Literature DB >> 26274820

A Regulatory MDM4 Genetic Variant Locating in the Binding Sequence of Multiple MicroRNAs Contributes to Susceptibility of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Feng Gao1, Xiangyu Xiong2, Wenting Pan2, Xinyu Yang2, Changchun Zhou3, Qipeng Yuan1, Liqing Zhou4, Ming Yang2.   

Abstract

A functional rs4245739 A>C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) locating in the MDM43'-untranslated (3'-UTR) region creates a miR-191-5p or miR-887-3p targeting sites. This change results in decreased expression of oncogene MDM4. Therefore, we examined the association between this SNP and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) risk as well as its regulatory function in SCLC cells. Genotypes were determined in two independent case-control sets consisted of 520SCLC cases and 1040 controls from two regions of China. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression. The impact of the rs4245739 SNP on miR-191-5p/miR-887-3p mediated MDM4 expression regulation was investigated using luciferase reporter gene assays. We found that the MDM4 rs4245739AC and CC genotypes were significantly associated with decreased SCLC susceptibility compared with the AA genotype in both case-control sets (Shandong set: OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32-0.89, P = 0.014; Jiangsu set: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.26-0.879, P = 0.017). Stratified analyses indicated that there was a significantly multiplicative interaction between rs4245739 and smoking (Pinteractioin = 0.048). After co-tranfection of miRNAs and different allelic-MDM4 reporter constructs into SCLC cells, we found that the both miR-191-5p and miR-887-3p can lead to significantly decreased MDM4 expression activities in the construct with C-allelic 3'-UTR but not A-allelic 3'-UTR, suggesting a consistent genotype-phenotype correlation. Our data illuminate that the MDM4rs4245739SNP contributes to SCLC risk and support the notion that gene 3'-UTR genetic variants, impacting miRNA-binding, might modify SCLC susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26274820      PMCID: PMC4537101          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading causes of cancer death in the world, with more than1,000,000 deaths per year [1]. Lung cancer is commonly classified as small-cell lung cancer(SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Though accounting for only approximately twenty percent of all lung cancer cases, SCLC is much more aggressive compared to NSCLC [2,3]. As a malignancy with poor prognosis, SCLC shows high growth fraction, rapid doubling time, and early development of widespread metastases [2,3]. When diagnosed, most SCLC patients have metastasis and bad prognosis if left untreated [3]. Accumulated epidemiological evidences indicate that heavy tobacco smoking is a main environmental risk-factor of this disease [2,3]. Recent progresses on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed that multiple novel genetic variations are associated with lung cancer susceptibility [4-12]. However, most studies examined both lung cancer subtypes or only focused on NSCLC. Interestingly, the majority of identified risk loci do not significantly influence the risk of lung cancer differentially by histology, indicating that there might be different genetic makeup impacts risk of SCLC or NSCLC [4-12]. Therefore, discovery of novel SCLC-risk-associated SNPs might be a potentially valuable path towards illuminating etiology of SCLC. MDM4, also known as MDMX or HDMX, is a structurally homologous protein of MDM2. MDM4 shares an NH2-terminal P53-binding domain with MDM2 and can inhibit activities of P53 in various malignancies [13-17]. As the guardian of human genome, P53 functions at the center of a complex molecular network to mediate tumor suppression. As a well-known oncogene, overexpressed MDM4 in human tumors including lung cancer led to depressed P53 activities and, thus, tumorigenesis. In line with this, mouse model with overexpressed MDM4 via transgenetic technology showed spontaneous carcinogenesis during their lifespan [18]. There is an MDM43’-untranslatedregion (3’-UTR) rs4245739A>C SNP locating in the target binding site for two miRNAs (miR-191-5p and miR-887-3p) [19,20]. miR-191-5p and miR-887-3p could selectively bind to MDM43’-UTR with the rs4245739C allele but not 3’-UTR with the A allele. This allelic miRNAs’ binding leads to elevated expression levels of MDM4 mRNA and/or protein among rs4245739A allele carriers with cancers [19-22]. Two GWAS showed that the MDM4 rs4245739 A-allele is significantly associated with increased risk of both prostate cancer and breast cancer [23,24]. Several case-control studies using candidate gene strategy also confirmed the positive association between this polymorphism and susceptibility of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in different ethnic populations [20,22,25,26]. However, the involvement of this functional SNP in SCLC is still largely unknown. Considering the essential role of MDM4 in carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that the MDM4rs4245739 SNP may contribute to SCLC susceptibility via allelic regulation ofmiR-191-5p and/or miR-887-3p binding affinity and, thus, MDM4 expression. In the current study, we conducted a two-stage case-control study of SCLC recruited from Jinan city (Shandong Province, China) and Huaian city (Jiangsu Province, China). Furthermore, to validate the biological function of this polymorphism, we investigated the allelic regulation of miR-191-5p and miR-887-3p on MDM4 in SCLC cells.

