Literature DB >> 26275556

Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study.

Patrick J Worth1, Taranjeet Kaur1, Brian S Diggs1, Brett C Sheppard1, John G Hunter1, James P Dolan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has significant cost impact and is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We undertook a population-based assessment of the national experience with BDI between 2001 and 2011 and compared this to our report for the prior decade.
METHODS: Using the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) for 2001-2011, we identified patients who underwent LC or partial cholecystectomy, with and without biliary reconstruction. Data were analyzed using methods that accounted for the hierarchical, stratified random sampling of the NIS. Both univariate modeling and multivariate modeling were performed.
RESULTS: LCs increased from 71.1 % in 2001 to 79.0 % in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Annual mortality decreased from 0.56 to 0.38 % (p = 0.002). In 2001, 0.11 % of LCs were associated with biliary reconstruction versus 0.09 % in 2011 (p = 0.15) with rates ranging from 0.08 to 0.12 %. The need for reconstruction was associated with an average in-hospital mortality rate of 4.4 %. Mortality rates from LC remained consistent across the study period (average mortality, 0.10 %, p = 0.57). Under multivariate analysis, admission to rural or urban non-teaching centers was associated with a decreased rate of injury; the majority of major BDIs were admitted from clinic or outpatient settings. These results are consistent with results from the prior decade. Neither emergent admission nor race was associated with increased odds of BDI, and this differs from our prior analysis.
CONCLUSION: LC continued to increase in utilization between 2001 and 2011. Although rates of BDI have decreased, the need for reconstruction continues to be associated with a significant mortality. In addition, mortality related to biliary reconstruction is also higher than previously published series and may reflect the complexity of managing biliary injury as well as the higher likelihood of these patients having comorbid conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct injury; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275556     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4469-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve?

Authors:  J Calvete; L Sabater; B Camps; A Verdú; A Gomez-Portilla; J Martín; M A Torrico; B Flor; N Cassinello; S Lledó
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Anand Singla; Melissa M Murphy; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Ten-year trend in the national volume of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair.

Authors:  J P Dolan; B S Diggs; B C Sheppard; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

5.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Management and outcome of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from therapeutic endoscopy to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Arno Nordin; Leena Halme; Heikki Mäkisalo; Helena Isoniemi; Krister Höckerstedt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S C Schmidt; J M Langrehr; R E Hintze; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients.

Authors:  J J Roslyn; G S Binns; E F Hughes; K Saunders-Kirkwood; M J Zinner; J A Cates
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Supreet Singh Bindra; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  9 in total

1.  An observational study of the timing of surgery, use of laparoscopy and outcomes for acute cholecystitis in the USA and UK.

Authors:  A C Murray; S Markar; H Mackenzie; O Baser; T Wiggins; A Askari; G Hanna; O Faiz; E Mayer; C Bicknell; A Darzi; R P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Intraoperatively unrecognized central bile duct injury : In open converted, laparoscopically begun cholecystectomy].

Authors:  H Dralle; K Kols; A Weimann; A Paul; D P Hoyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shanley B Deal; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Dana Telem; Robert D Fanelli; Marian McDonald; Michael Ujiki; L Michael Brunt; Adnan A Alseidi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Tejender Paul Singh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Simultaneous early surgical repair of post-cholecystectomy major bile duct injury and complex abdominal evisceration: A case report.

Authors:  Alfredo Torretta; Dimana Kaludova; Mayank Roy; Satya Bhattacharya; Roberto Valente
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  Assessing the effect of the critical view of safety criteria on simulated operative decision-making: a pilot study.

Authors:  Adam C Niemann; Niki Matusko; Gurjit Sandhu; Oliver A Varban
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk factors for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Cheng Dong; Xue-Jun Jiang; Xue-Ying Shi; Bing Li; Liang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Surgical management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) related major bile duct injuries; predictors of short-and long-term outcomes in a tertiary Egyptian center- a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emad Hamdy Gad; Eslam Ayoup; Yasmin Kamel; Talat Zakareya; Mohamed Abbasy; Ali Nada; Mohamed Housseni; Mohammed Al-Sayed Abd-Elsamee
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-16

9.  Total Hilar Exposure Maneuver for Repair of Complex Bile Duct Injury.

Authors:  Nan-Ak Wiboonkhwan; Thakerng Pitakteerabundit; Tortrakoon Thongkan
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-09-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.