Literature DB >> 15172904

Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives.

Brian S Mittman1.   

Abstract

Intensive efforts are under way to improve health care quality and safety throughout the United States and abroad. Many of these efforts use the quality improvement collaborative method, an approach emphasizing collaborative learning and exchange of insights and support among a set of health care organizations. Unfortunately, the widespread acceptance and reliance on this approach are based not on solid evidence but on shared beliefs and anecdotal affirmations that may overstate the actual effectiveness of the method. More effective use of the collaborative method will require a commitment by users, researchers, and other stakeholders to rigorous, objective evaluation and the creation of a valid, useful knowledge and evidence base. Development of this evidence base will require improved conceptions of the nature of quality problems, quality improvement processes, and the types of research needed to elucidate these processes. Researchers, journal editors, and funding agencies must also cooperate to ensure that published evaluations are relevant, comprehensive, and cumulative.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172904     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  84 in total

1.  More black box to explore: how quality improvement collaboratives shape practice change.

Authors:  Eric K Shaw; Sabrina M Chase; Jenna Howard; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 2.  Quality improvement implementation and disparities: the case of the health disparities collaboratives.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance.

Authors:  Timothy Jay Carney; Geoffrey P Morgan; Josette Jones; Anna M McDaniel; Michael T Weaver; Bryan Weiner; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Translating evidence-based falls prevention into clinical practice in nursing facilities: Results and lessons from a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Anna Schenck; Joel Gorospe; Jill McArdle; Lee Dobson; Cindy Deporter; Eleanor McConnell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.

Authors:  F Davidoff; P Batalden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

7.  If you've seen one quality improvement collaborative ...

Authors:  Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Impact of health care initiatives on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  M Moscucci; D Share
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  A human factors systems approach to understanding team-based primary care: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Marlon P Mundt; Matthew P Swedlund
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  The role of consultation calls for clinic supervisors in supporting large-scale dissemination of evidence-based treatments for children.

Authors:  Erum Nadeem; Alissa Gleacher; Sandra Pimentel; Laura Campbell Hill; Mary McHugh; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.