Materials and Methods

Study subjects

This study consisted of two case-control sets: (i) Shandong case-control set: 320 SCLC patients from Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, Shandong Province, China) and sex- and age-matched (±5 years) 640 controls. Patients were recruited between June 2009 and November 2014 at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Control subjects were randomly selected from a pool of 4500 individuals from a community cancer-screening program for early detection of cancer conducted in Jinan city as described in detail previously [22]. (ii) Jiangsu case-control set: 200 SCLC patients from Huaian No. 2 Hospital (Huaian, Jiangsu Province, China) and sex- and age-matched 400 controls. Patients were consecutively recruited between January 2009 and January 2015 at Huaian No. 2 Hospital. Controls were cancer-free individuals selected from a community cancer-screening program (3600 individuals) for early detection of cancer conducted in Huaian city as described in detail previously [22]. Individuals who smoked one cigarette per day for over 1 year were considered as smokers [22]. All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Huaian No. 2 Hospital and Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject at recruitment.

SNP genotyping

PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was utilized to determine MDM4 rs4245739A>C genotypes as described in detail previously [22,25,26]. In brief, the primers used for amplifying DNA segments with the rs4245739 site (the mismatch base is underlined) were 5′-AAGACTAAAGAAGGCTGGGG-3′ and 5′-TTCAAATAATGTGGTAAGTGACC-3′. Restriction enzyme MspI (New England Biolabs) was used to digest the PCR products and distinguish the rs4245739 genotypes. A 10% random sample was reciprocally examined by different person, and the reproducibility was 98.7%. Additionally, a 5% random samples were also tested via Sanger sequencing, and the reproducibility was 100%.

Plasmid construction

The MDM4 rs4245739A and rs4245739C allelic reporter constructs were prepared by amplifying part of the MDM43’-UTR region from subjects homozygous for the rs4245739AA or rs4245739CC genotype. The PCR primers used were as follows: 5′-AACTCTAGAGGTAGTACGAACATAAAAATGC-3′ and 5′-AACTCTAGACTGCATAAAGTAATCCATGG-3′, which includes the Xba I restriction site (underlined sequences). The PCR products were digested with Xba I (New England Biolabs) and ligated, respectively, into an appropriately digested pGL3-control vector (Promega). The constructs were designated aspGL3-rs4245739A and pGL3b-rs4245739C, respectively. The inserts were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Dual luciferase reporter gene assay

A firefly luciferase reporter plasmid (pGL3-control, pGL3-rs4245739A or pGL3-rs4245739C), a renilla luciferase vector (pRL-SV40, Promega) plus 30 nMsmall RNAs (miR-191-5p mimics, miR-887-3p mimics or negative control RNAs) (Genepharma, Guangzhou, China) were co-transfected into SCLCH446 cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Luciferase activity was determined at 48h after transfection using a luciferase assay system (Promega) as previously described [27-29]. Three independent transfection experiments were performed and each was done in triplicate. Fold increase was calculated by defining the activity of empty pGL3-control vector as 1.

