Literature DB >> 16950263

A philosophy of care of open injuries based on the Ganga hospital score.

S Rajasekaran1, S Raja Sabapathy.   

Abstract

In the management of Type IIIb injuries, Gustilo's classification has the disadvantages of a poor intra and inter-observer agreement rate, low specificity and sensitivity to salvage and inability to predict functional outcomes. We propose here a validated score which assesses the severity of injury to the covering structures, skeletal structures and functional tissues of the injured limb separately along with providing weightage to the presence of co-morbid factors. A high sensitivity and specificity for amputation was documented when a score of 14 was used as the threshold score. In salvaged limbs, the score was found to offer guidelines in protocols for reconstruction. According to the total score, injuries were treated by 'Fix and close' protocol; 'Fix, Bone Graft and Close' protocol, 'Fix and Flap' protocol or 'Stabilise, Watch, Assess and Reconstruct' protocol. The score was thus found to be useful clinically not only to assess salvage but also to provide guidelines in reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950263     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

1.  From guidelines to standards of care for open tibial fractures.

Authors:  R W Trickett; S Rahman; P Page; I Pallister
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Evaluation of the quality and cost-effectiveness of Versajet hydrosurgery.

Authors:  David C G Sainsbury
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Ganga hospital open injury score in management of open injuries.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S R Sabapathy; J Dheenadhayalan; S R Sundararajan; H Venkatramani; A Devendra; P Ramesh; K P Srikanth
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Working hand in glove with the orthopaedic surgeon: the era of the aggressive trauma reconstructive surgeon.

Authors:  V Langer; S Rajagopalan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-08-07

5.  Reconstruction in Warfare Injuries.

Authors:  V Langer
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  Open Fracture Management in Low-Resource Settings: A Medical Training Experience in Cambodian Hospitals.

Authors:  Nenad B Tajsic; Puon Sambath; Sophy Nguon; Vannara Sokh; Virak Chheang; Gaute Landsem; Ivan Zaletel; Hans Husum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Variation in practice preferences in management of open injuries of extremities-an international survey by SICOT research academy.

Authors:  Arun Kamal; Raja Bhaskara Kanakeshwar; Ashok Shyam; Dheenadayalan Jayaramaraju; Devendra Agraharam; Ramesh Perumal; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Reconstruction of complete knee extensor mechanism loss with gastrocnemius flaps.

Authors:  Thilak S Jepegnanam; P R J V C Boopalan; Manasseh Nithyananth; V T K Titus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Primary soft tissue management in open fracture].

Authors:  F Riechelmann; P Kaiser; R Arora
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  The utility of scores in the decision to salvage or amputation in severely injured limbs.

Authors:  Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.