R W Trickett1, S Rahman1, P Page1,2, I Pallister1,2. 1. Morriston Hospital, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board , UK. 2. College of Medicine, Swansea University , UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb published by the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic surgeons (BAPRAS) and British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) were introduced to improve the treatment received by patients after open injury to the lower limb. These Standards were released after BAPRAS/BOA published Guidelines for the management of open tibial fractures. METHODS: We wished to determine the impact of these Standards upon the surgical management of open tibial fractures by comparing patients admitted to an orthoplastic centre in the 45 months concluding December 2009 (the Guidelines era) with those admitted during 2011 (the Standards era). Surgical procedures required during the first 30 days and 12 months after injury were determined. Cases were divided into 'directly admitted patients' (DAP) and 'transferred patients' (TP). Standards-era patients were divided further into those who had surgery exclusively at the orthoplastic centre (orthoplastic patients (OPP)) and those transferred after surgery (TASP). RESULTS: The number of TP trebled in frequency in the Standards era, 25% of whom were transferred before surgery. Significantly fewer surgical procedures were required for DAP and OPP groups compared with TP (and TASP) groups in both eras (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.05). DAP and OPP groups during the Standards era underwent the fewest procedures, with the vast majority of cases treated with two or fewer procedures in the first 12 months (88% and 80%, respectively, compared with 61% in the Guidelines era). In the Guidelines era, 44% of TP cases and in the Standards era 39% of TP and 29% of TASP groups underwent two or fewer procedures. Approximately two-thirds of open tibial fractures managed in our orthoplastic centre were patients transferred after surgery. The greatest impact of the Standards was evident for those who underwent surgery exclusively in the orthoplastic centre, reflecting a more deliberate combined strategy. CONCLUSION: These findings vindicate the Standards as well as mandating reorganisation and resourcing of orthoplastic services to ensure immediate transfer and early combined surgery. By increasing the capacity to deal with time-dependent initial surgery, the surgical burden that the patient must endure, and which the service must provide, are reduced.
INTRODUCTION: The standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb published by the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic surgeons (BAPRAS) and British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) were introduced to improve the treatment received by patients after open injury to the lower limb. These Standards were released after BAPRAS/BOA published Guidelines for the management of open tibial fractures. METHODS: We wished to determine the impact of these Standards upon the surgical management of open tibial fractures by comparing patients admitted to an orthoplastic centre in the 45 months concluding December 2009 (the Guidelines era) with those admitted during 2011 (the Standards era). Surgical procedures required during the first 30 days and 12 months after injury were determined. Cases were divided into 'directly admitted patients' (DAP) and 'transferred patients' (TP). Standards-era patients were divided further into those who had surgery exclusively at the orthoplastic centre (orthoplastic patients (OPP)) and those transferred after surgery (TASP). RESULTS: The number of TP trebled in frequency in the Standards era, 25% of whom were transferred before surgery. Significantly fewer surgical procedures were required for DAP and OPP groups compared with TP (and TASP) groups in both eras (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.05). DAP and OPP groups during the Standards era underwent the fewest procedures, with the vast majority of cases treated with two or fewer procedures in the first 12 months (88% and 80%, respectively, compared with 61% in the Guidelines era). In the Guidelines era, 44% of TP cases and in the Standards era 39% of TP and 29% of TASP groups underwent two or fewer procedures. Approximately two-thirds of open tibial fractures managed in our orthoplastic centre were patients transferred after surgery. The greatest impact of the Standards was evident for those who underwent surgery exclusively in the orthoplastic centre, reflecting a more deliberate combined strategy. CONCLUSION: These findings vindicate the Standards as well as mandating reorganisation and resourcing of orthoplastic services to ensure immediate transfer and early combined surgery. By increasing the capacity to deal with time-dependent initial surgery, the surgical burden that the patient must endure, and which the service must provide, are reduced.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hot transfer; Open fracture; Open tibial fracture; Orthoplastic
Authors: Piers R J Page; Ryan W Trickett; Shakeel M Rahman; Angharad Walters; Leila M Pinder; Caroline J Brooks; Hayley Hutchings; Ian Pallister Journal: Injury Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: K Oflazoglu; J M Hoogendoorn; P van der Zwaal; E T Walbeehm; W A van Enst; H R Holtslag; D Hofstee; P Plantinga; M Elzinga; H Rakhorst Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Alexander Thomas Schade; Master Yesaya; Jeremy Bates; Claude Martin; William James Harrison Journal: Malawi Med J Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 0.875
Authors: Kevin M Klifto; Saïd C Azoury; Sammy Othman; Christopher S Klifto; L Scott Levin; Stephen J Kovach Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-03-22
Authors: Alexander Thomas Schade; Foster Mbowuwa; Paul Chidothi; Peter MacPherson; Simon Matthew Graham; Claude Martin; William James Harrison; Linda Chokotho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240