Statistical analyses

As described in detail previously [22, 30–32], the differences in demographic variables and genotype distributions of MDM4 rs4245739 SNP between SCLC cases and controls were calculated using Pearson’s χ2 test. Associations between MDM4 rs4245739 genotypes and SCLC risk were estimated by odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using unconditional logistic regression model. All ORs were adjusted for age, sex and smoking status, where it was appropriate. We tested the null hypotheses of multiplicative gene-covariate interaction and evaluated departures from multiplicative interaction models by including main effect variables and their product terms in the logistic regression model [30-32]. A P value of less than 0.05 was used as the criterion of statistical significance, and all statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were performed with SPSS software package (Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Allelic frequencies and genotype distributions of MDM4 rs4245739SNP

The median age was 57 years (range, 25–82 years for Shandong set; range, 23–79 years for Jiangsu set) for the patients and 57 years (range, 19–80 years for Shandong set; range, 20–81 years for Jiangsu set) for the controls(Shandong set: P = 0.615; Jiangsu set: P = 1.000). There was no significant difference between cases and controls in sex distribution (Shandong set: 78.4% males incases vs. 76.4% in controls; P = 0.480; Jiangsu set: 74.0% males incases vs. 71.3% in controls; P = 0.479). This indicates that the frequency matching was adequate (Table 1). However, more smokers among SCLC patients were found in Shandong case-control set compared with control subjects (Shandong set: 77.8% vs. 34.2%, P<0.001). Similarly, there are more SCLC patients who smoking than controls in Jiangsu set (78.5% vs. 21.5%, P<0.001). Additionally, more patients with limited disease were observed than among ones with extensive disease in two sets (Shandong set: 56.9% vs. 43.1%; Jiangsu set: 56.5% vs. 43.5%).
Table 1

Distribution of selected characteristics among SCLC cases and controls.

VariableShandong setJiangsu set
CasesControls P a CasesControls P a
n (%) n (%) n (%) n(%)
320640200400
Age (year) b 0.6151.000
 ≤57156(48.9)301(47.0)99(49.5)198(49.5)
 >57164(51.2)339(53.0)101(50.5)202(50.5)
Sex0.4800.479
 Male251(78.4)489(76.4)148(74.0)285(71.3)
 Female69(21.6)151(23.6)52(26.0)115(28.7)
Smoking status<0.001<0.001
 Yes249(77.8)219(34.2)157(78.5)113(28.3)
 No71(22.2)421(65.8)43(21.5)287(71.8)
Clinical stage c
 Limited182(56.9)113(56.5)
 Extensive138(43.1)87(43.5)

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

aTwo-sided χ2 test.

bMedian ages of patients for Shandong set and Jiangsu set are 57 years.

cClassified according to the Veterans’ Administration Lung Study Group.

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer. aTwo-sided χ2 test. bMedian ages of patients for Shandong set and Jiangsu set are 57 years. cClassified according to the Veterans’ Administration Lung Study Group. As shown in Table 2, the frequency for the MDM4 rs4245739 C allele was 0.038 and 0.073among SCLC patients and healthy controls from Shandong set, and 0.043 and 0.101 from Jiangsu set. All observed genotype frequencies in both SCLC cases and controls conform to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Distributions of these MDM4 genotypes were then compared among SCLC cases and controls. The frequencies of MDM4 rs4245739 AA and AC or CC genotypes among patients were significantly different from those among controls in Shandong set (χ2 = 10.70, P = 0.005, df = 2) (Table 2). Similarly, the frequencies of MDM4 rs4245739 AA and AC or CC genotypes among cases were significantly different from those among control subjects in Jiangsu set (χ2 = 12.84, P = 0.002, df = 2) (Table 2).
Table 2

Genotype frequencies of MDM4rs4245739A>C polymorphism among patients and controls and their association with SCLC risk.

