of network evolution. Because social, knowledge, and belief networks co-evolve, groups and organizations are treated as complex systems to capture the variability of human and organizational factors. In Construct-TM, individuals and groups interact by communicating, learning, and making decisions in a continuous cycle. Data from the survey was used to differentiate high-performing simulated community health centers from low-performing ones based on computer-based decision support usage and self-reported cancer-screening improvement.
RESULTS: This virtual experiment revealed that patterns of overall network symmetry, agent cohesion, and connectedness varied by community health center performance level. Visual assessment of both the agent-to-agent knowledge sharing network and agent-to-resource knowledge use network diagrams demonstrated that community health centers labeled as high performers typically showed higher levels of collaboration and cohesiveness among agent classes, faster knowledge-absorption rates, and fewer agents that were unconnected to key knowledge resources. Conclusions and research implications: Using the point-in-time survey data outlining community health center cancer-screening practices, our computational model successfully distinguished between high and low performers. Results indicated that high-performance environments displayed distinctive network characteristics in patterns of interaction among agents, as well as in the access and utilization of key knowledge resources. Our study demonstrated how non-network-specific data obtained from a point-in-time survey can be employed to forecast community health center performance over time, thereby enhancing the sustainability of long-term strategic-improvement efforts. Our results revealed a strategic profile for community health center cancer-screening improvement via simulation over a projected 10-year period. The use of computational modeling allows additional inferential knowledge to be drawn from existing data when examining organizational performance in increasingly complex environments.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Community health centers; Computational modeling; Health Disparities; Learning health system; Network theory; Simulation; Systems-thinking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276399      PMCID: PMC5896023          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  17 in total

1.  Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Brian S Mittman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Face validity.

Authors:  S D Thomas; D K Hathaway; K L Arheart
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  The dynamics of social innovation.

Authors:  H Peyton Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  An informatics blueprint for healthcare quality information systems.

Authors:  Joyce C Niland; Layla Rouse; Douglas C Stahl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Knowledge management: organizing nursing care knowledge.

Authors:  Jane A Anderson; Pamela Willson
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Q       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar

6.  Chronic Care Model implementation for cancer screening and follow-up in community health centers.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Stephen H Taplin; Patrick Monahan; Steven Clauser
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

7.  Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers.

Authors:  Timothy Jay Carney; Geoffrey P Morgan; Josette Jones; Anna M McDaniel; Michael Weaver; Bryan Weiner; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Does the collaborative model improve care for chronic heart failure?

Authors:  Steven M Asch; David W Baker; Joan W Keesey; Michael Broder; Matthias Schonlau; Mayde Rosen; Peggy L Wallace; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Implementing colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: addressing cancer health disparities through a regional cancer collaborative.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; David Haggstrom; Tracy Jacobs; Ada Determan; Jennifer Granger; Wanda Montalvo; William M Snyder; Susan Lockhart; Ahmed Calvo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin; Sandy Cook; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Myriam Guillen; Catherine A Humikowski; Julie Koppert; James F Harrison; Susan Lippold; Cynthia T Schaefer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.