Literature DB >> 25916805

The use of secure anonymised data linkage to determine changes in healthcare utilisation following severe open tibial fractures.

Piers R J Page1, Ryan W Trickett2, Shakeel M Rahman3, Angharad Walters4, Leila M Pinder5, Caroline J Brooks6, Hayley Hutchings7, Ian Pallister8.   

Abstract

Severe open fractures of the lower limbs are complex injuries requiring expert multidisciplinary management in appropriate orthoplastic centres. This study aimed to assess the impact of open fractures on healthcare utilisation and test the null hypotheses that there is no difference in healthcare utilisation between the year before and year after injury, and that there is no difference in healthcare utilisation in the year post-injury between patients admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre in keeping with the joint BOA/BAPRAS standards and those having initial surgery elsewhere. This retrospective cohort study utilising secure anonymised information linkage (SAIL), a novel databank of anonymised nationally pooled health records, recruited patients over 18 years of age sustaining severe open lower limb fractures managed primarily or secondarily at our centre and who had data available in the SAIL databank. 101 patients met inclusion criteria and 90 of these had records in the SAIL databank. The number of days in hospital, number of primary care attendances, number of outpatient attendances and number of emergency department attendances in the years prior and subsequent to injury were recorded. Patients sustaining open fractures had significantly different healthcare utilisation in the year after injury when compared with the year before, in terms of days spent in hospital (23.42 vs. 1.70, p=0.000), outpatient attendances (11.98 vs. 1.05, p=0.000), primary care attendances (29.48 vs. 11.99, p=0.000) and emergency department presentations (0.2 vs. 0.01, p=0.025). Patients admitted directly to orthoplastic centres had significantly fewer operations (1.78 vs. 3.31) and GP attendances (23.6 vs. 33.52) than those transferred in subsequent to initial management in other units. There is a significant increase in healthcare utilisation after open tibial fracture. Adherence to national standards minimises the impact of this on both patients and health services.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Limb reconstruction; Open fracture; Orthoplastic; Trauma network

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916805     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  4 in total

1.  From guidelines to standards of care for open tibial fractures.

Authors:  R W Trickett; S Rahman; P Page; I Pallister
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  [Trifocal bone transport by using monolateral rail system in treatment of bone defects caused by post-traumatic tibial osteomyelitis].

Authors:  Peng Ren; Chuang Ma
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-15

3.  Protocol for a prospective cohort study of open tibia fractures in Malawi with a nested implementation of open fracture guidelines.

Authors:  Alexander Thomas Schade; Nohakhelha Nyamulani; Leonard Ngoe Banza; Andrew John Metcalfe; Andrew Leather; Jason J Madan; David G Lallloo; Williams James Harrison; Peter MacPherson
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-09-13

4.  Economics of open tibial fractures: the pivotal role of length-of-stay and infection.

Authors:  Harm Hoekstra; Bart Smeets; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Anne-Cécile Spitz; Stefaan Nijs
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-09-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.