Genotypes MDM4 rs4245739A>C
Cases, n (%)Controls, n (%)OR a (95% CI) P
Shandong set n = 320 n = 640
AA297(92.6)548(85.6)Reference
AC22(7.1)90(14.1)0.52(0.31–0.87)0.013
CC1(0.3)2(0.3)NCNC
AC+CC23(7.4)92(14.4)0.53(0.32–0.89)0.014
Jiangsu set n = 200 n = 400
AA183(91.5)321(80.3)Reference
AC17(8.5)77(19.3)0.48(0.26–0.88)0.019
CC0(0)2(0.4)NCNC
AC+CC17(8.5)79(19.7)0.47(0.26–0.87)0.017
Total n = 520 n = 1040
AA480(92.3)869(83.6)Reference
AC39(7.5)167(16.1)0.49(0.32–0.75)0.001
CC1(0.2)4(0.4)NCNC
AC+CC40(7.7)171(16.5)0.50(0.32–0.76)0.001

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NC, not calculated; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

aData were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status.

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NC, not calculated; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. aData were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status.

Association between MDM4 rs4245739SNP and SCLC risk

Associations between genotypes of MDM4 rs4245739 A>C polymorphism and SCLC risk were calculated using unconditional logistic regression analyses (Table 2). As shown in Table 2, the MDM4 rs4245739 C allele acts as a protective allele of SCLC. Subjects with the AC genotype had an OR of 0.52 (95% CI = 0.31–0.87, P = 0.013) for developing SCLC, compared with subjects with the AA genotype. Significantly decreased SCLC risk was also observed among rs4245739 AC or CC carriers compared to the AA carriers (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32–0.89, P = 0.014). The associations of SCLC risk with the MDM4 rs4245739SNP were further validated in an independent Jiangsu case-control set. A significantly decreased SCLC risk was also associated with rs4245739 (AC: OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.26–0.88, P = 0.019;AC or CC: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.26–0.87, P = 0.017). In the pooled analyses, we found that the rs4245739 AC genotype had a 0.49-folddecreased risk for SCLC compared with the AA genotype (95% CI = 0.32–0.75, P = 0.001), and the rs4245739 AC or CC genotype had a 0.50-folddecreased risk compared with the AA genotype (95% CI = 0.32–0.76, P = 0.001) (Table 2). All ORs were adjusted for sex, age and smoking status. We further examined the SCLC risk associated with the MDM4rs4245739genotypes by stratifying for age, sex, smoking status and disease stage using the pooled data of two Chinese case-control sets (Table 3). In stratified analyses with age, rs4245739AC and CC genotypes were significantly associated with decreased risk in subjects aged 57 years or younger (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.21–0.74, P = 0.003), but not in subjects aged older than 57 years (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.35–1.15, P = 0.134). There was no significant gene-age interaction (P interaction = 0.274). A significantly decreased risk of SCLC was associated with AC and CC genotypes only among females (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.15–0.74, P = 0.007), but not among males (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.38–1.06, P = 0.083), compared with the MDM4rs4245739 AA genotype. No significant gene-sex interaction was observed (P interaction = 0.135). We did not find significantly decreased risk (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.42–1.28, P = 0.274) for the carriers with AC and CC genotypes compared with individuals with the AA genotype in smokers. However, thers4245739AC and CC genotypes did show a 0.30-fold decreased risk to develop SCLC (95% CI = 0.14–0.64, P = 0.002) compared with the AA genotype in nonsmokers. A multiplicative gene—smoking interaction existed (P interactioin = 0.048). Associations between rs4245739 AC and CC genotypes and SCLC risk were observed in both patients with the limited stage disease (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.32–0.84, P = 0.008) or the extensive stage disease (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.24–0.97, P = 0.040) (Table 3).
Table 3

Association between MDM4rs4245739A>C variant andSCLC risk stratified by selected variables.

