Literature DB >> 26274736

Triple assessment is not necessary in most young women referred with breast symptoms.

D Yue1, C Swinson1, D Ravichandran1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A palpable lesion in the breast is usually subjected to triple assessment (clinical examination [CE], imaging and core biopsy [CB] or fine needle aspiration [FNA]) to minimise the risk of missing breast cancer. However, breast cancer is rare in young women, and triple assessment (especially CB) is invasive and expensive. Our aim was to see whether CB/FNA could be avoided in young women with benign findings on CE and imaging.
METHODS: This study analysed data from a prospectively entered database on female patients aged under 25 years who attended a rapid diagnosis breast clinic over a 68-month period.
RESULTS: Among 10,301 patients seen, 955 females (9.3%) were aged <25 years. The most common presenting complaint was a lump, followed by pain and nipple discharge. CE was normal or revealed benign findings in all except 15 patients, in whom it was indeterminate. Ultrasonography was performed in 692 patients (72%) and was normal (n=289) or benign (n=382) in all except 21 patients, in whom it was indeterminate. In six patients, both were indeterminate. A total of 317 patients (35%) had triple assessment: FNA in 106, CB in 239 and both in 9 cases. No cancers were diagnosed.
CONCLUSIONS: It would appear safe to omit FNA/CB in patients aged under 25 years when clinical and ultrasonography findings are normal or benign. This approach would have avoided needle biopsies in all but 30 patients (3%) in the study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast disease; Fine needle biopsy; Large core needle biopsy; Neoplasm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26274736      PMCID: PMC5126245          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications.

Authors:  Vilert A Loving; Wendy B DeMartini; Peter R Eby; Robert L Gutierrez; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Ultrasound diagnosis of fibroadenoma--is biopsy always necessary?

Authors:  L Hamilton; A Evans; E Cornford; J James; H Burrell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Breast carcinoma in young women.

Authors:  Patricia S Simmons; Yasmin L Jayasinghe; Lester E Wold; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  A T Stavros; D Thickman; C L Rapp; M A Dennis; S H Parker; G A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Criteria for the safe avoidance of needle sampling in young women with solid breast masses.

Authors:  A J Maxwell; J M Pearson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Diagnostic delay in breast cancer.

Authors:  M D Barber; W Jack; J M Dixon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Ultrasound diagnosis of fibroadenoma - is biopsy always necessary?

Authors:  G E C Smith; P Burrows
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  One-stop diagnostic breast clinics: how often are breast cancers missed?

Authors:  P Britton; S W Duffy; R Sinnatamby; M G Wallis; S Barter; M Gaskarth; A O'Neill; C Caldas; J D Brenton; P Forouhi; G C Wishart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Family History, Reproductive, and Lifestyle Risk Factors for Fibroadenoma and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Peh Joo Ho; Mikael Eriksson; Eva Darai-Ramqvist; Linda Sofie Lindström; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-12-10

2.  Fibroadenoma of the breast in a South African population -a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspirate cytology and breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sumana Pillay; Shalen Cheddie; Yoshan Moodley
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.