L A Jibb1, D Stacey1,2, M Carley2, A Davis3, I D Graham1,2,4, E Green5, L Jolicoeur5, C Kuziemsky6, C Ludwig7, T Truant8. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 2. Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON. 3. Washington State University College of Nursing, Vancouver, WA, U.S.A. 4. Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 5. The Ottawa Hospital, Cancer Program, Ottawa, ON. 6. Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 7. Patient advisor. 8. BC Cancer, Education and Innovation, Vancouver, BC.
Abstract
Introduction: The pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (costars) team is studying how to improve the quality and consistency of cancer symptom management. Methods: A 1-day invitational meeting was held 24 October 2017 in Ottawa, Ontario, to review the current evidence from costars projects and to establish research priorities for a future largescale implementation study. The meeting included 36 participants who were clinicians from adult oncology, pediatric oncology, and homecare; policymakers from national, provincial, and regional organizations; researchers; and a patient. Half the day involved summarizing evidence from four costars studies and experiences with implementing the costars symptom practice guides. The second half of the day used a modified nominal group technique to generate research questions within small groups, presentation of research questions to all participants, and two rounds of voting to reach consensus on research priorities. Results: Participants proposed 4 research categories:■ User-centred augmentation to enhance usability (for example, designing a mobile costars solution)■ Outcome measurement (for example, determining key competencies for clinicians)■ Regular renewal of costars to keep pace with evolving evidence (for example, updates for novel therapies)■ Integration into clinical practice (for example, meaningful engagement of patients and caregivers in study design). Conclusions: Across categories, the top 3 priorities were effect on health services use, competency development, and a mobile costars solution. Future research will address identified priorities, reflecting the needs and perspectives of diverse stakeholders. Stakeholder collaboration will continue to guide our approach to operationalizing this priority research agenda.
Introduction: The pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (costars) team is studying how to improve the quality and consistency of cancer symptom management. Methods: A 1-day invitational meeting was held 24 October 2017 in Ottawa, Ontario, to review the current evidence from costars projects and to establish research priorities for a future largescale implementation study. The meeting included 36 participants who were clinicians from adult oncology, pediatric oncology, and homecare; policymakers from national, provincial, and regional organizations; researchers; and a patient. Half the day involved summarizing evidence from four costars studies and experiences with implementing the costars symptom practice guides. The second half of the day used a modified nominal group technique to generate research questions within small groups, presentation of research questions to all participants, and two rounds of voting to reach consensus on research priorities. Results:Participants proposed 4 research categories:■ User-centred augmentation to enhance usability (for example, designing a mobile costars solution)■ Outcome measurement (for example, determining key competencies for clinicians)■ Regular renewal of costars to keep pace with evolving evidence (for example, updates for novel therapies)■ Integration into clinical practice (for example, meaningful engagement of patients and caregivers in study design). Conclusions: Across categories, the top 3 priorities were effect on health services use, competency development, and a mobile costars solution. Future research will address identified priorities, reflecting the needs and perspectives of diverse stakeholders. Stakeholder collaboration will continue to guide our approach to operationalizing this priority research agenda.
Authors: David A Fedele; Christopher C Cushing; Alyssa Fritz; Christina M Amaro; Adrian Ortega Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Lev D Bubis; Laura Davis; Alyson Mahar; Lisa Barbera; Qing Li; Lesley Moody; Paul Karanicolas; Rinku Sutradhar; Natalie G Coburn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dawn Stacey; Esther Green; Barbara Ballantyne; Joy Tarasuk; Myriam Skrutkowski; Meg Carley; Kim Chapman; Craig Kuziemsky; Erin Kolari; Brenda Sabo; Andréanne Saucier; Tara Shaw; Lucie Tardif; Tracy Truant; Greta G Cummings; Doris Howell Journal: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Hely Shah; Lisa Vandermeer; Fiona MacDonald; Gail Larocque; Shannon Nelson; Mark Clemons; Sharon F McGee Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 3.359