Variable MDM4 rs4245739A>C P interaction c
AA a AC+CC a OR b (95% CI) P
Age (year)0.274
 ≤57237/39618/1030.40(0.21–0.74)0.003
 >57243/47322/680.63(0.35–1.15)0.134
P heterogeneity 0.1800.079
Sex0.135
 Male369/68430/900.63(0.38–1.06)0.083
 Female111/18510/810.33(0.15–0.74)0.007
P heterogeneity 0.4350.010
Smoking status0.048
 Nonsmoker105/5729/1360.30(0.14–0.64)0.002
 Smoker375/29731/350.73(0.42–1.28)0.274
P heterogeneity <0.001<0.001
StageNC
 Limited270/86925/1710.52(0.32–0.84)0.008
 Extensive210/86915/1710.48(0.24–0.97)0.040
P heterogeneity 0.0150.135

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated.

aNumber of case patients with genotype/number of control subjects with genotype.

bData were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status, where it was appropriate.

c P values for gene-environment interaction were calculated using the multiplicative interaction term in SPSS software.

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculated. aNumber of case patients with genotype/number of control subjects with genotype. bData were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status, where it was appropriate. c P values for gene-environment interaction were calculated using the multiplicative interaction term in SPSS software.

Functional relevance ofrs4245739 on miRNA-mediated MDM4 regulation

SNPrs4245739A>C could lead to higher affinity between miR-191-5p/miR-887-3p and MDM4mRNA and decreased MDM4expression in multiple malignancies [19-22]. However, its impacts on MDM4 regulation in SCLC are still unclear. As a result, we examined whether there is an allele-specific effect of rs4245739polymorphismon MDM4 expression in SCLC cells by miR-191-5p and miR-887-3p. Relative luciferase expression assays indicated that miR-191-5p can significant lower luciferase activities in SCLC H446 cells transfected with rs4245739C allelic reporter constructs compared to negative control RNAs(P = 0.003) (Fig 1). Similarly, miR-887-3p also regulates MDM4 3’-UTR region with significantly lower luciferase activities in H446 cells expressing rs4245739C allelic constructs compared to negative control RNAs (P = 0.014) (Fig 1). However, there was no such depression in H446 cells with transfection of rs4245739A allelic reporter constructs by both miRNAs mimics (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Transient luciferase reporter gene expression assays with constructs containing different alleles of MDM4 3’-UTR region in SCLC H446 cells.

H446 cells were cotransfected with pRL-SV40 to standardize transfection efficiency. Fold increase was measured by defining the activity of cells co-transfected with both pGL3-rs4245739A or pGL3-rs4245739Creporter construct and NC-RNAs as 1. All experiments were performed in triplicates at least in three independent transfection experiments and each value represents mean ± SD. *P<0.05compared with each of the luciferase construct by t-tests. NC-RNA, negative control RNAs; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Transient luciferase reporter gene expression assays with constructs containing different alleles of MDM4 3’-UTR region in SCLC H446 cells.

H446 cells were cotransfected with pRL-SV40 to standardize transfection efficiency. Fold increase was measured by defining the activity of cells co-transfected with both pGL3-rs4245739A or pGL3-rs4245739Creporter construct and NC-RNAs as 1. All experiments were performed in triplicates at least in three independent transfection experiments and each value represents mean ± SD. *P<0.05compared with each of the luciferase construct by t-tests. NC-RNA, negative control RNAs; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the association between the MDM4 rs4245739 functional SNP and SCLC risk via a case-control approach. We observed that individuals with MDM4 rs4245739 AC or CC genotypes show significantly decreased SCLC risk compared with the AA genotype carriers. To reveal miR-191-5p/miR-887-3p mediated allelic-regulation by this SNP, we examined luciferase activities in SCLC cells transfected with different allelic reporter constructs. The genotype-phenotype correlation analyses indicated that both miRNAs could inhibit MDM4 expression only in SCLC cells with C-allele constructs expression but not A-allele constructs. These results highlight the involvement of functional genetic variants in miRNA-binding sites in SCLC etiology. Accumulated evidences demonstrated that genetic makeup might have direct contribution of to SCLC risk [33-35]. Interestingly, referring to the databases of gene expression profile to identify genes that are deregulated in SCLC and their SNPs in the 3’-UTR, Xiong et al identified a SCLC susceptibility SNP rs3134615 G>T can inhibit the interaction of miR-1827 with MYCL1 3’-UTR, resulting in higher constitutive expression of MYCL1 [35]. Consistent with this notion, we also found a MDM43’-UTR SNP targeted by miRNAs is associated with SCLC susceptibility. The MDM4rs4245739 polymorphism showed a consistent association with SCLC risk intwo independent case-control sets, which are unlikely to be attributable to unknown confounding factors due to having significantly increased odd ratios with small P values. In addition, the genotype-phenotype relationship between the rs4245739 polymorphism and reporter gene expression supports our conclusion. Moreover, the MDM4rs4245739 SNP might be a common genetic risk component for different cancers, which has been proved by our group and others via either candidate gene approach or GWAS [19-26]. For example,we previously found that rs4245739 AC and CC genotypes were significantly associated with decreased risk of esophageal cancer [22], a malignancy with similar environmental etiology of SCLC (i.e. heavy smoking). However, there might be several limitations in the current case-control study. For instance, since all SCLC cases were recruited from the hospital, inherent selection bias may exist. Therefore, the findings of our study warrant to be validated in a population-based prospective study in the future. Relatively small sample size for non-smokers should be further analyzed in a larger population. In summary, our results suggested that functional MDM4 rs4245739 SNP was associated with a significantly decreased SCLC risk in Chinese Han populations. The associations between SNPs and SCLC risk are remarkable in nonsmokers. Given this fact, further efforts are needed to examine whether MDM4 rs4245739 genetic polymorphism can be used as a potential diagnostic marker of SCLC.
  35 in total

1.  MdmX inhibits Smad transactivation.

Authors:  Madhavi Kadakia; Thomas L Brown; Molly M McGorry; Steven J Berberich
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Leukocyte telomere length-related genetic variants in 1p34.2 and 14q21 loci contribute to the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Juan Shi; Fang Sun; Li Peng; Bo Li; Li Liu; Changchun Zhou; Jianjun Han; Li Zhang; Liqing Zhou; Xiaojiao Zhang; Honglei Pu; Lei Tong; Qipeng Yuan; Xianrang Song; Ming Yang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies new lung cancer susceptibility loci in never-smoking women in Asia.

Authors:  Qing Lan; Chao A Hsiung; Keitaro Matsuo; Yun-Chul Hong; Adeline Seow; Zhaoming Wang; H Dean Hosgood; Kexin Chen; Jiu-Cun Wang; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Wei Hu; Maria Pik Wong; Wei Zheng; Neil Caporaso; Jae Yong Park; Chien-Jen Chen; Yeul Hong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Maria Teresa Landi; Hongbing Shen; Charles Lawrence; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Jeffrey Yuenger; Kevin B Jacobs; I-Shou Chang; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Hee Nam Kim; Gee-Chen Chang; Bryan A Bassig; Margaret Tucker; Fusheng Wei; Zhihua Yin; Chen Wu; She-Juan An; Biyun Qian; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Daru Lu; Jianjun Liu; Hyo-Sung Jeon; Chin-Fu Hsiao; Jae Sook Sung; Jin Hee Kim; Yu-Tang Gao; Ying-Huang Tsai; Yoo Jin Jung; Huan Guo; Zhibin Hu; Amy Hutchinson; Wen-Chang Wang; Robert Klein; Charles C Chung; In-Jae Oh; Kuan-Yu Chen; Sonja I Berndt; Xingzhou He; Wei Wu; Jiang Chang; Xu-Chao Zhang; Ming-Shyan Huang; Hong Zheng; Junwen Wang; Xueying Zhao; Yuqing Li; Jin Eun Choi; Wu-Chou Su; Kyong Hwa Park; Sook Whan Sung; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yuh-Min Chen; Li Liu; Chang Hyun Kang; Lingmin Hu; Chung-Hsing Chen; William Pao; Young-Chul Kim; Tsung-Ying Yang; Jun Xu; Peng Guan; Wen Tan; Jian Su; Chih-Liang Wang; Haixin Li; Alan Dart Loon Sihoe; Zhenhong Zhao; Ying Chen; Yi Young Choi; Jen-Yu Hung; Jun Suk Kim; Ho-Il Yoon; Qiuyin Cai; Chien-Chung Lin; In Kyu Park; Ping Xu; Jing Dong; Christopher Kim; Qincheng He; Reury-Perng Perng; Takashi Kohno; Sun-Seog Kweon; Chih-Yi Chen; Roel Vermeulen; Junjie Wu; Wei-Yen Lim; Kun-Chieh Chen; Wong-Ho Chow; Bu-Tian Ji; John K C Chan; Minjie Chu; Yao-Jen Li; Jun Yokota; Jihua Li; Hongyan Chen; Yong-Bing Xiang; Chong-Jen Yu; Hideo Kunitoh; Guoping Wu; Li Jin; Yen-Li Lo; Kouya Shiraishi; Ying-Hsiang Chen; Hsien-Chih Lin; Tangchun Wu; Yi-Long Wu; Pan-Chyr Yang; Baosen Zhou; Min-Ho Shin; Joseph F Fraumeni; Dongxin Lin; Stephen J Chanock; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Myeloperoxidase (MPO) genotype and lung cancer histologic types: the MPO -463 A allele is associated with reduced risk for small cell lung cancer in smokers.

Authors:  Heike Dally; Kai Gassner; Birgit Jäger; Peter Schmezer; Bertold Spiegelhalder; Lutz Edler; Peter Drings; Hendrik Dienemann; Volker Schulz; Klaus Kayser; Helmut Bartsch; Angela Risch
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Functional MDM4 rs4245739 genetic variant, alone and in combination with P53 Arg72Pro polymorphism, contributes to breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Jibing Liu; Xiaohu Tang; Meng Li; Chao Lu; Juan Shi; Liqing Zhou; Qipeng Yuan; Ming Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A functional BRCA1 coding sequence genetic variant contributes to risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Zhang; Jinyu Wei; Liqing Zhou; Changchun Zhou; Juan Shi; Qipeng Yuan; Ming Yang; Dongxin Lin
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  A genetic variant of MDM4 influences regulation by multiple microRNAs in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shane Stegeman; Leire Moya; Luke A Selth; Amanda B Spurdle; Judith A Clements; Jyotsna Batra
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 8.  Small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  George R Simon; Henry Wagner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array.

Authors:  Rosalind A Eeles; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch; Edward J Saunders; Daniel A Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Maya Ghoussaini; Craig Luccarini; Joe Dennis; Sarah Jugurnauth-Little; Tokhir Dadaev; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; Ken Muir; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Fredrik Wiklund; Henrik Gronberg; Christopher A Haiman; Fredrick Schumacher; Brian E Henderson; Loic Le Marchand; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; David J Hunter; Susan Gapstur; Stephen J Chanock; Sonja I Berndt; Demetrius Albanes; Gerald Andriole; Johanna Schleutker; Maren Weischer; Federico Canzian; Elio Riboli; Tim J Key; Ruth C Travis; Daniele Campa; Sue A Ingles; Esther M John; Richard B Hayes; Paul D P Pharoah; Nora Pashayan; Kay-Tee Khaw; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; Lisa B Signorello; Stephen N Thibodeau; Dan Schaid; Christiane Maier; Walther Vogel; Adam S Kibel; Cezary Cybulski; Jan Lubinski; Lisa Cannon-Albright; Hermann Brenner; Jong Y Park; Radka Kaneva; Jyotsna Batra; Amanda B Spurdle; Judith A Clements; Manuel R Teixeira; Ed Dicks; Andrew Lee; Alison M Dunning; Caroline Baynes; Don Conroy; Melanie J Maranian; Shahana Ahmed; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Emma J Sawyer; Angela Morgan; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Vincent S Khoo; Christopher C Parker; Nicholas J Van As; Christopher J Woodhouse; Alan Thompson; Tim Dudderidge; Chris Ogden; Colin S Cooper; Artitaya Lophatananon; Angela Cox; Melissa C Southey; John L Hopper; Dallas R English; Markus Aly; Jan Adolfsson; Jiangfeng Xu; Siqun L Zheng; Meredith Yeager; Rudolf Kaaks; W Ryan Diver; Mia M Gaudet; Mariana C Stern; Roman Corral; Amit D Joshi; Ahva Shahabi; Tiina Wahlfors; Teuvo L J Tammela; Anssi Auvinen; Jarmo Virtamo; Peter Klarskov; Børge G Nordestgaard; M Andreas Røder; Sune F Nielsen; Stig E Bojesen; Afshan Siddiq; Liesel M Fitzgerald; Suzanne Kolb; Erika M Kwon; Danielle M Karyadi; William J Blot; Wei Zheng; Qiuyin Cai; Shannon K McDonnell; Antje E Rinckleb; Bettina Drake; Graham Colditz; Dominika Wokolorczyk; Robert A Stephenson; Craig Teerlink; Heiko Muller; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Thomas A Sellers; Hui-Yi Lin; Chavdar Slavov; Vanio Mitev; Felicity Lose; Srilakshmi Srinivasan; Sofia Maia; Paula Paulo; Ethan Lange; Kathleen A Cooney; Antonis C Antoniou; Daniel Vincent; François Bacot; Daniel C Tessier; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Association of a genetic variation in a miR-191 binding site in MDM4 with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Liqing Zhou; Xiaojiao Zhang; Ziqiang Li; Changchun Zhou; Meng Li; Xiaohu Tang; Chao Lu; Helou Li; Qipeng Yuan; Ming Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Association of KLK3, VAMP8 and MDM4 Genetic Variants within microRNA Binding Sites with Prostate Cancer: Evidence from Serbian Population.

Authors:  Nevena Kotarac; Zorana Dobrijevic; Suzana Matijasevic; Dusanka Savic-Pavicevic; Goran Brajuskovic
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Circulating miRNA 887 is differentially expressed in ARDS and modulates endothelial function.

Authors:  Andrew J Goodwin; Pengfei Li; Perry V Halushka; James A Cook; Aman S Sumal; Hongkuan Fan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 3.  Levels of MicroRNA Heterogeneity in Cancer Biology.

Authors:  Nina Petrovic; Sercan Ergün; Esma R Isenovic
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Expression profiling of microRNAs in human bone tissue from postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Laura De-Ugarte; Jenny Serra-Vinardell; Lara Nonell; Susana Balcells; Magdalena Arnal; Xavier Nogues; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Daniel Grinberg; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Natalia Garcia-Giralt
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 5.  MDM4 alternative splicing and implication in MDM4 targeted cancer therapies.

Authors:  Jin Wu; Guanting Lu; Xinjiang Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 6.  SNPs in microRNA target sites and their potential role in human disease.

Authors:  Adrianna Moszyńska; Magdalena Gebert; James F Collawn; Rafał Bartoszewski
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.411

7.  A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of MDM4 genetic variants and cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Yajing Zhai; Zhijun Dai; Hairong He; Fan Gao; Lihong Yang; Yalin Dong; Jun Lu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08

8.  Profile of the breast cancer susceptibility marker rs4245739 identifies a role for miRNAs.

Authors:  Sumadi Lukman Anwar; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Johnathan Watkins
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.248

9.  Genetic variation at the microRNA binding site of CAV1 gene is associated with lung cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Xue Fang; Xuelian Li; Zhihua Yin; Lingzi Xia; Xiaowei Quan; Yuxia Zhao; Baosen Zhou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-09

10.  Variations within 3'-UTR of MDM4 gene contribute to clinical outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients following platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Wen Gao; Xi Ding; Wen Xu; Di Liu; Bo Su; Yifeng Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.